Skip to main content
Log in

Economic analysis of the impact of anti-discrimination legislation based on familial status

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Farlow, Gale (1983). ‘Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson: A Victory for Children in Rental Housing - Implications for Further Expansion of the Unruh Civil Rights Act.’ Golden Gate University Law Review 13: pp. 697–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, Paul R. and Dean E. Lively Jr. (1989). ‘Are You Discriminating?’ Journal of Housing 46: pp. 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntermann, Karl L. and Stephan Norrbin (1987). ‘Explaining the Variability of Apartment Rents.’ AREUEA Journal 15: pp. 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans (1980). ‘Measuring Restrictive Rental Practices Affecting Families with Children: A National Survey.’ Office of Policy Planning and Research, Department of Housing and Urban Development.

  • Miles, Susan A. (1983). ‘Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson: Discrimination in Rental Housing Against Families with Children.’ California Law Review 71: pp. 1324–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Donald F. (1976). Multivariate Statistical Methods, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Paul (1984). ‘Familial Discrimination in Rental Housing: The Halet Decision.’ St. Louis University Law Journal 28: pp. 1085–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaliano, Donald F. (1986). ‘Measuring the Efficiency Cost of Rental Control.’ AREUEAJournal 14: pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goebel, P.R., Rosenberg, S.B. Economic analysis of the impact of anti-discrimination legislation based on familial status. Policy Sci 25, 161–174 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233746

Keywords

Navigation