Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting feeding selectivity of visual predators on the copepod Acartia tonsa: locomotion, visibility and escape responses

  • Environmental relationships
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visual predation by fish on copepods involves prey encounter, attack and capture; during any of these processes prey selection can occur. Developmental changes in copepods, including increases in swimming speed, size and image contrast increase the encounter rate and distance at which they can be detected by predators. Copepods compensate for this increase vulnerability with age through diel vertical migration and improved escape capabilities. This study quantifies the changes in swimming speed and movement pattern with developmental stage of the copepod Acartia tonsa, using a video-computer system for motion analysis. Changes in visible size and image contrast with developmental stage were quantified under simulated natural illumination conditions using a video based image analysis system. The escape responses of the naupliar stages of the copepod Acartia tonsa were quantified in response to a stationary pipette sucking in water at a constant speed. Accurate quantification of the parameters that affect feeding selectivity of planktivorous fish will provide the basis for evaluation of their relative importance in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brooks, J.L. & S.I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskey, E.J., C. Coulter & S. Strom, 1993. Locomotory pattern of microzooplankton: potential effects on food selectivity of larval fish. Bull. mar. Sci. 53: 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkley, D.M. 1982. Selective feeding by Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) larvae on zooplankton in natural assemblages. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 9: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J.L., G.L. Howick, M.H. Corzette, S.L. Kramer, S. Fitzgibbon & R. Landesberg, 1978. Visual predation by planktivores. Oikos 31: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R.W. & S.R. McComas, 1980. The roles of zooplankton escape ability and fish size selectivity in the selective feeding and impact of planktivorous fish. In W.C. Kerfoot (ed.), Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R.W., J.R. Strickler & W.J. O'Brien, 1978. Capture probability: the role of zooplankton escape in the feeding of planktivorous fish. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 35: 1370–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, D.M., 1977. The nature of prey selection by planktivorous fish. Ecology 58: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, J., 1978. Instar-specific swimming patterns and predation of planktonic copepods. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 2531–2536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, J. & J.R. Strickler, 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govoni, J.J., P.B. Ortner, R. Al-Yamani & L.C. Hill, 1986. Selective feeding of spot, Leiostomus xanthurus, and Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus, larvae in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 28: 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greze, V.N., 1963. The determination of transparency among planktonic organisms and its protective significance. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR Biological Science Section (English Translation) 15: 956–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.J., S.T. Threlkeld, C.W. Burns & P.H. Crowley, 1976. The size efficiency hypothesis and the structure of zooplankton communities. Ann. Rev. ecol. Syst. 7: 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, L.R., D.E. Kenyon & J.R. Brooks, 1980. Experimental evaluation of the avoidance reaction of Calanus finmarchicus. J. Plankton Res. 2: 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw, J.M., 1985. Effects of illumination and prey contrast on survival and growth of larval yellow perch Perca flavescens. Trans. am. fish. Soc. 114: 540–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of European pine sawfly. Can. Ent. 91: 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.R., 1981. Feeding ecology and predation of marine fish larvae, In R. Lasker (ed.), Marine fish larvae: morphology, ecology and relation to fisheries. Wash. Sea Grant Prog., Univ. Wash. Press, Seattle: 33–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W.C., 1980. Commentary: transparency, body size, and prey conspicuousness. In W.C. Kerfoot (ed.), Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire: 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W.C., 1982. A question of taste: crypsis and warning coloration in freshwater zooplankton communities. Ecology 63: 538–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J., N.A. Slade & G.L. Vinyard, 1976. Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochinus). Ecology 57: 1304–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, J.C., 1990. The colour sensitivity and vision of fishes. In P.J. Herring, A.K. Campbell, M. Whitfield & L. Maddock (eds), Light and life in the sea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singarajah, K.V., 1969. Escape reactions of zooplankton: the avoidance of a pursuing siphon tube. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 3: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, H.-B. & W. Lampert, 1981. Predator evasion as an explanation of diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Nature 293: 396–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G.L. & W.J. O'Brien, 1976. Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 2845–2849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, D.M., 1973. Risk of epibenthic prey to predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30: 787–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D.I. & W.J. O'Brien, 1982. Differential location of Chaoborus larvae and Daphnia by fish: the importance of motion and visible size. Amer. Midl. Nat. 108:68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T.M., 1972. Predators, invisible prey, and the nature of polymorphism in the Cladocera (Class Crustacea). Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T.M. & W.C. Kerfoot, 1975. Fish predation on Bosmina longirostris: body size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology 56: 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T. & J.S. Suffern 1976. Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 804–813.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buskey, E.J. Factors affecting feeding selectivity of visual predators on the copepod Acartia tonsa: locomotion, visibility and escape responses. Hydrobiologia 292, 447–453 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229971

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229971

Key words

Navigation