Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 395–402 | Cite as

Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man

  • J. C. Gilhodes
  • J. P. Roll
  • M. F. Tardy-Gervet
Article

Summary

Perceptual and motor effects of vibration applied simultaneously to the distal tendons of the Biceps and Triceps muscles, in isometric conditions and without sight of the stimulated arm, have been studied in human volunteers. Motor effects, measured by surface EMG, are inexistent when the flexor and extensor muscles are simultaneously vibrated at the same frequency. However, EMG activity appears in the muscle being vibrated at the lower frequency when simultaneous vibration is applied at different frequencies. The sensations felt by the subjects were reproduced by the nonvibrated arm and recorded by a goniometer. The studies show that the velocity and the amplitude of the ilusory movement is related to the difference in vibration frequency applied to the two muscles. The direction of movement felt (flexion or extension) is that produced by shortening of the muscle being vibrated at the lower frequency. When the two vibration frequencies are the same, there is either no sensation of movement, or a sensation of very slow movement. These results support the notion that the sensation of movement at a joint may be derived from a central processing of the proprioceptive inflow data obtained from flexor and extensor muscles. This interpretation may also be valid for the results obtained earlier by vibration of a single muscle. Furthermore, it is coherent with data on spindle afferent fibres obtained by microneurography in man during passive or active movements.

Key words

Kinesthesia Muscle afferents Vibration EMG 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgess PR, Clark FJ (1969) Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 203: 301–317Google Scholar
  2. Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, Wallin BG (1976a) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non contracting muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 261: 673–693Google Scholar
  3. Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, Wallin BG (1976b) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J Physiol (Lond) 261: 695–711Google Scholar
  4. Capaday C, Cooke JD (1983) Vibration-induced changes in movement related E.M.G. activity in humans. Exp Brain Res 52: 139–146Google Scholar
  5. Cross MJ, McCloskey DI (1973) Position sense following surgical replacement of joint in man. Brain Res 55: 443–445Google Scholar
  6. Eklund G, Hagbarth KE (1965) Motor effects of vibratory muscle stimuli in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 19: 619Google Scholar
  7. Eklund G (1972) Position sense and state of contraction: the effects of vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 35: 606–611Google Scholar
  8. Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982a) Afferent and efferent components of joint position sense; interpretation of kinaesthetic illusions. Biol Cybern 42: 205–214Google Scholar
  9. Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982b) Interaction of afferent and efferent signals underlying joint position sense: empirical and theoretical approaches. J Motor Behav 14: 174–193Google Scholar
  10. Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982c) Inversions of vibration-induced senso-motor events caused by supraspinal influences in man. Neurosci Lett 31: 147–151Google Scholar
  11. Ferrel WR (1980) The adequacy of stretch receptors in the cat knee joint for signalling joint angle throughout a full range of movement. J Physiol (Lond) 32: 85–99Google Scholar
  12. Goodwin GM, Mc Closkey DI, Matthews PBC (1972a) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95: 705–748Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin GM, Mc Closkey DI, Matthews PBC (1972b) Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception? Science 175: 1382–1384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grigg P, Finerman GA, Riley LH (1973) Joint position sense after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 55A: 1016–1025Google Scholar
  15. Grigg P, Greenspan BJ (1977) Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. J Neurophysiol 40: 1–8Google Scholar
  16. Hagbarth KE (1980) A critique of the papers by Loeb and Hoffer, and Prochazka and Wand. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 245–247Google Scholar
  17. Hulliger M, Vallbo AB (1979) The response of muscle spindle afferents during voluntary tracking movements. Load-dependent servo assistance? Brain Res 166: 401–404Google Scholar
  18. Jankowska E (1979) New observations on neuronal organization of reflexes from tendon organ afferents and their relation to reflexes evoked from muscle spindle afferents. In: Granit R, Pompeiano O (eds) Progress in brain research reflex control of posture and movement. Elsevier, N.H.B.P., Amsterdam, 50: 29–36Google Scholar
  19. Jankowska E, Johannisson T, Lipski J (1981) Common interneurones in reflex pathways from group Ia and Ib afferents of ankle extensors in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 310: 381–402Google Scholar
  20. Karangia PN, Ferguson JH (1983) Passive joint position sense after total hip replacement surgery. Ann Neurol 13: 654–657Google Scholar
  21. Lance JW (1965) The mechanism of reflex irridiation. Proc Austr Ass Neurol 3: 77–82Google Scholar
  22. Lance JW, Burke D, Andrews CJ (1973) The reflex effects of muscle vibration. Studies of tendon jerk irridiation, phasic reflex inhibition and the tonic vibration reflex. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology. Karger, Basel, 3: 444–462Google Scholar
  23. Loeb GE, Hoffer JA (1980) Muscle spindle function during normal and perturbed locomotion in cats. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 219–228Google Scholar
  24. Lundberg A, Malmgren K, Schomburg E-D (1977) Comments on reflex actions evoked by electrical stimulations of group II muscle afferents. Brain Res 122: 551–555Google Scholar
  25. Mc Closkey DI (1978) Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58: 763–820Google Scholar
  26. Mc Closkey DI, Cross MJ, Honner R, Potter EK (1983) Sensory effects of pulling or vibrating exposed tendons in man. Brain 106: 21–37Google Scholar
  27. Matthews PBC, Simmonds A (1974) Sensation of finger movement elicited by pulling upon flexor tendons in man. J Physiol (Lond) 239: 27–28Google Scholar
  28. Matthews PBC (1983) Where does Sherrington's “muscular sense” originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Ann Rev Neurosci 5: 189–218Google Scholar
  29. Moberg E (1983) The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia and motor function of the hand. Brain 106: 1–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pouget J, Gilhodes JC, Roll JP (1983) Vibration induced perceptive and motor effects after total joint replacement in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 56: 154Google Scholar
  31. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Tardy-Gervet MF (1980a) Effets perceptifs et moteurs des vibrations musculaires chez l'homme. Mise en évidence d'une réponse des muscles antagonistes. Arch Ital Biol 118: 51–71Google Scholar
  32. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Tardy-Gervet MF (1980b) Effets de la vision sur la réponse tonique vibratoire d'un muscle ou de ses antagonistes chez l'homme normal. Experientia 36: 70–72Google Scholar
  33. Roll JP (1981) Contribution de la proprioception musculaire à la perception et au contrôle du movement chez l'homme. Thèse de doctorat es-sciences, Université Aix-Marseille, 194 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47: 177–190Google Scholar
  35. Sherrington CS (1900) The muscular sense. In: Schäfer EA (ed) Textbook of physiology, Edinburgh 2: 1002–1025Google Scholar
  36. Vallbo AB (1973) Muscle spindle afferent discharge from resting and contracting muscles in normal human subjects. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology. Karger, Basel, 3: 251–262Google Scholar
  37. Vallbo AB (1980) Differences in muscle spindle discharge during natural movement in cat and man. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 249–255Google Scholar
  38. Vedel JP, Roll JP (1983) Muscle spindle contribution to the coding of motor activities in man. Exp Brain Res Suppl 7: 253–265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Gilhodes
    • 1
  • J. P. Roll
    • 1
  • M. F. Tardy-Gervet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Humaine, Département de PsychophysiologieUniversité de Provence, U.A. C.N.R.S. 372MarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations