Summary
A size-weight illusion was used to examine the role of visual cues in the programming of manipulative forces during the lifting of test objects utilizing the preci sion grip. Three different boxes of equal weight and unequal size were lifted. These were equipped with an instrumented grip handle to measure the employed grip force, load force (vertical lifting force), force rates and vertical movement. All fifteen subjects participating in the study reported that the smallest box was the heaviest which is consistent with size-weight illusion predictions. However, the rate of increase of the isometric grip and load forces initially during the lift, the peaks of the grip and load force and the vertical acceleration were all found to increase with the box size. Thus, despite the conscious perception indicating a heavier weight for the small object, the motor program was scaled for a lighter weight. Yet, no differences were found in grip force during the static phase of the lift, where weight related information was apparently available via sensory feed back. Previous studies have reported that the program ming of the precision grip is based on somatosensory information gained during previous lifts (Johansson and Westling 1984, 1988a, b). The present study suggests that visual cues are integrated in the programming of manipu lative forces during precision grip.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bizzi E, Abend W (1983) Posture control of trajectory formation in single and multi-joint arm movements. In: Desmedt RE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven Press, New York, pp 31–45
Brooks VB (1984) How are “move” and “hold” programs matched. In: Bloedel et al. (eds) Cerebellar functions. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–23
Charpentier A (1891) Analyse experimentale de quelgues elements de la sensation de poids. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol 3:122–135
Claparede E (1901) Experiences sur la vitesse du soulevement des poids de volumes differents. Arch Psychol Suisse Romande 1:69–94
Davis DM, Roberts W (1976) Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion. Percept 20:33–36
Gachoud JP, Mounoud P, Hauert CA (1983) Motor strategies in lifting movements: a comparison of adult and child performance. J Motor Behav 15, 3:202–216
Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977) Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol 272:673–689
Ghez C (1979) Contributions of central programs to rapid limb movements in the cat. In: Asanuma H, Wilson V (eds) Integration in the nervous system. Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, pp 305–319
Gibson JJ (1933) Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J Exp Psychol 16:1–31
Gordon J, Ghez C (1984) EMG Patterns in antagonist muscles during contration in man. Exp Brain Res 55:167–171
Harshfield SP, DeHardt DC (1970) Weight judgement as a function of apparent density of objects. Psychonom Sci 20:365–366
Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension: a cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:305–319
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988a) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precisian grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988b) Programmed and reflex actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 1:72–86
Johansson RS, Westling G (1990) Tactile afferent signals in the control of precision grip. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance Vol XIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 677–713
Johansson RS (1990) How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Dahlem Konferenzen. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp 331–355
Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387–403
Kinney JA, Luria SM (1970) Conflicting visual and tactual-kinesthetic stimulation. Percept Psychophys 8:189–192
Klein RM, Posner MI (1974) Attention to visual and kinesthetic components of skill. Brain Res 71:401–411
Martin L, Muller GE (1899) Zur Analyse der Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit. Barth, Leipzig
Pick HL, Warren DH, Hay JU (1969) Sensory conflict in judgement of spatial direction. Percept Psychophys 6:203–205
Rock I, Harris CS (1967) Vision and touch. Sci Am 216:96–107
Schmidt RA (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Review 82:225–260
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gordon, A.M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R.S. et al. Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 83, 477–482 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229824
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229824


