Summary
Limits on physiological processes, though perhaps unknown, must exist. The reported simulations evaluate the effect of a physiological limit on the estimation of genetic parameters and genetic progress. Simulation experiments reveal no change in the estimate of heritability, even for limits as restrictive as 1.5 phenotypic standard deviations above the population mean. However, estimates of additive genetic and environmental variance shrink as limits on performance increase in severity. Simulated physiological limits do not affect the rate of genetic progress. However, absolute measures of estimated genetic change are less than those predicted by response equations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin RL, Smith NE (1983) Adaptation of metabolism to various conditions: milk production. In: Riis PM (ed) Dynamic biochemsitry of animal production. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 359–388
Beyer WH (ed) (1966) Handbook of tables for probability and statistics. The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, p 115
Cunningham EP (1989) Thoroughbred breeding. Nature 337:414–415
Fregin GF, Thomas DP (1982) Cardiovascular response to exercise in the horse: a review. In: Snow DH, Persson SGB, Rose RJ (eds) Equine exercise physiology. Burlington Press, Cambridge, pp 76–90
Gaffney B, Cunningham EP (1988) Estimation of genetic trend in racing performance of thoroughbred horses. Nature 332:722–724
Gianola D, Fernando RL, Im S, Foulley JL (1989) Likelihood estimation of quantitative genetic parameters when selection occurs: models and problems. Genome 31:768–777
Henderson CR (1984) ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML algorithms for estimation of variances and covariances. In: David HA, David HT (eds) Statistics: an appraisal. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 257–280
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by E. J. Eisen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Famula, T.R., Van Vleck, L.D. Estimation of heritability and genetic trend in populations at a physiological limit. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 699–704 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226886
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226886