Skip to main content
Log in

Field performance of micropropagated, macropropagated, and seed-derived propagules of three Eucalyptus grandis ortets

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tree size, survival, and coppicing of micropropagated plantlets, macropropagated cuttings, and seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden were monitored through 57 months in a study in southern Florida to assess propagation options. Two plantlet lines developed by direct micropropagation and orchard open-pollinated seedlings from three ortets were compared in the main study. Rooted cuttings from up to four ramets of each of the three ortets and another ortet were examined in an adjacent supplemental study. Freezes at six and 16 months killed most initial and first-coppice stems to the ground. Most developmental differences in the main study were consistent from ages 2 to 57 months. Propagation by ortet interactions were observed beginning at 21 months, due to the poor performance of seedlings of one ortet after the second freeze. At 57 months, no differences in tree height, DBH, volume, or survival were detected between plantlet lines and between rooted cuttings and plantlets, but seedlings were inferior to plantlets and cuttings. Vegetative propagules had more uniform tree size at every age, with typically less than one-half the variability observed among seedlings. Even though plantlets and cuttings may be more expensive to produce, they have numerous advantages over seedlings for E. grandis plantation establishment in Florida.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Bell, DT, PG Van der Moezel, IJ Bennett, JA McComb, CF Wilkins, and SCB Marshall. 1993. For. Ecol. & Man. 57(1–4): 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franclet, A, and M Boulay. 1982. Aust. For. Res. 13: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, TF, GF Meskimen, and EC Franklin. (1983). USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rpt. SE-23. 43p.

  • Khuspe, SS, PK Gupta, DK Kulkarni, U Mehta, and AF Mascarenhas. 1987. Can. J. For. Res. 17(11): 1361–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeth, CC. (1994). Forest Science (in press)

  • Meskimen, GF, DL Rockwood, and KV Reddy. 1987. New Forests 3: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood, DL, EE Warrag, J Bryan, and K Kratz. (1988). In: Proceedings 5th. Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, November 1–3, (1988), Memphis, TN. p. 317–326.

  • Rockwood, DL, EE Warrag, K Javanshir, and K Kratz. (1989). In: Proceedings 20th. Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, June 27–29, (1989), Charleston, SC. p. 403–410.

  • SAS. (1988). SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

  • Warrag, EI, MS Lesney, and DL Rockwood. 1989a. Plant Cell Reports 8: 497–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrag, EI, MS Lesney, and DL Rockwood. 1989b. Plant Cell Reports 8: 500–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrag, EI, MS Lesney, and DL Rockwood. 1990. New Forests 4: 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrag, E, MS Lesney, and DL Rockwood. 1991. Plant Cell Reports 9: 586–589

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. K. Vasil

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rockwood, D.L., Warrag, E.I. Field performance of micropropagated, macropropagated, and seed-derived propagules of three Eucalyptus grandis ortets. Plant Cell Reports 13, 628–631 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232934

Key words

Navigation