Summary
We compare 22 simple tests for the detection of major gene segregation in livestock populations. These tests belong to two groups: methods based on the comparison of within-family distribution and methods based on the comparison of parents' and offspring performances. The power of the 22 tests and the robustness of the two more powerful of these 22 are evaluated by simulation. Thirteen types of major loci, differing in the within-genotype means, variances or alleles frequencies, are studied. Thirty hierarchically balanced populations defined by the number of sire families (5–20), dams per sire (1–20) and progenies per dam (1–20) are simulated. The quantiles are estimated from 2000 samples, the power from 1000 samples and the robustness from 100 samples. The more powerful tests are the within family-variance heterogenity test (Bartlett test) and the within-family mean-variance regression (Fain 1978). Their robustness may be very low, in particular when the trait distribution is skewed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett MS (1937) Som examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. J R Soc [Suppl] 4:137–170
Bodin L, Elsen JM (1989) Viability of litter size of French sheep breeds following natural or induced ovulation. Anim Prod 48:534–541
Carmelli D, Karlin S, Williams R (1979) A class of indices to assess major gene versus polygenic inheritance of distributed variables. In: Sing CF, Skolnick M (eds) The genetic analysis of common diseases: applications to predictive factors in coronary heart disease. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 259–270
Demenais F, Lathrop M, Lalouel JM (1986) Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements. Am J Hum Genet 38:228–234
El Amraoui A, Goffinet B (1991) Estimation of the density of G given observations of Y = G + E. Biom J 33:3:347–355
Fain PR (1978) Characteristics of simple sibship variance tests for the detection of major loci and application to height, weight and spatial performance. Ann Hum Genet 42:109–120
Fain PR, Ott J (1976) Heterogeneity of within sibship variance as a test of the major gene hypothesis. In: Vth Int CongrHum Genet Excerpta Med Int Congr Ser 397:180 (Summary)
Famula TR (1986) Identifying single genes of large effect in quantitative traits using best linear unbiased prediction. J Anim Sci 63:68–76
Hammond K, James JW (1970) Genes of large effect and the shape of the distribution of a quantitative character. Aust J Biol Sci 23:867–876
Hanset R, Michaux C (1985a) On the genetic determinism of muscular hypertrophy in the Belgian White and Blue cattle breed. I. Experimental data. Génét Sél Evol 17:359–368
Hanset R, Michaux C (1985b) On the genetic determinism of muscular hypertrophy in the Belgian White and Blue cattle breed. II. Population data. Génét Sél Evol 17:369–386
Harrel FE, Davis CE (1982) A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika 69–635–640
Hoeschele I (1988) Statistical techniques for detection of major genes in animal breeding data. Theor Appl Genet 76:311–319
Kammerer CM, MacCluer JW, Bridges JM (1984) An evaluation of three statistics of Structured Exploratory Data Analysis. Am J Hum Genet 36:187–196
Karlin S, Williams PT (1981) Structured Exploratory Data Analysis (SEDA) for determining mode of inheritance of quantitative traits. II. Simulation studies on the effect of ascertaining families through high-valued probands. Am J Hum Genet 33:282–292
Karlin S, Carmelli D, Williams R (1979) Index measures for assessing the mode of inheritance of continuously distributed traits. I. Theory and justifications. Theor Popul Biol 16:81–106
Karlin S, Williams PT, Carmelli (1981) Structured Exploratory Data Analysis (SEDA) for determining mode of inheritance of quantitative traits. I. Simulation studies on the effect of background distributions. Am J Hum Genet 33:262–281
Le Roy P, Naveau J, Elsen JM, Sellier P (1990) Evidence for a new major gene influencing meat quality in pigs. Genet Res 55:33–40
MacCluer JW, Kammerer CM (1984) Power of sibship variance tests to detect major genes. In: Chakravarti A (ed) Human population genetics: the Pittsburgh symposium. Van Nostrand, New York, pp 125–141
MacLean CJ, Morton NE, Elston RC, Yee S (1976) Skewness in comingled distributions. Biometrics 32:695–699
Mayo O (1989) Identification of genes which influence quantitative traits. In: Hill WG, Mackay TFC (eds) Evolution and animal breeding. Reviews on molecular and quantitative approaches in honour of Alan Robertson. Wallingford, CAB Int, pp 141–146
Mayo O, Hancock TW, Baghurst PA (1980) Influence of major genes on variance within sibships for a quantitative trait. Ann Hum Genet 43:419–421
Mayo O, Eckert SR, Nugroho WH (1982) Models of gene effects for a quantitative trait in man. In: Malhotra KC, Amitabha Basu (eds) Proc Indian Stat Inst Golden Jubilee Conf. Hum Genet and Adapt, Vol 1. pp 479–489
Mayo O, Eckert SR, Nugroho WH (1983) Properties of the Major Gene Index and related functions. Hum Hered 33:205–212
Mérat P (1968) Distributions de fréquences, interprétration du déterminisme génétique des caracteres quantitatifs et recherche de “gènes majeurs”. Biometrics 24:277–293
Mérat P (1971) Distributions de fréquences, interprétation du déterminisme génétique des caracteres quantitatifs et recherche de “gènes majeurs”: données expérimentales. Ann Génét Sél Anim 3:281–293
Mérat P, Ricard FH (1974) Etude d'un gène de nanisme lié au sexe chez la poule: importance de l'état d'engraissement et gain de poids chez l'adulte. Ann Génét Sél Anim 6:211–217
Morton NE, Williams WR, Lew R (1982) Trials of structured exploratory data analysis. Am J Hum Genet 34:489–500
Morton NE, Gulbrandsen CL, Rhoads GG, Kagan A, Lew R (1978) Major loci for lipoprotein concentrations. Am J Hum Genet 30:583–589
Ollivier L (1968) Etude du déterminisme héréditaire de l'hypertrophie musculaire du porc de Piétrain. Ann Zootech 17:393–407
Ollivier L (1980) Le déterminisme génétique de l'hypertrophie musculaire chez le porc. Ann Génét Sél Anim 12:383–394
Piper LR, Bindon BM (1982) The Booroola Merino and the performance of medium non-peppin crosses at Armidale. In: Piper LR, Bindon BM, Nethery RD (eds) The Booroola Merino. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 9–20
Piper LR, Shrimpton AE (1989) The quantitative effects of genes which influence metrics traits. In: Hill WG, Mackay TFC (eds) Evolution and animal breeding. Reviews on molecular and quantitative approaches in honour of Alan Robertson. Wallingford, CAB Int, pp 147–151
Ricordeau G, Bouillon J, Le Roy P, Elsen JM (1990) Déterminisme génétique du débit de lait au cours de la traite de chèvres. INRA Prod Anim 3:2:121–126
Spielman RS, Harris H, Mellman WJ, Gershowitz H (1978) Dissection of a continuous distribution: red cell galactokinase activity in blacks. Am J Hum Genet 30:237–248
Titterington DM, Smith AFM, Makov UE (1985) Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Woolaston RR, Gray GD, Albers GAA, Piper LR, Barker JSF (1990) Analysis for a major gene affecting parasite resistance in sheep. In: Proc 4th World Cong Genet Appl to Livestock Prod, Vol 15. Edinburgh, pp 131–134
Young RS, Reed T, Norton JA, Christian JC (1981) Application of the Major Gene Index and Offspring Between Parents function to dermatoglyphic fingertip variables. Am J Hum Genet 33:432–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by E. J. Eisen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le Roy, P., Elsen, J.M. Simple test statistics for major gene detection: a numerical comparison. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 83, 635–644 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226909
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226909