Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 438–444 | Cite as

Habituation to repeated painful and non-painful cutaneous stimuli: a quantitative psychophysical study

  • R. J. Milne
  • N. E. Kay
  • R. J. Irwin


Repeated stimuli elicit progressively smaller responses and elevated sensory and/or pain thresholds (habituation). The present experiments were designed to determine the rate of habituation of perceptual responses to supraliminal painful and non-painful cutaneous stimuli. Changes in the perceived intensity of electrical stimuli applied to the digital nerves of the index finger were determined by a matching procedure in which subjects set the current applied to the index finger of one hand to match the perceived intensity of a stimulus train (5 pulses at 20 Hz) applied to the other index finger. Twenty-five volunteers took part in 7 experiments in which both non-painful (2.5 times the sensory threshold Ts) and painful (1.2 times the pain threshold Tp) stimulus trains were presented. Subjects were required to match the stimuli at 30 s intervals over a period of 7.5 min. The percentage change in matching current (Y) was fitted by the function Y= -20.7*[1 -exp (-0.56*t)] for both painful and non-painful stimuli repeated at 2 Hz. Responses recovered completely within 2 min of cessation of the stimulation. The degree of habituation increased or decreased with the rate of stimulus presentation. These results did not depend on changes in afferent fibre recruitment or fatigue because the afferent volley on the median nerve remained constant throughout the period of stimulation. Thus perceptual responses to the perceived intensity of supraliminal painful and non-painful stimuli delivered to the index finger habituate to the same extent, and the extent of the habituation is a function of the frequency of presentation of the stimulus.

Key words

Cutaneous sensation Stimulus matching Habituation Pain Human 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bromm B, Scharein E (1982) Response plasticity of pain evoked reactions in man. Physiol Behav 28:109–116Google Scholar
  2. Chapman CR, Colpitts YH, Mayeno JK, Gagliardi GJ (1981) Rate of stimulus repetition changes evoked potential amplitude: Dental and auditory modalities compared. Exp Brain Res 43:246–252Google Scholar
  3. Condes-Lara M, Calvo JM, Fernandez-Guardiola A (1981) Habituation to bearable experimental pain elicited by tooth pulp electrical stimulation. Pain 11:185–200Google Scholar
  4. Dallenbach KM (1939) Pain: history and present status. Am J Psycho 1 52:331–347Google Scholar
  5. Dennis SG (1976) Adaptation of aversive brain stimulation. Behav Biol 18:531–544Google Scholar
  6. Dimitrijevic MR, Faganel J, Gregoric M, Nathan PW, Trontelj JK (1972) Habituation: effects of regular and stochastic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 35:234–42Google Scholar
  7. Dowman R, Rosenfeld JP (1985) Operant conditioning of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude in rats. I specific changes in SEP amplitude and a naloxone-reversible somatotopically specific change in facial nociception. Brain Res 333:201–12Google Scholar
  8. Duranti GR, Pantaleo T (1983) Relationship between characteristics of electrical stimulation, muscle pain and blink responses in man. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 55:637–44Google Scholar
  9. Ernst M, Lee MHM, Dworkin B, Zaretsky HH (1986) Pain perception decrement produced through repeated stimulation. Pain 26:221–231Google Scholar
  10. Gamble GD, Milne RJ (1989) Repeated exposure to sham testing procedures reduces reflex withdrawal and hotplate latencies: attenuation of tonic descending inhibition? Neurosci Lett 96:312–317Google Scholar
  11. Glaser EM (1966) The physiological basis of habituation. OUP, NY, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray H (1973) Anatomy of the human body. Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobson RC, Chapman CR, Gerlach R (1985) Stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval effects on pain-related cerebral potentials. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 62:352–65Google Scholar
  14. Lisney SJW (1978) Some anatomical and electrophysiological properties of tooth pulp afferents in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 284:19–36Google Scholar
  15. Milne RJ, Gamble GD (1989) Habituation to sham testing procedures modifies tail-flick latencies: effects on nociception rather than vasomotor tone. Pain 39:103–107Google Scholar
  16. Milne RJ, Aniss AM, Kay NE, Gandevia SC (1987) Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement; a quantitative study. Exp Brain Res 70:569–576Google Scholar
  17. Milne RJ, Gamble GD, Holford NHG (1989) Behavioural tolerance to morphine analgesia is supraspinally mediated: a quantitative analysis of dose response relationships. Brain Res 491:316–327Google Scholar
  18. Ohman A, Lader M (1972) Selective attention and habituation of the auditory averaged evoked response in humans. Physiol Behav 8:79–85Google Scholar
  19. Rollman GB, Harris G (1987) The detectability, discriminability, and perceived magnitude of painful electric shock. Percept Psychophys 42:257–268Google Scholar
  20. Sharpless S, Jasper H (1956) Habituation of the arousal reaction. Brain 79:655–80Google Scholar
  21. Sokolov EN (1975) The neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex. In: Sokolov EN, Vinogravoda OS (eds) Neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex, pp 217–235. Erlebaum, Hillsdale NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson RF, Spencer WA (1966) A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behaviour. Psychol Rev 73:16–43Google Scholar
  23. Törebjork HE, Hallin RG (1974) Responses in human A and C fibres to repeated electrical intradermal stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 37:653–64Google Scholar
  24. Willis WD, Coggeshall RE (1978) Sensory mechanisms of the spinal cord. Plenum, NY, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Milne
    • 1
  • N. E. Kay
    • 1
  • R. J. Irwin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of AucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations