Skip to main content
Log in

Plant regeneration from sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) hypocotyls cultured in vitro and flow cytometric nuclear DNA analysis of regenerants

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple and reproducible protocol for regeneration of sugarbeet plants from hypocotyl expiants derived from 21 day-old-seedlings has been developed. Expiants were cultured on MS medium containing 0.3 mg/l N6-Benzylaminopurine, 0.1 mg/l Naphthalene Acetic Acid, 50 mg/l adenine and 0.5% (w/v) fructose, 0.5% (w/v) sucrose and 0.5% (w/v) glucose to induce the formation of organogenic calli (2.3% to 46.5% organogenic efficiency, depending on populations). Shoot formation was induced in callus cultures of more than 1600 genotypes. Physiological age affected culture response and different genotypes had different temperature optima for organogenesis. Following transfer of regenerated plants to the greenhouse, DNA determinations were made to study the stability of ploidy. Differences in ploidy were observed in plants derived from both shortterm and long-term callus cultures; diploid true-to-type regenerants were 96% and 83%, respectively, from shortterm and long-term callus cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MS:

Murashige and Skoog medium

BAP:

N6-benzylaminopurine

IBA:

Indolebutyric acid

NAA:

Naphthalene acetic acid

TIBA:

2,3,5 triiodobenzoic Acid

GM:

Germination Medium

IM:

Induction Medium

RG:

Regeneration Medium

RM:

Rooting Medium

References

  • Atanassov A, Kikindonov T, Antonova G (1976). Proc. Int. Symp.: Experimental mutation in plants. Varna, Bulgarie 14–17 October, 1976 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Bergounioux C, Tallet S, Marie D (1991a). Chapt 5.3. I Negrutiu and G Gharti-Chhetri (Eds) Birkhäuser, Basel, Zurich, 1991.

  • Brown S, Devaux P, Marie D, Bergounioux C, Petti P (1991b). Biofutur 105: 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catlin D (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catlin D, Ochoa O, Mac Cormick S, Quiros C (1988) Plant Cell Rep 7: 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato F (1990) Caryologia 43: 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Greef W, Jacobs M (1979) Plant Sci. Lett. 17: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat A, Godhe W, Vogelzang M (1987) Plant Breeding 99: 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrez C, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1989) Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 462–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrez C, Tétu T, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1988) J. Exp. Botany 39: 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doley W, Saunders J (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8: 22–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freytag AH, Anand SC, Rao-Arelli AP, Owens LD (1988) Plant Cell Rep 7: 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith D, Harkins K, Ayres N, Sharma D, Firoozabady E (1983) Science 220: 1049–1051.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groose R, Bingham E (1984) Crop. Sci. 24: 655–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker M, Nabors M (1977). Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 84: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krens FA, Jamar D (1989) J. Plant Physiol. 134: 651–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konwar B, Coutts R (1990) In Nijkamp H.J.J, Van Der Plas L.H.W., Van Aartrijk J. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp114–118.

  • Meins F (1983) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 34: 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan P, Walton P (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie G, Short K, Davey M (1989) J. Exp. Bot. 211: 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders J, Doley W (1986) J. Plant Physiol. 124: 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders J, Mahomey M (1982) Euphytica 31: 801–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders J, Shin K (1986) Crop Science 26: 1240–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tétu T (1989) Ph D thesis Université Paris VI, 137pp.

  • Tétu T, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1987) J. Exp. Bot. 38: 506–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geyt J, Jacobs M (1985) Plant Cell Rep 4: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

communicated by M. R. Davey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacq, B., Tétu, T., Sangwan, R.S. et al. Plant regeneration from sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) hypocotyls cultured in vitro and flow cytometric nuclear DNA analysis of regenerants. Plant Cell Reports 11, 329–333 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233359

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233359

Keywords

Navigation