Skip to main content
Log in

Improved flax regeneration from hypocotyls using thidiazuron as a cytokinin source

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of thidiazuron, benzyladenine and zeatin were tested with respect to bud regeneration of different flax explants from hypocotyls, cotyledons and apices of two fibre varieties (Ariane, Viking) and one linseed variety (Antarès). These three cytokinins were tested either alone or in combination with naphthalene acetic acid, indole acetic acid or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Hypocotyls were the most responsive explants. Thidiazuron was significantly the most effective followed by benzyladenine, and then zeatin, in inducing organogenesis from hypocotyl segments. The optimal thidiazuron concentration for bud regeneration from hypocotyls was 0.1–0.3 μM in combination with 0.01 μM of naphthalene acetic acid. Six days after plating, shoot initials began to appear on hypocotyl sections compared with ten to fifteen days when using benzyladenine or zeatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basiran N, Armitage P, Scott J, Draper J (1987) Plant Cell Rep. 6:396–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevreau E, Dufour M, Duron M (1988) In: Les Sratégies De Selection Face aux Technologies Modernes Moet Hennessy Conference (p22), Paris

  • Dong JZ, McHughen A (1993) Plant Cell Rep. 88:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasolo F, Zimmerman RH, Fordham I (1989) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 16:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Shyluk JP (1976) Bot. Gaz. 137:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller R (1953) Ann. Sci. nat., Bot. Biol. veg. Paris 14:1–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn AG, Clarcke LE, Blundy KS, White J (1983) J. mol. appl. Genet. 2:211–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MC, McHughen A (1988) Plant Cell Rep. 7:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerns HR, Meyer MM (1986) Hortscience 21:1209–1210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane D (1979) Physiol. Plant. 45:260–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Link G, Eggers V (1946) Bot. Gaz. 107:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall GJ, Davidson D, Millam S (1992) J. Plant Physiol. 140:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Hughen A (1984) J. Plant Physiol. 117:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Hughen A (1989) Plant Cell Rep. 8:445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews VH, Narayanaswamy S (1976) Z. Pflanzenzuecht. 80:436–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok MC, Mok DWS, Armstrong DJ, Shudo K, Isoga Y, Okamoto T (1982) Phytochemistry 21:1509–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel G, Wetmore RH (1951) Am. J. Bot. 38:141–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray BE, Handyside RJ, Keller WA (1977) Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 19:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkirk K van, Fordham I, Zimmerman RH (1987) Hortscience 21:516–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe DH, Bell GM (1981) Plant Sci. Lett. 21:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz HJ (1988) In: Les Strategies De Selection Face aux Technologies Modernes Moet Hennessy Conference (p66), Paris,France

  • Thomas JC, Katterman FR (1986) Plant Physiol. 81:681–683

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Pelletier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bretagne, B., Chupeau, MC., Chupeau, Y. et al. Improved flax regeneration from hypocotyls using thidiazuron as a cytokinin source. Plant Cell Reports 14, 120–124 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233774

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233774

Key words

Navigation