Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of cell-bound and cell-free hemolytic activity of proteus strains

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between growth condition and production of cell-bound hemolysin by Proteus mirabilis 51959 strain was investigated. Hemolytic activity was not dependent on type of medium, oxygen accessibility and was inhibited in presence of N-ethylmaleimide, different sera or trypsine. Cell-free hemolysin was released to the medium during stationary-death phases of growth of fluid Proteus mirabilis and vulgaris cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fry B.A. (1955): Glutamine synthesis by Microccus pyogenes var. aureus. - Biochem. J. 59: 579.585.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hacker J. and Goebel W. (1987): Mechanism and methods for analysing pathogenecity. - Swiss. Biotech. 5: 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koronakis V., Cross M., Senior B., Koronakis B. and Hughes C. (1987): The secreted hemolysins of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, and Morganella morgani are genetically related to each other and to the alphahemolysin of Escherichia coli. - J. Bacteriol. 169: 1509–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kotelko K., Kaca W., Róźalski A. and Deka M. (1983): Some biological features of Proteus bacilli. 2. Haemolytic activities of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris strains. - Acta Microbiol. Polon. 4: 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kreger BE, Craven D.E., Carling P.C. and Mc Cabe W.R. (1980): Gram negative bacteriemia. III. Reassessment of etiology, epidemiology and ecology in 612 patients. - Am. J. Med. 68: 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mackman N., Nicaud J.M., Gray L. and Holland I.B. (1986): Secretion of haemolysin by Esherichia coli. -Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 125: 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peerbooms P.G.H., Verweij A.M.J.J. and MacLaren D.M. (1983): Investigation of the haemolytic activity of Proteus mirabilis strains. - Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 49: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peerbooms P.G.H., Verweji A.M.J.J. and MacLaren D.M. (1984): Vero cell invasiveness of Proteus mirabilis. - Infect. Immun. 43: 1068–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peerbooms P.G.H., Verweji A.M.J.J. and MacLaren D.M. (1985): Uropathogenic properties of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris. - J. Med. Microbiol. 19: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Róźalski A., Dlugońska H. and Kotelko K. (1986): Cell invasiveness of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris strains. - Archiv. Immun. Ther. Exp. 34: 505–512.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Róźalski A. and Kotelko K. (1987): Hemolytic activity and invasiveness in strains of Proteus penneri. - J. Clin. Microbiol. 25: 1094–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Senior B.W. and Hughes C. (1987): Production and properties of haemolysins from clinical isolates of the Proteeae. - J. Med. Microbiol. 24: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith H.W. (1963): The haemolysins of Escherichia coli. - J. Path. Bacteriol. 85: 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swihart K.G. and Welch R.A. (1990): The HpmA hemolysin is more common than H1pyA among Proteus isolates. - Infect. Immun. 58: 1853–1860.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welch R.A. (1987): Identification of two different hemolysin determinants in uropathogenic Proteus isolates. - Infec. Immun. 55: 2183–2190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaca, W., Ró\`zalski, A. Characterization of cell-bound and cell-free hemolytic activity of proteus strains. Eur J Epidemiol 7, 159–165 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237360

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237360

Key words

Navigation