Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Size-fractionated primary production in the open Southern Ocean in austral spring

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Size-fractionated primary production was measured by carbon-14 uptake incubations on three transects between 47°S and 59°30′S along 6°W in October/November 1992. Open Antarctic Circumpolar Current and ice-covered Weddell Gyre water showed comparable low productivity (∼0.3 gCm−2 day−1) and size distribution. Picoplankton (<2 μm) was the dominant size fraction, contributing approximately half to the total water column production. The significance of larger (>20 μm) phytoplankton was only minor. Productivity in the Polar Front Zone north of 50°S, with higher water column stability, was up to 10 times higher with microplankton (>20 μm) being predominant. No ice-edge bloom occurred over the 2 months study period; this is explained by non-favourable hydrographic conditions for blooming and the lack of melt-water lenses upon ice retreat. Picoplankton tended to make higher contributions at lower water column stability, and microplankton to make higher contributions at higher stability. Mixing, together with light climate, are discussed as the driving forces for Antarctic primary production and for its size structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoli C, Scarabel LR, Tolomio C (1993) Distribution du picoplankton photoautotrophe dans la baie de Terra Nova (Mer de Ross, Antarctique) pendent l'été austral 1989–1990. Algol Stud 68:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Azam F, Smith DC, Hollibaugh JT (1991) The role of the microbial loop in Antarctic pelagic ecosystems. Polar Res 10:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Becquevort S, Mathot S, Lancelot C (1992) Interactions in the microbial community of the marginal ice zone of the northwestern Weddell Sea through size distribution analysis. Polar Biol 12:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi F, Boldrin A, Coice F, Dieckmann G, Kuosa H, Larsson AM, Nöthig EM, Sehlstedt PL, Socal G, Syvertsen EE (1992) Phytoplankton distribution in relation to sea ice, hydrography and nutrients in the northwestern Weddell Sea in early spring 1988 during EPOS. Polar Biol 12:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodungen B von (1986) Phytoplankton growth and krill grazing during spring in the Bransfield Strait, Antarctica — implications from sediment trap collections. Polar Biol 6:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand LE (1991) Minimum iron requirements of marine phytoplankton and the implication for the biogeochemical control of new production. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1756–1771

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröckel K von (1981) The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem. Kiel Meeresforsch [special issue] 5:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Buma AGJ, Tréguer P, Kraay CW, Morvan J (1990) Algal pigment patterns in different water masses of the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean during fall 1987. Polar Biol 11:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Buma AGJ, Gieskes WWC, Thomsen HA (1992) Abundance of Cryptophyceae and chlorophyll b containing organisms in the Weddell Sea Scotia Confluence area in the spring of 1988. Polar Biol 12:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Buma AGJ, Noordeloos AAM, Larsen J (1993) Strategies and kinetics of photoacclimation in three Antarctic nanophyto-flagellates. J Phycol 29:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm SW (1992) Phytoplankton Size. In:Falkowski PG, Woodhead AD (eds) Primary production and biogeochemical cycles in the sea. Plenum press, New York, pp 213–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiso JC (1991) Satellite remote sensing of polar oceans. J Mar Systems 2:395–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiso JC, McClain CR, Sullivan CW, Ryan JP, Leonard CL (1993) Coastal Zone Color Scanner pigment concentrations in the Southern Ocean and relationships to geophysical surface features. J Geophys Res 98-C2:2419–2451

    Google Scholar 

  • Cota GF, Kottmeier ST, Robinson DH, Smith WO, Sullivan CW (1990) Bacterioplankton in the marginal ice zone of the Weddell Sea:biomass, production and metabolic activities during austral autumn. Deep-Sea Res 37:1145–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTullio GR, Hutchins DA, Bruland KW (1993) Interaction of iron and major nutrients controls phytoplankton growth and species composition in the tropical North Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 38:495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppley RW, Sloan PR (1966) Growth rates of marine phytoplankton:correlation with light absorption by cell chlorophyll a. Physiol Plant 19:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala M, Delille D (1992) Variability and interactions of phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in the Antarctic neritic area. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 89:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison DL (1991) An overview of the abundance and role of protozooplankton in Antarctic waters. J Mar Systems 2:317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison DL, Buck KR (1989) Protozooplankton in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica:abundance and distribution in the ice edge zone. Polar Biol 9:341–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewes CD, Sakshaug E, Reid FMH, Holm-Hansen O (1990) Microbial autotrophic and heterotrophic eucaryotes in Antarctic waters:relationships between biomass and chlorophyll, adenosine triphosphate and particulate organic carbon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques G, Panouse M (1991) Biomass and composition of size fractionated phytoplankton in the Weddell-Scotia Confluence area. Polar Biol 11:315–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong JTM de, Löscher BM, Baar HJW de (1994) Iron in surface waters and sea-ice in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. EOS Transcr Am Geophys Union 75:178

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon C (1988) On the causes of interspecific differences in the growth-irradiance relationship for phytoplankton, II: general review. J Plankton Res 10:1291–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher RK, Perissinotto R, McQuaid CD (1993) Phytoplankton production and biomass at frontal zones in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Polar Biol 13:471–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre L, Demers S, Yentsch CM, Yentsch CS (1983) The 14C method:patterns of dark CO2 fixation and DCMU correction to replace the dark bottle. Limnol Oceanogr 28:996–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin JH, Gordon RM, Fitzwater SE (1990) Iron in Antarctic waters. Nature 345:156–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathot S, Dandois JM, Lancelot C (1992) Gross and net primary production in the Scotia-Weddell Sea sector of the Southern Ocean during spring 1988. Polar Biol 12:321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BG, Holm-Hansen O (1991) Observation and modelling of the Antarctic phytoplankton crop in relation to mixing depth. Deep-Sea Res 38:981–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Bricaud A (1981) Theoretical results concerning light absorption in a discrete medium and application to specific absorption of phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res 28:1375–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel FMM, Hudson RJM, Price NM (1991) Limitation of productivity by trace metals in the sea. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1742–1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimbault P, Rodier M, Taupier-Letage I (1988) Size fractionation of phytoplankton in the Ligurian Sea and the Algerian Basin (Mediterranean Sea): Size distribution versus total concentration. Mar Microb Food Webs 3:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakshaug E, Slagstad D, Holm-Hansen O (1991) Factors controlling the development of phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Ocean — a mathematical model. Mar Chem 35:259–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger DA, Molot LA, Shuter BJ (1981) Specific growth rates of freshwater algae in relation to cell size and light intensity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1052–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth J.McN, Smetacek V, Lenz J (1978) Pelagic ecosystem structure:Heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1256–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek V, Passow U (1990) Spring bloom initiation and Sverdrup's critical depth model. Limnol Oceanogr 35:228–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek V, Scharek R, Nöthig EM (1990) Seasonal and regional variation in the pelagial and its relationship to the lift history cycle of krill. In:Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WO Jr, Nelson DM (1985) Phytoplankton bloom produced by a receding ice edge in the Ross Sea: spatial coherence with the density field. Science 227:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WO, Keene NK, Comiso JC (1988) Interannual variability in estimated primary productivity of the Antarctic marginal ice zone. In:Sarhage D (ed) Antarctic Ocean and resources variability. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (1989) Maximal growth rates of Antarctic phytoplankton: only weak dependence on cell size. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1109–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CW, McClain CR, Comiso JC, Smith WO (1988) Phytoplstanding crops within Antarctic ice edge assessed by satellite remote sensing. J Geophys Res 93:487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunda WG, Swift DG, Huntsman SA (1991) Iron growth requirements in oceanic and coastal phytoplankton. Nature 351:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup HU (1953) On conditions for the vernal blooming of phytoplankton. J Cons Perm Int Explor Mer 18:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Veth C, Peeken I, Scharek R (1994) Physical anatomy of fronts and surface waters in the ACC near the 6°W meridian during austral spring 1992. Deep-Sea Res (in press)

  • Weber LH, El-Sayed SZ (1987) Contributions of the net, nanoand picoplankton to the phytoplankton standing crop and primary productivity in the Southern Ocean. J Plankton Res 9:973–994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105, Kiel, Germany

    Frank J. Jochem

  2. Groupe de Microbiologie des Milieux Aquatiques, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine CP 221, B-1050, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Sylvie Mathot

  3. URA CNRS D 1513, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, BP 459, F-99975, Brest, France

    Bernard Quéguiner

Authors
  1. Frank J. Jochem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvie Mathot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard Quéguiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jochem, F.J., Mathot, S. & Quéguiner, B. Size-fractionated primary production in the open Southern Ocean in austral spring. Polar Biol 15, 381–392 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239714

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239714

Keywords

Search

Navigation