Summary
The post-stimulus-time histograms of single unit responses recorded extracellularly from simple and complex cells in the paralyzed cat's striate cortex were compared both with the averaged visual evoked potential (VEP) recorded with the same stainless steel microelectrode and with the averaged surface VEP recorded with a silver-ball electrode applied close to the locus of microelectrode penetration. Diffuse and patterned white light stimuli, projected on a tangent screen in front of the animal, were used monocularly and binocularly at an intensity range over 2.5 log units. The latencies of spike responses to contralateral stimuli were found on the average shorter than those to ipsilateral and generally equal to those following binocular stimulation. The reciprocals of latencies as function of log stimulus intensity of the surface VEPs had the same gradient as those from averaged unit responses. In recordings from any given cell, the spike discharges displayed a fixed phase relationship to the local and another to the surface VEP, but this was not necessarily identical in different cells. These discharges may be related to the negative and positive phases of both types of slow waves. The surface and local VEPs elicited by binocular diffuse light stimulation represent the algebraic summation of the VEPs produced by ipsi- and contralateral stimulations, which confirms and expands earlier studies. No algebraic summation was found in the spike response, the sum of the two monocular responses being in most cases larger than the binocular.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach, E., Beller, A.J., Henkes, H.E., Goldhaber, G.: Electrical potentials of retina and cortex of cats evoked by monocular and binocular photic stimulation. Vision Res. 1, 166–182 (1961).
—: The effect of monocular and binocular photic stimulation upon the electric potentials of retina and visual cortex of the anaesthetized cat. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 144, 257–258 (1962).
Bishop, P.O., Jeremy, D., Lance, J.W.: The optic nerve. Properties of a central tract. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 121, 415–432 (1953).
— Kozak, W., Vakkur, G.J.: Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 163, 466–502 (1962).
Burns, B.D., Heron, W., Grafstein, B.: Responses of cerebral cortex to diffuse monocular and binocular stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol. 198, 200–204 (1960).
Creutzfeldt, O., Ito, M.: Functional synaptic organization of primary visual cortex neurones in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 324–352 (1968).
— Rosina, A., Ito, M., Probst, W.: Visual evoked responses of single cells and of the EEG in primary visual area of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 127–139 (1969).
Creutzfeldt, O. Spehlmann, R., Lehmann, D.: Veränderung der Neuronaktivität des visuellen Cortex durch Reizung der Substantia reticularis mesencephali. In: Neurophysiologie und Psychophysik des Visuellen Systems, Symposion Freiburg/Br. 1960, pp. 351–363. Ed. by R. Jung und H. Kornhuber. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1961.
Denney, D., Baumgartner, G., Adorjani, C.: Responses of cortical neurones to stimulation of the visual afferent radiations. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 265–272 (1968).
Fox, S.S., O'Brien, J.H.: Duplication of evoked potential waveform by curve of probability of firing of a single cell. Science 147, 888–890 (1965).
Fromm, G.H., Bond, H.W.: The relationship between neuron activity and cortical steady potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 22, 159–166 (1967).
Fukada, Y., Motokawa, K., Norton, A.C., Tasaki, K.: Functional significance of conduction velocity in the transfer of flicker information in the optic nerve of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 29, 698–714 (1966).
Gouras, P., Armington, J.C., Kropfl, W.J., Gunkel, R.D.: Electronic computation of human retinal and brain responses to light stimulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 115, 763–775 (1964).
Grützner, A., Grüsser, O.-J., Baumgartner, G.: Reaktionen einzelner Neurone im optischen Cortex der Katze nach elektrischer Reizung des Nervus opticus. Arch. f. Psychiat. Nervenkr. 197, 377–404 (1958).
Henry, D.H., Bishop, P.O., Coombs, J.S.: Inhibitory and sub-liminal excitatory receptive fields of simple units in cat striate cortex. Vision Res. 9, 1289–1296 (1969).
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962).
Pettigrew, J.D., Nikara, T., Bishop, P.O.: Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 373–390 (1968a).
—: Binocular interaction on single units in eat striate cortex: Simulateneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 391–410 (1968b).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by P.H.S. grant (project 06-810-2) from the U.S. Dept of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minke, B., Auerbach, E. Latencies and correlation in single units and visual evoked potentials in the cat striate cortex following monocular and binocular stimulations. Exp Brain Res 14, 409–422 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235036
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235036