Skip to main content
Log in

Ploidy-dependent genomic stability in the tissue cultures of ornamental Phlox drummondii Hook

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparisons of the chromosome numbers, 2C nuclear DNA amounts and karyomorphology were made in explant cultures of diploid (2n = 2x = 14) and autotetraploid (2n = 4x = 28) Phlox drummondii. In 6–36 week old calli derived from diploid internodal segment explants, and in cells of root tips regenerated from such callus, marked differences were observed in chromosome number. The chromosome numbers ranged from 2n = 14 to 2n = 100 and DNA amounts from 8.20 to 63.20 pg in the diploid derived callus, while the extent of variation was much reduced in the regenerated roots. In contrast, the autotetraploid cultures were characterised by the maintenance of the same chromosome number and DNA amounts as the mother plant. Modified chromosome structures were not apparent in any of the cultures. The possible reasons for the chromosomal instability at the diploid level and stability at the tetraploid level are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey LH (1963) The standard cyclopedia of horticultural plants. Macmillan Publishing Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss MW (1980) Int Rev Cytol (Suppl) 11A: 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD, Smith JB (1976) Phil Trans Roy Soc Ser B 274: 227–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennici A (1979) Z Pflanzenzucht 82: 349–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (1987) Cell and tissue culture in forestry, Vol 1. General principles and biotechnology. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 422

    Google Scholar 

  • Consantin MJ (1981) Envir Exp Bot 21: 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Creissen GP, Karp A (1985) Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 4: 171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato F (1985) CRC Crit Rev Pl Sci 3: 73–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA (1989) Trends Genet 5: 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A (1989) Intl Asso Pl Tiss Cult Newslett 58: 2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Nelson RS, Thomas E, Bright SWJ (1982) Theor Appl Genet 63: 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Risiott R, Jones MGK, Bright SWJ (1984) Pl Cell Tiss Org Cult 3: 363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1987) Iowa State J Res 61: 393–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Theor Appl Genet 60: 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Phillips RL (1987) Genome 29: 122–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy M (1976) Biochem Syst Eco 14: 249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears JA (1980) In: Lewis WH (ed) Polyploidy, biological relevance. Plenum Press, New York pp. 77–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 463–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata M, Orton TJ (1984) Can J Genet Cytol 26: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak S, Sen S (1987) In: Reddy GM (ed) Plant cell tissue culture of economically important plants. Osmania University, Hyderabad, India pp 265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RS, Karp A, Bright SWJ (1986) J Exp Bot 37: 253–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton TJ (1984) In: Gustafson JP (ed) Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Plenum Press, New York, pp 427–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RL, Kaepller SM, Pescheke VM (1990) In: Nijkamp HJJ, Vanderplaus LHW, Aartrijk JV (eds) Progress in plant cellular molecular biology. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, pp 131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Piton F (1969) Rev Gen Bot 76: 287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina SN, Rees H (1983) Heredity 51: 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao SR, Raina SN, Srivastav PK (1982) J Cytol Genet 17: 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacristan MD (1971) Chromosoma 33: 273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacristan MD, Wendt-Gallitelli MF (1973) Chromosoma 43: 279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Scowcroft WR (1985) In: Hohn B, Dennis ES (eds) Genetic flux in plants. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Seridan WMF (1975) In: Ledoux L (ed) Genetic manipulations and plant material. Plenum Press, New York, pp 263–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Ramulu K, Dijkhuis P, Roesl S (1983) Theor Appl Genet 65: 329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussex IM (1965) In: White PR, Grove AR (eds) Proc Int Conf Pl Tissue Cult. McCutchan, Berkeley, pp 383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedlund B, Vasil IK (1985) Theor Appl Genet 69: 575–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybenga J (1972) General Cytogenetics. North Holland Publ Co, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal M (1977) Bot Gaz 138: 119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal M, Gardi I (1976) Pl Physiol 38: 257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma RC, Raina SN (1980) The Nucleus 23: 176–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler VA, Evans NE, Foulger D, Webb KG, Karp A, Franklin J, Bright SWJ (1985) Ann Bot 55: 309–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. C. Phillips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raja, V.G., Koul, K.K., Raina, S.N. et al. Ploidy-dependent genomic stability in the tissue cultures of ornamental Phlox drummondii Hook. Plant Cell Reports 12, 12–17 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232414

Keywords

Navigation