Skip to main content

Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain

Summary

Many units in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea fowl are found to be tuned to amplitude modulated tones (AM). For a given response maximum the relationship of the period τm of the modulation frequency fm and the period τc of the carrier frequency fc may be given by an empirical equation: m · τm + n · τc = 1 · τ1, where m, n and 1 are small integers typical for a unit. τ1 is a time constant of 0.4 ms. The temporal pattern of the neuronal response support these findings. The averages of spike trains oscillate with periods multiple to τ1. These oscillations are elicited by stimulus onsets and zero crossings of fm and may be coupled strongly to fm depending on fc. Variation of fm or fc shifts the mean delay of the phase coupled activity proportional to m · τm and n · τc, respectively. These effects may be explained with activity phase coupled to fc which coincides at the level of the recorded units with oscillations coupled to fm. This is expressed by the above given periodicity equation. Psychophysical results with AM-stimuli indicate that the mechanisms described and the periodicity equation are adequate for the explanation of the analysis of periodicity pitch in humans. Hence the period corresponding to pitch is defined by m · τm + n · τc = 1 · τ1, where n and 1 are integers and τ1 = 0.4 ms. Plots of τp as a function of τc reveal steps at 0.4 ms intervals indicating that the neuronal time constant is the same in both species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Boer E de (1956) On the residue in hearing. Academisch Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam

  • Brink G van den, Sintnicolaas K, Stam WS van (1976) Dichotic pitch fusion. J Acoust Soc Am 59: 1471–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos R, Schwartzkopff J, Ruppert A (1959) Microelectrode study of superior olivary nuclei. Am J Physiol 197: 527–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JL (1978) Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch. Audiology 17: 421–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst E von (1939) Die relative Koordination als Phänomen und als Methode zentralnervöser Funktionsanalyse. Ergebn Physiol 42: 228–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang NY, Pfeiffer RR, Warr WB, Backus ASN (1965) Stimulus coding in the cochlear nucleus. Ann Otol (St. Louis) 74: 463–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Langner G (1978) The periodicity matrix. A correlation model for central auditory frequency analysis. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges, p 194

  • Langner G, Scheich H (1978) Active phase coupling in electric fish. Behavioral control with microsecond precision. J Comp Physiol 128: 235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider JCR (1951) A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia 7: 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer RR (1966) Classification of response patterns of spike discharge for units in the cochlear nucleus. Tone-burst stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1: 220–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Langner G, Koch R (1977) Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). J Comp Physiol 117: 245–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten JF (1970) The residue revisited. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF (eds) Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Sijthoff, Leiden, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt E (1972) Zur Tonhöhenwahrnehmung von Klängen. II. Ein Funktionsschema. Acustica 26: 187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever EG (1949) Theory of hearing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman FL (1973) The pattern-transformation model of pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 407–416

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the DFG, SFB 45

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langner, G. Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain. Exp Brain Res 44, 450–454 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238840

Key words

  • Pitch analysis
  • Neuronal correlations
  • Auditory system