Abstract
Our surgical understanding and preference for an implant design suggests that location of the implant in the retromuscular plane gives an aesthetically better looking clinical result, there is less rippling when the chest wall is vertical, and the implant flattens when the patient is lying supine. An implant with a textured posterior wall and smooth anterior wall assists adherence of the implant at the desired level. It also induces a pseudo-bursa over its anterior surface which, being larger than the implant surface, allows it to flatten naturally when the patient is lying or raising the arm. A gel-filled implant gives the most natural quality to an implant and the contents displace less readily and therefore do not tend to cause rippling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker JL, Chandler ML, Le Vier RR: Occurrence and activity of myofibroplasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:905–14, 1981.
Burkhardt BR, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ, Dempsey PD: Objective clinical assessment of fibrous capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:794–801, 1982.
Burkhardt BR: Capsular contracture: hard breasts, soft data. Clin Plast Surg 15:521–32, 1988.
Coleman DJ: Contractile fibroplast structure and function in the tissue response to injury. M.S. Thesis 1991. University of Southampton.
Batra, M, Bernard S, Picha G: Histological comparison of breast implant shells with smooth, foam and pillar microstructuring. Plast Reconstr Surg 95: 2354–363.
Coleman DJ, Foo ITH, Sharpe DT: Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation. Br J Plast Surg 44:444–448, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicolle, F.V. Capsular contracture and ripple deformity of breast implants. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 20, 311–314 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228461
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228461