Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the KTP 532 laser in aesthetic facial surgery

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of the KTP 532 laser to reduce postoperative swelling and bruising in aesthetic facial surgery. Thirty consecutive patients receiving a laser-assist procedure (following skin incision with a scalpel, dissection and hemostasis were accomplished primarily with the laser) were compared to 16 patients who had similar technical operations but relied on scissor/scalpel dissection and electrocautery for hemostasis. Evaluations were performed by comparison of serial photographs after surgery and by patient self-assessment. The clinical observations demonstrated a noticeable reduction in postoperative swelling, bruising, and discomfort in the patients whose procedure was performed with the aid of the laser.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apfelberg DB: YAG laser meloplasty and blepharoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 19:231, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker SS, Muenzler WS, Small RG, et al: Carbon dioxide laser blepharoplasty. Ophthalmology 91:238, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David LM: The laser approach to blepharoplasty. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 14(7):741, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David LM, Sanders G: CO2 laser blepharoplasty: a comparison to cold steel and electrocautery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13(2):110, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keller GS: KTP laser cosmetic surgery. Am J Cosm Surg 9:177, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keller GS: Transblepharoplasty brow suspension with KTP laser. Int J Aesthetic Restor Surg 1:1, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keller GS, Razum NJ, Elliot S, et al: Small incision laser lift for forehead creases and glabellar furrows. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:632, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mittleman H, Apfelberg DB: Carbon dioxide laser blepharoplasty—advantages and disadvantages. Ann Plast Surg 214:1, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morrow DM, Morrow L: CO2 laser blepharoplasty. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:307, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trelles MA, Sanchez J, Sala P, et al: Surgical laser blepharoplasty. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. University Nova de Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulick, M.I. Evaluation of the KTP 532 laser in aesthetic facial surgery. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 20, 53–57 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228474

Key words

Navigation