Skip to main content
Log in

Performance comparison of assembly systems with fixed and flexible cycle times

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The traditional assembly system consists of a series of balanced workstations operating at the same rate with fixed cycle times. Recent advances in technology allow more flexible assembly systems, in which workstations operate independently and cycle times vary from job to job.

This article develops an analytical model for comparing the throughputs (jobs per hour) of assembly systems with fixed and variable cycle times. The throughputs are compared on a common basis by requiring that both systems allow sufficient processing time to ensure product quality and that they have the same total times in system per job.

Results indicate that an assembly system with variable cycle times can operate at a significantly higher throughput than one with fixed cycle times, provided there is sufficient buffer storage space between workstations to accommodate queueing. This benefit must be weighed against possible increased capital investment and practical considerations associated with system control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AndersonD.R., and MoodieC.L., “Optimal Buffer Storage Capacity in Production Line Systems,” International Journal of Production Research 7(3), pp. 233–240 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • AndreasenM.; KahlerS.; and LundT.; Design for Assembly, IFS (Publications) Ltd., Bedford, U.K., and Springer-Verlag, New York (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • BasuR.N., “The Interstage Buffer Storage Capacity of Non-Powered Assembly Lines: A Simple Mathematical Approach,” International Journal of Production Research 15(4), pp. 365–382 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • BaybarsI., “A Survey of Exact Algorithms for the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem,” Management Science 32(8), pp. 909–932 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • BlumenfeldD.E., “Performance Characteristics of Assembly Systems with Fixed and Variable Processing Times,” Research Publication GMR-5912, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • BoothroydG., “Economics of Assembly Systems,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 1(1), pp. 111–125 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • BoothroydG., and DewhurstP., Design for Assembly, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • BoothroydG.; PoliC.; and MurchL.E.; Automatic Assembly. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • BurnsL.D., and DaganzoC.F., “Assembly Line Job Sequencing Principles,” International Journal of Production Research 25(1), pp. 71–99 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • BuzacottJ.A., “Automatic Transfer Lines with Buffer Stocks,” International Journal of Production Research 5(3), pp. 183–200 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J.A., Notes on “Flow Lines,” Private communication (1988a).

  • BuzacottJ.A., “Abandoning the Moving Assembly Line: Models of Human Operators and Job Sequencing,” WATMIMS Research Group Working Paper 88–02, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario (1988b).

    Google Scholar 

  • BuzacottJ.A., and YaoD.D., “Flexible Manufacturing Systems: A Review of Analytical Models,” Management Science 32(7), pp. 890–905 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardan, J., “De Cubo et Rebus Aequalibus Numero,” Ars Magna, XI, Nuremberg (1545).

  • ChowW., “Buffer Capacity Analysis for Sequential Production Lines with Variable Process Times,” International Journal of Production Research 25(8), pp. 1183–1196 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • ConwayR.; MaxwellW.; McClainJ.O.; and ThomasL.J., “The Role of Work-in-Process Inventory in Serial Production Lines,” Operations Research 36(2), pp. 229–241 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • CooperR.B., Introduction to Queueing Theory, Macmillan Company, New York (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • CoxD.R., and SmithW.L., Queues, Methuen, London (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • DudleyN.A., “Work-Time Distributions,” International Journal of Production Research 2, pp. 137–144 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D.R., “A General Line Balancing Model,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference, AIIE, Tampa, Florida, pp. 230–235 (1968).

  • GershwinS.B., “An Efficient Decomposition Method for the Approximate Evaluation of Tandem Queues with Finite Storage Space and Blocking,” Operations Research 35(3), pp. 291–305 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • HillierF.S., and BolingR.W., “The Effect of Some Design Factors on the Efficiency of Production Lines with Variable Operation Times,” Journal of Industrial Engineering 17(12), pp. 651–658 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • IgnallE.J., “A Review of Assembly Line Balancing,” Journal of Industrial Engineering 16(4), pp. 244–254 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • JonejaD., and MaxwellW.L., “Buffer Placement in Sequential Production Lines: Considerations of Processing Time Variability,” Technical Report No. 700, School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, M.; Suri, R.J. and Sanders, J.L., “Analytical Performance Models for Closed-Loop Flexible Assembly Systems,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 1(1) (1988).

  • KendallD.G., “Some Problems in the Theory of Queues,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 13, pp. 151–185 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • KimuraT., “A Two-Moment Approximation for the Mean Watting Time in the GI/G/s Queue,” Management Science 32(6), pp. 751–763 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • KnottA.D., “The Inefficiency of a Series of Work Stations: A Simple Formula,” International Journal of Production Research 8(2), pp. 109–119 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • KnottK., and SuryR.J., “A Study of Work-Time Distributions on Unpaced Tasks,” IIE Transactions 19(1), pp. 50–55 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, W., and Langenbach-Belz, M., “Approximate Formulae for the Delay in the Queueing System GI/G/l,” Proceedings of the 8th International Teletraffic Congress, Melbourne, Australia, no. 235, pp. 1–8 (1976). (Concise version “Approximate Formulae for General Single Server Systems with Single and Batch Arrivals,” published in Angewandte Informatik pp. 396–402 (1978)).

  • LittleJ.D.C., “A Proof for the Queueing Formula: LW,” Operations Research 9(3), pp. 383–387 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarshallK.T., “Some Inequalities in Queueing,” Operations Research 16(3), pp. 651–668 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • MoodieC.L. A Heuristic Method of Assembly Line Balancing for Assumptions of Constant or Variable Work Element Times, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, C.L., and Young, H.H., “A Heuristic Method of Assembly Line Balancing for Assumptions of Constant or Variable Work Element Times,” Journal of Industrial Engineering 16(1) (1965)

  • MuthE.J., “The Production Rate of a Series of Work Stations with Variable Service Times, International Journal of Production Research 11(2), pp. 155–169 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • PollockS.M.; BirgeJ.R.; and AldenJ.M., “Approximation Analysis for Open Tandem Queues with Blocking: Exponential and General Service Time Distributions,” Technical Report 85–30, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • SakesegawaH., “An Approximation Formula 222–1,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, part A, 29 pp. 67–75 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • ShanthikumarJ.G., and BuzacottJ.A., “On the Approximations to the Single Server Queue,” International Journal of Production Research 18(6), pp. 761–773 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • SilvermanF.N., and CarterJ.C., “A Cost-Based Methodology for Stochastic Line Balancing with Intermittent Line Stoppages,” Management Science 32(4), pp. 455–463 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • SmithD.E., A Source Book in Mathematics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • SteckeK.E., “Formulation and Solution of Nonlinear Integer Production Planning Problems for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Management Science 29(3), pp. 273–288 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • SteckeK.E. “Design, Planning, Scheduling, and Control Problems of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in K.E.Stecke and R.Suri (eds.), Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company, Basel, Switzerland (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • SuriR. “An Overview of Evaluative Models for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in K.E.Stecke and R.Suri (eds.), Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company, Basel, Switzerland (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • UdomkesmaleeN., “Work-in-Process Inventory for Assembly Systems with Variable Processing Times,” Research Publication GMR-5981, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • UdomkesmaleeN., and DaganzoC.F., “Impact of Parallel Processing on Job Sequences in Flexible Assembly Systems,” International Journal of Production Research 27(1), pp. 73–89 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • WhitneyC.K., and SuriR.J., “Decision Aids for FMS Part and Machine Selection,” in K.E.Stecke and R.Suri (eds.), Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, J.C. Baltzer AG. Scientific Publishing Company, Basel, Switzerland (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • WhittW., “The Queueing Network Analyzer,” Bell System Technical Journal 62(9), pp. 2779–2815 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • WhittW., “The Best Order for Queues in Series,” Management Science 31(4), pp. 475–487 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • YuP.S., “On Accuracy Improvement and Applicability Conditions of Diffusion Approximation with Applications to Modeling of Computer Systems,” Technical Report No. TR-129, Digital Systems Laboratory, Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumenfeld, D.E. Performance comparison of assembly systems with fixed and flexible cycle times. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 1, 207–222 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235265

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235265

Keywords

Navigation