Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Perceptual and motor effects of vibration applied simultaneously to the distal tendons of the Biceps and Triceps muscles, in isometric conditions and without sight of the stimulated arm, have been studied in human volunteers. Motor effects, measured by surface EMG, are inexistent when the flexor and extensor muscles are simultaneously vibrated at the same frequency. However, EMG activity appears in the muscle being vibrated at the lower frequency when simultaneous vibration is applied at different frequencies. The sensations felt by the subjects were reproduced by the nonvibrated arm and recorded by a goniometer. The studies show that the velocity and the amplitude of the ilusory movement is related to the difference in vibration frequency applied to the two muscles. The direction of movement felt (flexion or extension) is that produced by shortening of the muscle being vibrated at the lower frequency. When the two vibration frequencies are the same, there is either no sensation of movement, or a sensation of very slow movement. These results support the notion that the sensation of movement at a joint may be derived from a central processing of the proprioceptive inflow data obtained from flexor and extensor muscles. This interpretation may also be valid for the results obtained earlier by vibration of a single muscle. Furthermore, it is coherent with data on spindle afferent fibres obtained by microneurography in man during passive or active movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess PR, Clark FJ (1969) Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 203: 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, Wallin BG (1976a) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non contracting muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 261: 673–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, Wallin BG (1976b) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J Physiol (Lond) 261: 695–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaday C, Cooke JD (1983) Vibration-induced changes in movement related E.M.G. activity in humans. Exp Brain Res 52: 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross MJ, McCloskey DI (1973) Position sense following surgical replacement of joint in man. Brain Res 55: 443–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund G, Hagbarth KE (1965) Motor effects of vibratory muscle stimuli in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 19: 619

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund G (1972) Position sense and state of contraction: the effects of vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 35: 606–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982a) Afferent and efferent components of joint position sense; interpretation of kinaesthetic illusions. Biol Cybern 42: 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982b) Interaction of afferent and efferent signals underlying joint position sense: empirical and theoretical approaches. J Motor Behav 14: 174–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Latash ML (1982c) Inversions of vibration-induced senso-motor events caused by supraspinal influences in man. Neurosci Lett 31: 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrel WR (1980) The adequacy of stretch receptors in the cat knee joint for signalling joint angle throughout a full range of movement. J Physiol (Lond) 32: 85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, Mc Closkey DI, Matthews PBC (1972a) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95: 705–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, Mc Closkey DI, Matthews PBC (1972b) Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception? Science 175: 1382–1384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg P, Finerman GA, Riley LH (1973) Joint position sense after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 55A: 1016–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg P, Greenspan BJ (1977) Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. J Neurophysiol 40: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagbarth KE (1980) A critique of the papers by Loeb and Hoffer, and Prochazka and Wand. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 245–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Vallbo AB (1979) The response of muscle spindle afferents during voluntary tracking movements. Load-dependent servo assistance? Brain Res 166: 401–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska E (1979) New observations on neuronal organization of reflexes from tendon organ afferents and their relation to reflexes evoked from muscle spindle afferents. In: Granit R, Pompeiano O (eds) Progress in brain research reflex control of posture and movement. Elsevier, N.H.B.P., Amsterdam, 50: 29–36

  • Jankowska E, Johannisson T, Lipski J (1981) Common interneurones in reflex pathways from group Ia and Ib afferents of ankle extensors in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 310: 381–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Karangia PN, Ferguson JH (1983) Passive joint position sense after total hip replacement surgery. Ann Neurol 13: 654–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance JW (1965) The mechanism of reflex irridiation. Proc Austr Ass Neurol 3: 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance JW, Burke D, Andrews CJ (1973) The reflex effects of muscle vibration. Studies of tendon jerk irridiation, phasic reflex inhibition and the tonic vibration reflex. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology. Karger, Basel, 3: 444–462

  • Loeb GE, Hoffer JA (1980) Muscle spindle function during normal and perturbed locomotion in cats. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg A, Malmgren K, Schomburg E-D (1977) Comments on reflex actions evoked by electrical stimulations of group II muscle afferents. Brain Res 122: 551–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Closkey DI (1978) Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58: 763–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Closkey DI, Cross MJ, Honner R, Potter EK (1983) Sensory effects of pulling or vibrating exposed tendons in man. Brain 106: 21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC, Simmonds A (1974) Sensation of finger movement elicited by pulling upon flexor tendons in man. J Physiol (Lond) 239: 27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1983) Where does Sherrington's “muscular sense” originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Ann Rev Neurosci 5: 189–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg E (1983) The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia and motor function of the hand. Brain 106: 1–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pouget J, Gilhodes JC, Roll JP (1983) Vibration induced perceptive and motor effects after total joint replacement in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 56: 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Tardy-Gervet MF (1980a) Effets perceptifs et moteurs des vibrations musculaires chez l'homme. Mise en évidence d'une réponse des muscles antagonistes. Arch Ital Biol 118: 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Tardy-Gervet MF (1980b) Effets de la vision sur la réponse tonique vibratoire d'un muscle ou de ses antagonistes chez l'homme normal. Experientia 36: 70–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP (1981) Contribution de la proprioception musculaire à la perception et au contrôle du movement chez l'homme. Thèse de doctorat es-sciences, Université Aix-Marseille, 194 pp

  • Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47: 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington CS (1900) The muscular sense. In: Schäfer EA (ed) Textbook of physiology, Edinburgh 2: 1002–1025

  • Vallbo AB (1973) Muscle spindle afferent discharge from resting and contracting muscles in normal human subjects. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology. Karger, Basel, 3: 251–262

  • Vallbo AB (1980) Differences in muscle spindle discharge during natural movement in cat and man. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. McMillan Publishers, London Basingstoke, pp 249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedel JP, Roll JP (1983) Muscle spindle contribution to the coding of motor activities in man. Exp Brain Res Suppl 7: 253–265

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the Ministère de l'Industrie et de la Recherche

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilhodes, J.C., Roll, J.P. & Tardy-Gervet, M.F. Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man. Exp Brain Res 61, 395–402 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239528

Key words

Navigation