Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlational models of content: reply to Muskens

  • Notes
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communications Research. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, M. (1977). Linguistic data structure, reducing encoding by hand and programming language, in A. Jones and R.F. Churchhouse (eds.) The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Studies. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, M. (1978) Ambiguity and Automated Content Analysis. Methoden en Data Nieuwsbrief 3: 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, C., D. McTavish, and E. Pirro (1974) Quester-Contextual Content Analysis Methodology. Paper presented 1974 Pisa Conference on Content Analysis.

  • Holsti, O.R. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iker, H.P. (1974). An Historical Note on the Use of Word-Frequency Contiguities in Content Analysis. Computers and the Humanities 8: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iker, H.P. and N.I. Harway (1969) A computer systems approach toward the recognition and analysis of content, in G. Gerbner, et al. (eds.) The Analysis of Communication Content. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E.F. and P.J. Stone (1975) Computer Recognition of English Word Senses. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTavish, D.G. and E.B. Pirro (1984) Contextual Content Analysis. Paper presented at the Pacific Sociological Association Meetings, Seattle, April 12, 1984.

  • Muskens, G. (1985) Mathematical Analysis of Content: Weber's ‘Measurement Models in Content Analysis’. Quality and Quantity. 19: 99–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J.Z., and R. Bibbee (1975) Speech Codes in the Press. Journal of Communication. 25: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris-Gallhofer, I.N., W.E. Saris, and E.L. Morton (1978) A Validation Study of Holsti's Content Analysis Procedure. Quality and Quantity. 12: 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P.J., D.C. Dunphy, M.S. Smith, and D.M. Ogilvie (1966) the General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1983) Measurement Models for Content Analysis. Quality and Quantity. 17: 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1984). Content Analysis: A Short Primer. Qualitative Sociology. 7 (1/2): 126–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1985) Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office for Information technology, Harvard University, 1730 Cambridge Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Robert Philip Weber

Authors
  1. Robert Philip Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, R.P. Correlational models of content: reply to Muskens. Qual Quant 20, 273–275 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227431

Keywords

Search

Navigation