Skip to main content
Log in

On evaluating the equivalency of alternative MDS representations

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A typical question in MDS is whether two alternative configurations that are both acceptable in terms of data fit may be considered “practically the same”. To answer such questions on the equivalency of MDS solutions. Lingoes & Borg (1983) have recently proposed a quasistatistical decision strategy that allows one to take various features of the situation into account. This paper adds another important piece of information to this approach: for the Lingoes-Borg decision criterion R, we compute what proportion of R-values is greater/less than the observed coefficient if one were to consider all possible alternative distance sets within certain bounds defined by the observed fit coefficients for two alternative MDS solutions, what are the limits of acceptability for such fit coefficients, and how are the observed MDS configurations interrelated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borg, I. Anwendungsorientierte Multidimensionale Skalierung. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I. & Lingoes, J.C. Multidimensional scaling with external constraints on the distances. In J.C. Lingoes, E.E. Roskam, & I. Borg (eds.) Geometric Representations of Relational Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press, 1979, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I. & Lingoes, J.C. A model and algorithm for multidimensional scaling with external constraints on the distances. Psychometrika, 1980, 45, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I. & Lingoes, J.C. An alternative approach to confirmatory inference and geometric models. Quality and Quantity, 1981, 15, 541–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision. Journal of Psychology, 1954, 38, 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M., van de Geer, J.P., & Plomp, R. Triadic comparisons of tonal intervals. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. Testing regional hypotheses in multidimensional scaling. In I. Borg (ed.) Multidimensional Data Representations: When and Why. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. & Borg, I. A quasi-statistical model for choosing between alternative configurations derived from ordinally constrained data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1983a, 36, 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. & Borg, I. A mathematical decision model for the Lingoes-Borg criteria in testing the equivalence hypothesis. University of Michigan Computing Technical Report, 1983b, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V. Multidimensional scaling of N sets of similarity measures: A nonmetric individual differences approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1968, 3, 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. Analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function — II. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. Representations of structure in similarity data: Problems and Prospects. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 373–421.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lingoes, J.C., Borg, I. On evaluating the equivalency of alternative MDS representations. Qual Quant 20, 249–256 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227428

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227428

Key words

Navigation