Skip to main content
Log in

High affinity DNA-microtubule associated protein interaction

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have isolated the MAP/tau proteins from twice-cycled chick brain microtubule preparations and demonstrated that they are responsible for the nitrocellulose DNA binding activity we and others have measured. Using the isolated MAP/tau proteins we then measured the apparent affinity constant Kapp for the homologous chick DNA interaction and found evidence for two equilibrium affinity classes-a Kapp = 6 × 107 M−1, responsible for the bulk of the DNA binding activity and a small (< 10%) higher affinity Kapp = 108 − 109 M−1, likely due to sequence specific binding protein species. Using the same chick brain MAP-tau protein, a heterologous interaction with D. melanogaster DNA, was found to possess just the lower affinity class-Kapp = 2 × 107 M−1. Under stringent binding conditions we carried out equilibrium nitrocellulose filter binding experiments in a ternary reaction mixture at constant MAP/tau protein and 35S radiolabelled chick DNA concentration using increasing and excess concentrations of competitor DNAs of different sources. The order of competitor strengths found was-chick DNA > mouse DNA > D. melanogaster = E. coli. DNA. These data and specifically the homologous DNA: protein case being the strongest competitor corroborate our previous studies using total microtubule protein and provide new evidence for a conserved interaction of a small DNA sequence class with MAP/tau protein species. Moreover, these data allow us to conclude that the conserved DNA sequence: MAP/tau protein interactions do not critically depend upon any energetic feature co-involving tubulin for their properties since tubulin is absent from these preparations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchison TJ: Mitosis: basic concepts. Curr Opinion Cell Biol 1: 67–74, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandelkow E, Mandelkow E: Microtubular structure and tubulin polymerization. Curr Opinion Cell Biol 1: 5–9, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avila J: Microtubule dynamics. FASEB J 4: 3284–3290, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sluder G: Functional properties of kinetochores in animal cells. Curr Opinion Cell Biol 2: 23–27, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balczon BD, Brinkley BR: Tubulin interaction with kinetochore proteins: Analysis by in vitro assembly and chemical crosslinking. J Cell Biol 105: 855–862, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  6. Earnshaw WC, Cooke CA: Proteins of the inner and outer centromere of mitotic chromosomes. Genome 31: 541–552, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corces VG, Salas J, Salas ML, Avila J: Binding of microtubule proteins to DNA: Specificity of the interaction. Eur J Biochem 86: 473–479, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Villasante A, Corces VG, Manso-Martinez R, Avila J: Binding of microtubule protein to DNA and chromatin: possibility of simultaneous linkage of microtubule to nucleic acid and assembly of the microtubule structure. Nuc Acids Res 9: 895–908, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schroeder HC, Bernd A, Zahn RK, Mueller WEG: Binding of polyribonucleotides and polydeoxyribonucleotides to bovine brain microtubule protein: age dependent modulation via phosphorylation of high molecular weight microtubule-associated proteins and tau proteins. Mech Ageing Dev 24(1): 101–117, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marx KA, Denial T, Keller T: High affinity microtubule proteinhigher organism DNA complexes: Many fold enrichment in repetitive mouse DNA sequences comprised of satellite DNAs. Biochim Biophys Acta 783: 383–392, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marx KA, Denial T: Chromosome segregation, kinetochores and DNA-microtubule interaction: A preferential satellite DNA-MAP interaction may be conserved in evolution. In: Molecular basis of cancer 172B, Alan R. Liss Inc: 65–75, 1985

  12. Avila J, Montejo de Garcini E, Wandosell F, Villasante A, Sogo JM, Villanueva N: Microtubule-associated protein MAP 2 preferentially binds to a dA/dT sequence present in mouse satellite DNA. The EMBO J 2: 1229–1234, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hancock JM, Burns RG: Specificity and biological significance of microtubule-associated protein-DNA interactions in chick. Biochim Biophys Acta 927: 163–168, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shelanski ML, Gaskin F, Cantor CR: Isolation of functional microtubule protein from eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 765–768, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: A colorimetric assay for protein concentration determination. J Biol Chem 193: 265–273, 1951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the T4 head. Nature 227: 680–690, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sloboda RD, Rosenbaum JL: Decoration and stabilization od intact, smooth-walled microtubules with MAPS. Biochemistry 18: 48–58, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones DW, Berg PJ: Nitrocellulose filter binding analysis of DNA-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 22: 199–209, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marx KA, Denial T: A high affinity microtubule protein-DNA interaction in chick: Evidence for a conserved interaction. Submitted for publication

  20. Mello C, Marx KA: The affinity of DNA-microtubule associated protein complexes and their disruption by tubulin binding drugs. J Biomolecular Structure and dynamics 9: 791–805, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  21. Czworkowski J, Odom OW, Hardesty B: Fluorescence study of the topology of messenger RNA bound to the 30S ribosomal subunit of E. coli. Biochemistry 30: 4821–4830, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanas JS, Bogenhagen DF, Wu, Cheng-Wen: Cooperative model for the binding of xenopus transcription factor A to the 5S RNA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 2142–2145, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tan G, Kelly P, Kim J, Wartell RM: Comparison of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and a cAMP-independent from of CRP by raman spectroscopy and DNA binding. Biochemistry 30: 5076–5080, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lesser D, Kurpiewski MR, Jen-Jacobson L: The energetic basis of specificity in the Eco-RI endonuclease-DNA interaction. Science 250: 776–786, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marx KA: Differential condensation of DNA families in mouse chromation: accessibility to nuclease probes. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 78: 777–784, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rattner JB, Crystal G, Hamkalo BA: Electron microscopic visualization of nuclease digested metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 66: 259–268, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hagerman PJ: Sequence directed curvature in DNA. Ann Rev Biochem 59: 755–781, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  28. Racdic MZ, Lundgren K, Hamkalo BA: Curvature of mouse satellite DNA and the condensation of heterochromatin. Cell 50: 1101–1108, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsumoto H, Masukata H, Muro Y, Nozaki N, Okazaki T: A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J Cell Biol 109: 1963–1973, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mithieux G, Roux B, Rousset B: Tubulin-chromatin interactions. Evidence for tubulin binding sites on chromatin and isolated oligonucleosomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 859: 1092–1098, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lechner J, Carbon J: A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64: 717–725, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marx, K.A. High affinity DNA-microtubule associated protein interaction. Mol Cell Biochem 113, 55–61 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230885

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230885

Key words

Navigation