Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated Glycine max protoplasts

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electroporation was used to evaluate parameters affecting transient gene expression in Glycine max protoplasts. Protoplast viability and reporter enzyme activity for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) and ß-glucuronidase (GUS) depended on the field strength employed. Maximum CAT and GUS activity was obtained when a field strength of 500 V/cm at 1000 μF and a protoplast concentration of 1–3 × 106/ml was used. Transformation efficiencies up to approximately 1.6% GUS positive protoplasts were obtained. Transient gene expression increased with increasing plasmid DNA concentration and with the time after electroporation, reaching a maximum after 48 hr. Addition of polyethylene glycol at 5.6% and heat shock (5 rain at 45 °C) given to the protoplasts before adding DNA further enhanced the transformation efficiency. Under the optimized experimental conditions, CAT and GUS activity increased simultaneously, thereby indicating that the increased expression is caused by DNA uptake by more cells rather than greater DNA uptake by the same cells. Our results demonstrate that both GUS and CAT can be used as efficient screenable markers for transformation studies in soybean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAT:

chloramphenicol acetyl transferase

GUS:

ß-glucuronidase

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

References

  • Benfey PN, Chua NH (1990) Science 250: 959–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnboim HC, Doly J (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 7: 1513–1523.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower R, Birch RG (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, Swain WF (1990) Theor Appl Genet 79: 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, McCabe DE, Martinell BJ, Swain WF (1990) TIBTECH 8: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Rech EL, Mulligan BJ (1989) Plant Mol Biol 13: 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir SK, Dhir S, Widholm JM (1991) Plant Cell Rep (In Press).

  • Fromm M, Callis J, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1987) Meth Enzymol 153: 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman CM, Moffat LF, Howard BH (1982) Mol Cell Biol 2: 1044–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard EA, Walker JC, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ (1987) Planta 170: 535–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) EMBO J 6: 3901–3907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones H, Ooms G, Jones MGK (1989) Plant Mol Biol 13: 503–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1977) Mole Gen Genet 150: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key JL, Kimpel JA, Nagao RT (1987) UCLA Symp Mol Cell Biol New Ser 62: 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Taylor BH, Gersmann M, Bretell RIS (1990) Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Murdoch K, Topping J, Kreis M, Jones MGK (1989) Plant Mol Biol 13: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Odell JT, Schreiner RM (1987) Plant Physiol 84: 856–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T (1989) Int Rev Cytol 116: 229–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguin A, Lalonde M (1988) Plant Cell Rep 7: 367–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillito RD, Saul MW, Paszkowski J, Müller M, Potrykus I (1985) Bio/technology 3: 1099–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer R, Pröls M, Schell J, Steinbiß H-H (1988) Plant Cell Rep. 7: 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchimiya H, Harada T, Brar DS (1989) J of Biotehnology 12: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widholm JM (1972) Stain Technol 47: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JH, Atherly AG (1990) Plant Cell Rep 8: 542–545.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. N. Beachy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhir, S.K., Dhir, S., Hepburn, A. et al. Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated Glycine max protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports 10, 106–110 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236468

Keywords

Navigation