Skip to main content
Log in

Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of oilseed Brassica campestris: Transformation frequency is strongly influenced by the mode of shoot regeneration

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Protocols were developed for efficient shoot regeneration from hypocotyl and cotyledon explants of oilseed Brassica campestris (brown sarson) cv. ‘Pusa Kalyani’. These were used for genetic transformation by an Agrobacterium based binary vector carrying neomycin phosphotransferase (npt) gene and β-glucuronidase (gus)-intron gene for plant cell specific expression. Transformed plants were recovered from hypocotyl explants at a frequency of 7–13%. Addition of silver nitrate markedly enhanced shoot regeneration in hypocotyl explants under non-selection conditions and was found to be an absolute requirement under selection conditions. Cotyledon explants, inspite of being more regenerative, proved to be highly refractory to transformation. Only two chimeric transformed shoots were obtained from more than 10,000 cotyledons treated with Agrobacterium. In hypocotyl explants, shoot regeneration occurred from the vascular parenchyma both with and without the intervention of callus phase. Only the shoot buds differentiating from callus tissue were positive for GUS activity. In cotyledons, shoot buds originated only directly from the vascular parenchyma, generally at a distance of about 450–625 μ from the cut surface. Such shoots were negative for GUS activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barfield DG, Pua EC (1991) Gene transfer in Brassica juncea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Reports 10:308–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan M (1984) Binary transformation vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12:8711–8721

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddington NL, Sutherland RA, Robinson HT (1988) Silver nitrate increases embryo production in anther culture of Brussel sprouts. Ann Bot 62:181–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Charest PJ, Holbrook LA, Gabard J, Iyer VN, Miki BL (1988) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of thin cell layer explants from Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet 75:438–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi GL, Pua EC (1989) Ethylene inhibitors enhances de novo shoot regeneration from cotyledons of Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis (chinese cabbage) in vitro. Plant Sci 64:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi GL, Barfield DG, Sim GE, Pua EC (1990) Effect of AgNO3and aminoethoxyvinylglycine on in vitro shoot and root organogenesis from seedling explants of recalcitrant Brassica genotypes. Plant Cell Reports 9:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Chraibi KM, Latche A, Roustan JP, Fallot J (1991) Stimulation of shoot regeneration from cotyledons of Helianthus annuus by the ethylene inhibitors silver and cobalt. Plant Cell Reports 10:204–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • David C, Tempe J (1988) Genetic transformation of caulifower (Brassica oleracea L. var. Botrytis)by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Reports 7:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block M (1988) Genotype independent leaf disc transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Theor Appl Genet 76:767–774

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block M, De Brouwer D, Tenning P (1989) Transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the expression of the bar and neo genes in the transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 91:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant molecular DNA minipreparation version: II. Plant Mol Biol Reporter 1:19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietert MF, Barron SA, Yoder OC (1982) Effects of genotype on in vitro culture in the genus Brassica. Plant Sci Lett 26:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM (1981) In vitro regeneration from excised leaf discs of three Brassica species. J Exp Biol 32:789–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder N, O'Brien TP (1968) Plant microtechnique: Some inciples and new methods. Am J Bot 55:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann KA, Marks MD (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana: A non-tissue culture approach. Mol Gen Genet 208:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch RB (1987) Transformation of Brassica napus with Agrobacterium tumefaciens based vectors. Plant Cell Reports 6:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould J, Devey M, Hasegawa O, Ullian EC, Peterson G, Smith RH (1991) Transformation of Zea mays L. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the shoot apex. Plant Physiol 95:426–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachey JE, Sharma KK, Moloney MM (1991) Efficient shoot regeneration of Brassica campestris using cotyledon explants cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Reports 9:549–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill JD, Rounsley S, Spencer A, Todd G, Rhodes MJC (1991) The use of polymerase chain reaction in plant transformation studies. Plant Cell Reports 10:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain RK, Chowdhury JB, Sharma DR, Friedt W (1988) Genotypic and media effects on plant regeneration from cotyledon explant cultures of some Brassica species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ culture 14:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plant: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Reporter 5:387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M (1979) Biosynthesis and action of ethylene. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 30:533–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton L, Browse J (1991) Fascile transformation of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports 10:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews H, Bharathan N, Litz RE, Narayanan KR, Rao PS, Bhatia CR (1990) Transgenic plants of mustard Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss. Plant Sci 72:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney MM, Walker JM, Sharma KK (1989) High efficiency transformation of Brassica napus using Agrobacterium vectors. Plant Cell Reports 8:238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay A, Topfer R, Pradhan AK, Sodhi YS, Steinbiss HH, Schell J, Pental D (1991) Efficient regeneration of Brassica oleracca hypocotyl protoplasts and high frequency genetic transformation by direct DNA uptake. Plant Cell Reports 10:375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:472–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata M, Orton T (1987) Callus initiation and regeneration capacities in Brassica species. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 11:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhulu SB, Chopra VL (1988) Species specific shoot regeneration response of cotyledonary explants of Brassicas. Plant Cell Reports 7:104–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Pua EC, Mehra Palta A, Nagy F, Chua NH (1987) Transgenic plants of Brassica napus L. Bio/Technology 5:815–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Pua EC (1990) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from hypocotyl protoplasts of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss. Plant Sci 68:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnhauser L, Medgyesy P, Czake M, Dix PJ, Marton L (1987) Stimulation of shoot regeneration in Triticum aestivum and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Viv. tissue culture using the ethylene inhibitor AgNO3. Plant Cell Reports 6:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Radke SE, Andrews BM, Moloney MM, Crouch ML, Kridl JC, Knauf VC (1988) Transformation of Brassica napus using Agrobacterium tumefaciens: developmentally regulated expression of a reintroduced napin gene. Theor Appl Genet 75:685–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Willmitzer L (1988) High efficiency Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf and cotyledon explants. Plant Cell Reports 7:583–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrammeijer B, Sijmons PC, van den Elzen PJM, Hoekema A (1990) Meristem transformation of sunflower via Agrobacterium. Plant Cell Reports 9:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KK, Bhojwani SS, Thorpe TA (1990) Factors affecting high frequency differentiation of shoots and roots from cotyledon expiants of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Plant Sci 66:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Songstad DD, Duncan DR, Wildholm JM (1988) Effect of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, silver nitrate and norbornadiene on plant regeneration from maize callus cultures. Plant Cell Reports 7:262–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson EB, Erickson LR (1989) Haploid transformation in Brassica napus using an octopine-producing strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Theor Appl Genet 78:831–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer R, Gronenborn B, Schell J, Steinbiss HH (1989) Uptake and transient expression of chimeric gene in seed-derived embryos. The Plant Cell 1:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer R, Prols M, Schell J, Steinbiss HH (1988) Transient gene expression in tobacco protoplasts: II. Comparison of the reporter gene systems for CAT. NPTII and GUS. Plant Cell Reports 7:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M (1990) Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: Splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220:245–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SF, Hoffman NE (1984) Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35:155–189

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by C.F. Quiros

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, A., Arumugam, N., Nandakumar, P.B.A. et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of oilseed Brassica campestris: Transformation frequency is strongly influenced by the mode of shoot regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 11, 506–513 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236266

Key words

Navigation