Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the glycosidases of semen: Purification and properties of α-D-mannopyranosidase from goat seminal plasma

  • General Articles
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Alpha D-mannosidase activity in goat semen was observed to be distributed in sperm and seminal plasma. In sperm the enzyme, present in soluble and bound forms, was located within the acrosome. The bound enzyme was associated with the denuded sperm. Seminal plasma α-mannosidase was purified 100-fold and the final preparation was shown to be homogeneous by polyacrylamide and SDS gel electrophoresis and on isoelectric focusing. The molecular weight of the enzyme, determined by gel filtration and disc electrophoresis in the presence of SDS, was 220,000. The isoelectric pH was 7.42 and the amino acid composition is reported.

α-Mannosidase catalyzed the hydrolysis of both synthetic and natural substrates. The Km of p-nitrophenyl α-D-mannoside and α-methyl D-mannoside were 0.695 mm and 71.9 mm at pH 4.0, the optimum pH. The natural substrates were hydrolysed to varying degrees. Zn2+ was not essential though it activated the enzyme activity over longer incubations. The enzyme was observed to be more stable at wider pH range in the presence of Zn2+ than in its absence. EDTA which did not affect the enzyme activity has effect on enzyme stability similar to Zn.2+ Seminal α-mannosidase is not a zinc metalloenzyme but is activated by Zn2+.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, Y. T., 1967. J. Biol. Chem. 242, 5474–5480.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conchie, J. and Mann, T., 1957. Nature, Lond. 179, 1190–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kher, A. and Anand, S. R., 1974. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys. 11, 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allison, A. C. and Hartree, E. F., 1970. J. Reprod. Fert. 21, 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mcrorie, R. A. and Williams, W. L., 1974. Ann. Review Biochem. 43, 777–803.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Metz, C. B., 1972. Biol. Reprod. 6, 358–383.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, C. R. and Hartree, E. F., 1974. J. Reprod. Fert. 35, 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anand, S. R., Kaur, S. P. and Chaudhry, P. S., 1977. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chemie 358, 685–688.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fishman, W. H., Springer, B. and Brunetti, R., 1948. J. Biol. Chem. 173, 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reissig, J. L., Strominger, J. L. and Leloir, L. F., 1955. J. Biol. Chem. 217, 959–966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kher, A. and Anand, S. R., 1974. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys. 11, 292–298.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, C. C., Mayer, H. E. (Jr) and Montgomery, R., 1970. Carb. Res. 13, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kanamori, M. and Kawabata, M., 1969. Agr. Biol. Chem. 33, 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glegg, R. E. and Eidinger, D., 1954. Anal. Chem. 26, 1365–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Somogyi, M., 1952. J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J., 1951. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Warburg, O. H. and Christian, W., 1941. Biochem. Z. 310, 384–421.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson, M. L., 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tombs, M. P. and Akroyd, P., 1967. Shandon Instrument Application No. 18.

  20. Weber, K. and Osborn, M., 1969. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406–4412.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wrigley, C. W., 1971. Meth. Enzymol. 22, 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snaith, S. M. and Levvy, G. A., 1969. Biochem. J. 114, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carrol, M., Dance, N., Masson, P. K., Robinson, D. and Winchester, B. G., 1972. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commen. 49, 579–583.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mellors, A. and Harwalkar, V. R., 1968. Can. J. Biochem. 46, 1451–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Langley, T. J. and Jevons, F. R., 1968. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 128, 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Philips, N. C., Robinson, D. and Winchester, B. G., 1976. Biochem. J. 153, 579–587.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marsh, C. A. and Gourlay, G. C., 1975. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 233, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Philips, N. C., Robinson, D. and Winchester, B. G., 1974. Biochem. J. 137, 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki, I., Kushida, H. and Shida, H., 1970. Seikagaku 42, 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dewald, B. and Touster, O., 1973. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 7223–7233.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sukeno, T., Tarentino, A. L. Plummer (Jr.), T. H. and Maley, F., 1972. Biochemistry 11, 1493–1500.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elisabeth, P. and Christensen, T. B., 1972. Eur. J. Biochem. 25, 308–314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

NDRI-publication no. 77-145.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, J., Bhatnagar, S.K. & Anand, S.R. Studies on the glycosidases of semen: Purification and properties of α-D-mannopyranosidase from goat seminal plasma. Mol Cell Biochem 21, 131–137 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240131

Keywords

Navigation