Skip to main content
Log in

Variants of polar ordination

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three data matrix standardizations, three distance measures, and four ordination equations were tested in a factorial design of 36 variants of polar ordination, including the one originally given by Bray & Curtis (1957), with reciprocal averaging (Hill 1973) serving as a standard of comparison. Their effectiveness was tested on simulated data sets varying in beta diversity and noise, and on two sets of field data.

Of the 36 variants of polar ordinations tested here, the original algorithm of Bray & Curtis was on the whole as good as any. The one modification which improved the Bray & Curtis algorithm for a reasonably large range of data set properties was application of the arcsin transformation to percentage difference values (Loucks 1962). In cases where the beta diversity and noise level of the data set are known, performance of variants can be predicted, and in some cases other variants may offer modest improvement over the Bray-Curtis method. For simulated data with exactly known properties differences in performance are mostly small; for field data several variants may give results essentially equivalent to one another and reciprocal averaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A.J.B. 1971. Ordination methods in ecology. J. Ecol. 59: 713–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. 1976. On non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. & L.Orlóci. 1966. Geometric models in ecology. II. An evaluation of some ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 54: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E.W. 1960. Forest bird communities in the Apostle Islands of Wisconsin. Wilson Bull. 72: 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J.R. & J.T.Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, G., F.G.Goff & R.H.Whittaker. 1978. Wisconsin comparitive ordination. In: R.H.Whittaker (ed.) Ordination of plant communities, p. 185–213. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.B. 1975. On objectives of methods of ordination. Vegetatio 30: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. 1973a. A quantitative evaluation of the Bray-Curtis ordination. Ecology 54: 829–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. 1973b. The relationship between sample similarity and ecological distance. Ecology 54: 618–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. 1977. ORDIFLEX: a flexible computer program for four ordination techniques: weighted averages, polar ordination, principal components analysis, and reciprocal averaging, Release B. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853. 185 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., G.B.Chase & R.H.Whittaker. 1974. Ordination of vegetation samples by Gaussian species distributions. Ecology 55: 1382–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. & R.H.Whittaker. 1972. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 53: 446–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. & E.L. Stone. 1979. The vegetation and soil of a mesophytic forest at Ithaca, N.Y. Am. Midl. Nat. (in press).

  • Gauch, H.G., R.H.Whittaker & T.R.Wentworth. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser. C, 23: 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessell, S.R. & R.H.Whittaker. 1976. Comparisons of three ordination techniques. Vegetatio 32: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, O.L. 1962. Ordinating forest communities by means of environmental scalars and phytosociological indices. Ecol. Monogr. 32: 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E.van der. 1969. On the use of ordination models in phytosociology. Vegetatio 19: 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R.H.Whittaker. 1977. Continuous multivariate methods in community analysis: some problems and developments. Vegetatio 33: 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R.H.Whittaker. 1978. Recent developments in continuous multivariate techniques. p. 337–378, in: R.H.Whittaker (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1974. Revisions for the Bray and Curtis ordination. Can. J: Bot. 52: 1773–1776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research, 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague, 451 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1952. A study of summer follage insects in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 22: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. & H.G.Gauch. 1978. Evaluation of ordination techniques. p. 277–336. in: R.H.Whittaker (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank M.O. Hill, R.H. Whittaker and Z. Szöcs for useful discussions and suggestions, and P. Feinsinger and D. May for comments on the manuscript. C.E. French, Jr., T.F. Mason and S.B. Singer provided technical assistance. This work was done under a National Science Foundation grant to R.H. Whittaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauch, H.G., Scruggs, W.M. Variants of polar ordination. Vegetatio 40, 147–153 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228478

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228478

Keywords

Navigation