Skip to main content
Log in

Interhemispheric influences on area 19 of the cat

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Anatomical studies have shown an extensive network of homotopic and heterotopic interhemispheric connections in area 19 of the cat visual cortex (Segraves and Rosenquist 1982a; 1982b). We have investigated their functional organization by recording visual responses in area 19 of cats following a midsagittal section of the optic chiasm. This operation interrupts all crossed optic fibers coming both from the nasal and the temporal retinae; as a result, each hemisphere receives optic fibers only from the lateral hemiretina of the ipsilateral eye which conveys information from the contralateral visual field. Visual information transmitted to the same hemisphere from the contralateral retina and the ipsilateral visual field must be attributed to an indirect, interhemispheric pathway. We found that a rather high proportion of neurons (31.8%) in area 19 of seven split-chiasm cats responded to visual stimuli presented to the contralateral eye. 1 — All neurons receiving this interhemispheric activation were also driven by the ipsilateral eye via an intrahemispheric pathway. 2 — The property of binocularity was significantly related to the visuotopic map in that both receptive fields of each binocular neuron adjoined or were in the immediate vicinity of the vertical meridian. 3 — Due to the small size of receptive fields in area 19, the contribution of the interhemispheric pathway to the representation of the visual field is rather limited and it is certainly less extensive than that predicted by anatomical studies. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in area 19 of intact cats, as assessed electrophy-siologically, was comparable to that found in split-chiasm cats. Recordings in areas 17–18 of split-chiasm cats showed that the visual field represented through the corpus callosum in these visual areas is certainly not less and probably more, extensive than that found in area 19. The results support the conclusion that the relation to the vertical meridian and the receptive field size can explain the organization of the interhemispheric connections in the visual areas studied so far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albus K, Beckmann R (1980) Second and third visual areas of the cat: interindividual variability in retinotopic arrangement and cortical location. J Physiol (Lond) 299: 247–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonini A, Berlucchi G, Marzi CA, Sprague JM (1979) Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of unilateral optic tract section in ordinary and siamese cats. J Comp Neurol 185: 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonini A, Berlucchi G, Lepore F (1983) Physiological organization of callosal connections of a visual lateral suprasylvian cortical area in the cat. J Neurophysiol 49: 902–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Batini C, Moruzzi G, Palestini M, Rossi GF, Zanchetti A (1959) Effect of complete, pontine transections on the sleep-wakefulness rhythm: the midpontine pretrigeminal preparation. Arch Ital Biol 97: 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G (1981) Recent advances in the analysis of the neural substrates of interhemispheric communication. In: Pompeiano O, Ajmone Marsan C (eds) Brain mechanisms of perceptual awareness and purposeful behavior. Raven, New York, pp 133–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Rizzolatti G (1968) Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science 159: 308–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Sprague JM (1981) The cerebral cortex in visual learning and memory, and in interhemispheric transfer in the cat. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG, Adelman G, Dennis SG (eds) The organization of the cerebral cortex. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 415–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop PO, Kozak W, Vakkur GT (1962) Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field coordinates and optics. J Physiol (Lond) 163: 466–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper ML, Pettigrew JD (1979) A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl. J Comp Neurol 184: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson IML, Whitteridge D (1977) The nature of the boundary between cortical visual areas II and III in the cat. Proc R Soc Lond B 199: 445–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow BM, Dubner R (1971) Single-unit responses to moving visual stimuli in middle suprasylvian gyms of the cat. J Neurophysiol 34: 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Duysens J, Orban GA, van der Glas HW, de Zegher FE (1982a) Functional properties of area 19 as compared to area 17 of the cat. Brain Res 231: 279–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Duysens J, Orban GA, van der Glas HW, Maes H (1982b) Receptive field structure of area 19 as compared to area 17 of the cat. Brain Res 231: 293–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner FF, Myers RE (1965) Distribution of corpus callosum and anterior commissure in the cat and raccoon. J Comp Neurol 124: 353–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybiel AM, Berson DM (1981) On the relation between transthalamic and transcortical pathways in the visual system. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG, Adelman G, Dennis SG (eds) The organization of the cerebral cortex. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 285–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath CJ, Jones EG (1970) Connexions of area 19 and the lateral suprasylvian area of the visual cortex of the cat. Brain Res 19: 302–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160: 106–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1965) Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol 28: 229–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1967) Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat. J Neurophysiol 30: 1561–1573

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1979) Brain mechanisms of vision. Sci Am 241: 130–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti G (1980) The primary visual pathway through the corpus callosum: morphological and functional aspects in the cat. Arch Ital Biol 118: 124–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore F, Guillemot JP (1982) Visual receptive field properties of cells innervated through the corpus callosum. Exp Brain Res 46: 413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzi CA, Antonini A, Di Stefano M, Legg CR (1982) The contribution of the corpus callosum to receptive fields in the lateral suprasylvian visual area of the cat. Behav Brain Res 4: 155–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich MM, Kaas JH (1980) Principles of organization of sensory-perceptual systems in mammals. Prog Psychobiol Physiol Psychol 9: 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RE (1955) Interocular transfer of pattern discrimination in cats following section of crossed optic fibers. J Comp Physiol Psychol 48: 470–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikara T, Bishop PO, Pettigrew JD (1968) Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 6: 353–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Orban GA (1984) Studies in brain function: Neuronal operations in the visual cortex. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, pp 1–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson KJ, Sherman SM (1971) Nasotemporal overlap in visual field projected to lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat. J Neurophysiol 34: 453–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanides D, Albus K (1980) The distribution of interhemispheric projections in area 18 of the cat: coincidence with discontinuities of the representation of the visual field in the second visual area (V2). Exp Brain Res 38: 237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanides D, Hoffmann J (1969) Cyto- and myelo-architecture of the visual cortex of the cat and the surrounding integration cortices. J Hirnforsch 11: 79–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Segraves MA, Rosenquist AC (1982a) The distribution of the cells of origin of callosal projections in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 2: 1079–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Segraves MA, Rosenquist AC (1982b) The afferent and efferent callosal connections of retinotopically defined areas in cat cortex. J Neurosci 2: 1090–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J (1966) The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina. J Comp Neurol 126: 585–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J (1978) The number and distribution of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J Comp Neurol 180: 753–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusa RJ (1982) Visual cortex: multiple areas and multiple functions. In: Morrison AR, Strick P (eds) Changing concepts of the nervous system. Academic Press, New York London, pp 235–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusa RJ, Rosenquist AC, Palmer LA (1979) Retinotopic organization of areas 18 and 19 in the cat. J Comp Neurol 185: 657–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakkur GJ, Bishop PO, Kozak W (1963) Visual optics in the cat, including posterior nodal distance and retinal landmarks. Vision Res 3: 289–314

    Google Scholar 

  • van Essen DC (1979) Visual areas of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 2: 227–263

    Google Scholar 

  • van Essen DC, Newsome WT, Bixby JL (1982) The pattern of interhemispheric connections and its relationship to extrastriate visual areas in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 2: 265–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitteridge D, Clarke PGH (1982) Ipsilateral visual field represented in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurosci 7: 1855–1860

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antonini, A., Di Stefano, M., Minciacchi, D. et al. Interhemispheric influences on area 19 of the cat. Exp Brain Res 59, 171–184 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237677

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237677

Key words

Navigation