Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrastructural and biochemical comparisons of nuclear matrices prepared by high salt or LIS extraction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have directly compared two independently published methods for isolating operationally defined nuclear matrices by studying EM ultrastructure, protein composition and distribution of replicating DNA. Nuclear matrices prepared by extraction with 2 M NaCI consisted of fibrous pore complex lamina, residual fibrillar and granular components of nucleoli and interchromatin granules, and an extensive anastomosing internal fibrous network. These matrices were enriched in high molecular weight nonhistone proteins but were virtually devoid of histones. Consistent with previously published data, newly-replicated DNA was resistant to this high salt extraction. Nuclear matrices prepared by extraction of nuclei with 25 mM lithium 3,5-diiodosalicylate, LIS, also contained fibrous pore complex lamina, but lacked morphologically distinct residual nucleoli and were markedly depleted in internal structure. The reduced amounts and complexity of proteins associated with the LIS matrix were consistent with the ultrastructural data. Moreover, much less newly-replicated DNA was recovered in LIS matrices. The data show that LIS dissociates nuclear ultrastructure and extracts both protein and DNA in proportion to the concentration used, regardless of whether nuclei or high salt nuclear matrices are used as starting material. While the data suggest that LIS may not necessarily be an optimal reagent for preparing nuclear matrices containing internal structural elements from all tissue sources, it may be useful for selectively solubilizing and analyzing components of the nuclear matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EM:

electron microscopy

HS:

high salt, 2 M NaCl

LIS:

lithium 3,5-diiodosalicylate

DEPC:

diethyl pyrocarbonate

PMSF:

phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

SBTI:

soybean trypsin inhibitor

VRC:

vanadium ribonucleoside complex

PBS:

phosphate buffered saline

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulfate

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

PAGE:

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Type A and Type B structures were isolated as described in Experimental Procedures by methods A and B, respectively

References

  1. Berezney R, Coffey DS: The nuclear protein matrix: Isolation, structure and functions. Adv Enzyme Regulation 14:63–100, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berezney R: Organization and functions of the nuclear matrix. In: LS Hnilica (ed) Chromosomal Nonhistone Proteins: Structural Associations. CRC Press, Inc Boca Raton, Fl 4: 119–180, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith HC, Ochs RL, Fernandez EA, Spector DL: Macromolecular domains containing nuclear protein p107 and UsnRNP protein p28: Further evidence for an in situ nuclear matrix. Molec Cell Biochem 70:151–168, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berezney R, Basler J, Buchholtz LA, Smith HC, Siegel AJ: Nuclear matrix organization and DNA replication. In: GG Maul (ed) The Nuclear Envelope and the Nuclear Matrix. Alan R Liss, Inc New York 1982, pp 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feinberg AP, Coffey DS: The topology of DNA loops: A possible link between the nuclear matrix structure and nucleic acid function. In: GG Maul (ed) The Nuclear Envelope and the Nuclear Matrix. Alan R Liss, Inc New York 1982, pp 293–305

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pienta KJ, Coffey DS: A structural analysis of the role of the nuclear matrix and DNA loops in the organization of the nucleus and chromosome. J Cell Sci Suppl 1:123–135, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ciejek EM, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature 306:607–609, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson SI, Small D, Idzerda R, McKnight GS, Vogelstein B: The association of transcriptionally active genes with the nuclear matrix of the chicken oviduct. Nucleic Acids Res 11:5113–5130, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mirkovitch J, Mirault ME, Laemmli UK: Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: Specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39:223–232, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith HC, Rothblum LI: Enrichment of ribosomal DNA sequences in nuclear matrix bound DNA. J Cell Biol 97: 357a, 1983

  11. Bolla RI, Braaten DC, Shiomi Y, Hebert MB, Schlessinger D: Localization of specific rDNA spacer sequences to the mouse Lcell nucleolar matrix. Molec Cell Biol 5:1287–1294, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Small D, Vogelstcin B: The anatomy of supercoiled loops in the Drosophila 7F locus. Nucleic Acids Res 13:7703–7713, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cockerill PN, Garrard WT: Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell 44:273–282, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gasser SM, Laemmli UK: The organization of chromatin loops: Characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J 5:511–518, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keppel F: Transcribed human ribosomal RNA genes are attached to the nuclear matrix. J Mol Biol 187:15–21, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berrios M, Osheroff N, Fisher PA: In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4142–4146, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  17. Earnshaw WC, Halligan B, Cooke CA, Heck MMS, Liu LF: Topoisomerase 11 is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol 100:1706–1715, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  18. Earnshaw WC, Heck MMS: Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol 100:1716–1725, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dijkwel PA, Mullenders LH, Wanka F: Analysis of the attachment of replicating DNA to a nuclear matrix in mammalian interphase nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 6:219–230, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pardoll DM, Vogelstein B, Coffey DS: A fixed site of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Cell 19:527–536, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berezney R, Buchholtz LA: Dynamic association of replicating DNA fragments with the nuclear matrix of regenerating liver. Exp Cell Res 132:1–13, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunt BF, Vogelstein B: Association of newly replicated DNA with the nuclear matrix of Physarum polycephalum. Nucleic Acids Res 9:349–363, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith HC, Berezney R: DNA polymerase alpha is tightly bound to the nuclear matrix of actively replicating liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 97:1541–1547, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith HC, Berezney R: Nuclear matrix-bound deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis: An in vitro system. Biochemistry 21:6751–6761, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith HC, Berezny R: Dynamic domains of DNA polymerase alpha in regenerating rat liver. Biochemistry 22:3042–3046, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith HC, Puvion E, Buchholtz LA, Berezney R: Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix. J Cell Biol 99:1794–1802, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tubo RA, Smith HC, Berezney R: The nuclear matrix continues DNA synthesis at in vivo replicational forks. Biochem Biophys Acta 825:326–334, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fey EG, Krochmalnic G, Penman S: The nonchromatin substructures of the nucleus: The ribonucleoprotein (RNP)containing and RNP-depleted matrices analyzed by sequential fractionation and resinless section electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 102:1654–1665, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith HC, Spector DL, Woodcock CLF, Ochs RL, Bhorjee J: Alterations in chromatin conformation are accompanied by reorganization of nonchromatin domains that contain U-snRNP protein p28 and nuclear protein p107. J Cell Biol 101:560–567, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nussbaum RL, Airhart SD, Ledbetter DH: Expression of the fragile (X) chromosome in an interspecies somatic cell hybrid. Hum Genet 64:148–150, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith HC, Berezney R, Brewster JM, Rekosh D: Properties of adenoviral DNA bound to the nuclear matrix. Biochemistry 24:1197–1202, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurements with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275, 1951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufmann SH, Coffey DS, Shaper JH: Considerations in the isolation of rat liver nuclear matrix, nuclear envelope and pore complex lamina. Exp Cell Res 132:105–123, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  34. Berezney R: Effect of protease inhibitors on matrix proteins and the association of replicating DNA. Exp Cell Res 123:411–414, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hutchison N, Weintraub H: Localization of DNase I-sensitive sequences to specific regions of interphase nuclei. Cell 43:471–482, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barrack ER, Coffey DS: The specific binding of estrogens and androgens to the nuclear matrix of sex hormone responsive tissues. J Biol Chem 255:7265–7275, 1980

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, H.C., Ochs, R.L., Lin, D. et al. Ultrastructural and biochemical comparisons of nuclear matrices prepared by high salt or LIS extraction. Mol Cell Biochem 77, 49–61 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230150

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230150

Key words

Navigation