Summary
While human subjects lift small objects using the precision grip between the tips of the fingers and thumb the ratio between the grip force and the load force (i.e. the vertical lifting force) is adapted to the friction between the object and the skin. The present report provides direct evidence that signals in tactile afferent units are utilized in this adaptation. Tactile afferent units were readily excited by small but distinct slips between the object and the skin revealed as vibrations in the object. Following such afferent slip responses the force ratio was upgraded to a higher, stable value which provided a safety margin to prevent further slips. The latency between the onset of the a slip and the appearance of the ratio change (74 ±9 ms) was about half the minimum latency for intended grip force changes triggered by cutaneous stimulation of the fingers. This indicated that the motor responses were automatically initiated. If the subjects were asked to very slowly separate their thumb and the opposing finger while the object was held in air, grip force reflexes originating from afferent slip responses appeared to counteract the voluntary command, but the maintained upgrading of the force ratio was suppressed. In experiments with weak electrical cutaneous stimulation delivered through the surfaces of the object it was established that tactile input alone could trigger the upgrading of the force ratio. Although, varying in responsiveness, each of the three types of tactile units which exhibit a pronounced dynamic sensitivity (FA I, FA II and SA I units) could reliably signal these slips. Similar but generally weaker afferent responses, sometimes followed by small force ratio changes, also occurred in the FA I and the SA I units in the absence of detectable vibrations events. In contrast to the responses associated with clear vibratory events, the weaker afferent responses were probably caused by localized frictional slips, i.e. slips limited to small fractions of the skin area in contact with the object. Indications were found that the early adjustment to a new frictional condition, which may appear soon (ca. 0.1–0.2 s) after the object is initially gripped, might depend on the vigorous responses in the FA I units during the initial phase of the lifts (see Westling and Johansson 1987). The role of the tactile input in the adaptation of the force coordination to the frictional condition is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnet M, Requin J (1982) Long loop and spinal reflexes in man during preparation for intended directional hand movements. J Neurosci 2: 90–96
Beradelli A, Day BL, Marsden CD, Rothwell JC (1985) Habituation of the human long latency stretch reflex. J Physiol (Lond) 362: 27P
Burgess PR, Perl ER (1973) Cutaneous mechanoreceptors andn ociceptors. In: Iggo A (ed) Somatosensory system. Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. II. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–78
Caccia MR, McComas AJ, Upton ARM, Blogg T (1973) Cutaneous reflexes in small muscles of the hand. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat: 36: 960–977
Crenna P, Frigo C (1984) Evidence of phase-dependent nociceptive reflexes during locomotion in man. Exp Neurol 85: 336–345
Darton K, Lippold OCJ, Shahani M, Shahani U (1985) Longlatency spinal reflexes in humans. J Neurophysiol 53: 1604–1618
Eklund G, Hagbarth KE, Torebjörk E (1978) Exteroceptive vibration-induced finger flexion reflex in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 41: 438–443
Evarts EV, Tanji J (1974) Gating of motor cortex reflexes by prior instruction. Brain Res 71: 479–494
Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977) Effects of related sensory inputs on motor performance in man studied through changes in perceived heaviness. J Physiol (Lond) 272: 653–672
Garnett R, Stephens JA (1980) The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. J Physiol (Lond) 303: 351–364
Garnett R, Stephens JA (1981) Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units in the first human dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. J Physiol (Lond) 311: 463–473
Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system, Vol 2. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, MD, pp 1179–1236
Hammond PH (1956) The influences of prior instructions to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuro-muscular response. J Physiol (Lond) 132: 17P-18P
Hagbarth KE, Finer BL (1963) The plasticity of human withdrawal reflexes to noxious skin stimuli in lower limbs. In: Moruzzi G, Fessard A, Jasper HH (eds) Brain mechanisms. Progress Brain Research, Vol 19. Eisevier, Amsterdam, pp 65–81
Hagbarth KE, Kugelberg E (1958) Plasticity of the human abdominal skin reflex. Brain 81: 305–318
Houk JC, Rymers WZ (1981) Neural control of muscle length and tension. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system, Vol 2. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, MD, pp 257–323
Hulliger M, Nordh E, Thelin AE, Vallbo ÅB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 291: 233–249
Iggo A (1974) Cutaneous receptors. In: Hubbard JI (ed) Peripheral nervous system. Plenum Press, New York, pp 347–404
Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. Raven, New York
Jenner JR, Stephens JA (1982) Cutaneous reflex responses and their central nervous pathways studied in man. J Physiol (Lond) 333: 405–419
Johansson RS (1978) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol (Lond) 281: 101–123
Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 286: 283–300
Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci 6: 27–31
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984a) Influences of cutaneous sensory input on the motor coordination during precision manipulation. In: von Euler C, Franzen O, Lindblom U, Ottoson D (eds) Somatosensory mechanisms. Macmillan Press, London, pp 249–260
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984b) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56: 550–564
Johnson KO (1983) Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture discrimination. Fed Proceed 42: 2542–2527
Knibestöl M, Vallbo ÅB (1970) Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. Acta physiol scand 80: 178–195
Lund JP, Olsson KÅ (1983) The importance of reflexes and their control during jaw movement. Trends Neurosci 6: 458–463
Loo CKC, McCloskey DI (1985) Effects of prior instruction and anaesthesia on long-latency responses to stretch in the long flexor of the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 365: 285–296
Martin JH, Ghez C (1985) Task-related coding of stimulus and response in cat motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 57: 427–442
Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1976) Servo action in the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 257: 1–44
Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1977) The sensory mechanisms of servoaction in human muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 265: 521–535
Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1985) New observations on the human stretch reflex. J Physiol (Lond) 360: 51P
Marsden CD, Rothwell JC, Day BL (1983) Long-latency automatic responses to muscle stretch in man: origin and function. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven Press, New York, pp 509–539
Matthews PBC (1984a) Evidence from the use of vibration that the human long-latency stretch reflex depends upon spindle secondary afferents. J Physiol (Lond) 348: 383–415
Matthews PBC (1984b) The contrasting stretch reflex responses of the long and short flexor muscles in the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 348: 545–558
Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26: 59–72
Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J Neurophysiol 46: 1204–1225
Rood ON (1860) On contraction of the muscles induced by contact with bodies in vibration. Am J Sci Arts 24: 449
Tatton WG, Bruce IC (1981) Comment: a schema for the interactions between motor programs and sensory input. Can J Physiol 59: 691–699
Torebjörk HE, Hagbarth KE, Eklund G (1978) Tonic finger flexion reflex induced by vibratory activation of digital mechanoreceptors. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 197–203
Westling G, Johansson RS (1983) Pinch reflexes. Neurosci Lett Suppl 14: 402
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984a) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53: 277–284
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984b) Tactile afferent signals and sensori-motor memory influencing the force coordination during precision grip between tips of fingers and thumb. Neurosci Lett Suppl 18: 259
Westling G, Johansson RS (1987) Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp Brain Res 66: 128–140
Young RR (1973) The clinical significance of exteroceptive reflexes. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, Vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 697–712
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, R.S., Westling, G. Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 66, 141–154 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236210
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236210