Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro production of flowering shoots in ‘German Red’ carnation: effect of uniconazole and gibberellic acid

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Callus regenerated near the base of senescing petals of flower bud explants of ‘German Red’ carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) produced adventitious flowering microshoots on MS-medium containing benzylaminopurine (8.9 μM) and naphthaleneacetic acid (2.7 μM). When these microshoots were subcultured with some callus, additional adventitious flowering microshoots were produced from the callus. The production of adventitious flowering shoots continued for many subcultures spanning a period of more than two years. Uniconazole (6.9 μM) increased the number of adventitious shoots formed by as much as two-fold but decreased shoot length by about 50%. In contrast, GA3 (2.9 μM) decreased adventitious shoot formation and increased shoot length. Regardless of the growth regulator treatment, virtually all of the adventitious shoots produced flower buds. Thus, the growth regulators influenced flowering only indirectly by altering the number of adventitious shoots produced in vitro. These results demonstrate that the flowering habit of the adventitious shoots of ‘German Red’ carnation is highly persistent and the flowering stimulus continues to be transmitted to the newly formed microshoots through the callus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Khayri JM, Huang FH, Morelock TE, Lane FE (1991) HortScience 26: 1422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis TD, Sankhla N, Sankhla D, George SW, Parsons JM (1993) Proc. Sou. Nurseryman's Assoc 38: in press.

  • Fletcher RA, Arnold V (1986) Physiol. Plant. 66: 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey L, Janick J (1991) J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 1108–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimelli F, Ginatta G, Venturo R, Positano S, Buiatti M (1984) Riv. Ortoflorofrutt. It 68: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higashiuchi Y, Kido K, Ichii T, Nakanishi T, Kawai Y, Ozaki T (1990) Scientia Hortic. 41: 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izumi K, Nakagawa S, Kobayashi M, Oshio H, Sakurai A, Takahashi N (1988) Plant Cell Physiol. 29: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakehi M (1979) Bull. Hiroshima Agric. Coll. 6: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshem B (1986) HortScience 21: 320–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshem B (1990) In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. II, Somaclonal Variation in Crop Improvement, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeguer J, Arconado MC, Mele E (1993) Scientia Hortic. 54: 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mii M, Buiatti M, Gimelli F (1990) In: Ammirato PV, Evan RD, Sharp WR, Bajaj YPS (eds) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol. 5, Ornam. Species, McGraw-Hill, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM, Kaul V, Hutchison JF, Richards D (1991) Ann. Bot. 67: 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent G, Wardley-Richardson T, Lu CY (1991) Plant Cell Rpts. 10: 477–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roest S, Bokelman GS (1981) Scientia Hortic. 14: 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankhla N, Davis TD, Gehlot HS, Upadhyaya A, Sankhla A, Sankhla D (1991) J Plant Growth Regul. 10: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankhla D, Davis TD, Sankhla N (1993a) Plant Cell Rpts. 13: 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankhla D, Davis TD, Sankhla N, Upadhyaya A (1993b) Proc. Plant Growth Reg Soc Amer 20: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R (1982) Hortic. Rev. 2: 106–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EF, Roberts AV, Mottley J (1990) Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 21: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel-Roy P, Saad S (1986) Plant Sci. 47: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B, Galletta PD (1988) HortScience 23: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Altvorst AC, Koehorst MJ, Bruinsma T, Jansen J, Custers JBB, deJong J, Dons JMM (1992) Scientia Hortic. 51: 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch WC (1989) Perennial garden colors for Texas and the south. Taylor Pub, Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv M (1990) Acta Hortic. 280: 207–214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv M, Ariel T (1991) J Plant Growth Regul. 10: 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sankhla, D., Davis, T.D., Sankhla, N. et al. In vitro production of flowering shoots in ‘German Red’ carnation: effect of uniconazole and gibberellic acid. Plant Cell Reports 13, 514–518 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232947

Key Words

Navigation