Skip to main content
Log in

Stable transformation via particle bombardment in two different soybean regeneration systems

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Biolistics® particle delivery system for the transformation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) was evaluated in two different regeneration systems. The first system was multiple shoot proliferation from shoot tips obtained from immature zygotic embryos of the cultivar Williams 82, and the second was somatic embryogenesis from a long term proliferative suspension culture of the cultivar Fayette. Bombardment of shoot tips with tungsten particles, coated with precipitated DNA containing the gene for β-glucuronidase (GUS), produced GUS-positive sectors in 30% of the regenerated shoots. However, none of the regenerants which developed into plants continued to produce GUS positive tissue. Bombardment of embryogenic suspension cultures produced GUS positive globular somatic embryos which proliferated into GUS positive somatic embryos and plants. An average of 4 independent transgenic lines were generated per bombarded flask of an embryogenic suspension. Particle bombardment delivered particles into the first two cell layers of either shoot tips or somatic embryos. Histological analysis indicated that shoot organogenesis appeared to involve more than the first two superficial cell layers of a shoot tip, while somatic embryo proliferation occurred from the first cell layer of existing somatic embryos. The different transformation results obtained with these two systems appeared to be directly related to differences in the cell types which were responsible for regeneration and their accessibility to particle penetration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chee, P., Fober, K.A., and Slightom, J.L., (1989) Plant. Physiol. 91: 1212–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, P. (1990a) Ann. Bot. 66 (4): 379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, P. (1990b) Physiol. Plant. 79 (1): 210–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, P., McCabe, D.E., Martinell, B.J., and Swain, W.F., (1990) Trends Biotechnol. 8: 145–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, P., and McCabe, D.E., (1992) The Plant Journal. 2(3): 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, G.M. and Gilbert, W. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81: 1991–1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta, S.L., Wood, J., and Hicks, J.B., (1983) Plant Mol. Bio. Reporter. 1: 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, A.V.P., Cutter, E.G., and Davey, M.R. (1983) Protoplasma 117: 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, J.J. and Nagasawa, A. (1988) Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. 15: 125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, J.J. and McMullen, M. (1991) In Vitro Cell. Dev Biol. 27P: 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg, O.L., Miller, R.A., Ojima, K. (1968) Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchee, M.A., Connor-Ward, D.V., Newell, C.A., McDonnell, R. E., Sato, S., Gasser, C.S., Fischhoff, D.A., Re, D.B., Fraley, R.T., and, Horsch, R.B. (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 915–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, R.A., Burgess, S.M. and Hirsh, D. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83: 8447–8451

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D.A. (1940) McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Klein, T.M., Gradziel, T., Fromm, M.E., and Sanford, J.C. (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 559–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Maataoui, M.E., Espagnac, H., and Michaux-Ferriere, N. (1990) Bot. 66: 183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, G. and Williams, E.G. (1985) Ann. Bot. 56: 619–630

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D.E., Swain, W.F., Martinell, B.J., and Christou, P., (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 923–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W.A., Hoffman, L.M., Hildegrand, D.F., Williams, E.G., and Collins, G.B, (1989) Plant Cell Rep. 7: 615–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F.,and Maniatis T., 2nd edition. 1989

  • Southern, E.M. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98: 503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussex, I. (1989) Cell 56: 225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. and Vasil, I. (1991) Plant Cell Rep. 10: 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Klein, T.M., Fromm, M., Cao, J., Sanford, J.C., and Wu, R., (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 11: 433–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J.H. and Atherly, A.G. (1990) Plant Cell Rep. 8 (9): 542–545

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. K. Vasil

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, S., Newell, C., Kolacz, K. et al. Stable transformation via particle bombardment in two different soybean regeneration systems. Plant Cell Reports 12, 408–413 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234702

Keywords

Navigation