Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp

6. Growth of fish in cages

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Relative growth rates of six genetic groups of common carp were compared in small netting cages and in earthen ponds. These groups of carp included an isolate of the Chinese ‘Big Belly Carp’, its crossbred with a European isolate, and four European progenies, purebreds or crossbreds. Five different environments were produced in the ponds, mainly by varying the stocking rates of carp. Each of the (ten) cages was treated as a different environment. Each cage and each pond were stocked with random samples of each genotype, i.e., ‘communal testing’ was carried out. The performance of a given genotype in a given environment was estimated from its weight gain in that environment. The mean weight gain of all groups, stocked into a given environment, was taken as an estimate of that environment as it influenced the growth of carp. The characteristics of the regression of growth of a given genotype on the environment in which it grew [i.e., the coefficient of regression (b) and the Y intercept (a)] are taken as measures of its adaptation to that environment. No real differences in adaptation to pond versus cage conditions were isolated for four of the tested groups, the Chinese x European crossbred, the two European crossbreds and one of the European purebreds. The Chinese carp showed a specific adaptation to growth in ponds (or a lack of adaptation to growth in cages), whereas Dor-70 was specifically adapted to cage conditions. These results may be explained by the genetic history of the two lines. The Big Belly Carp was domesticated under conditions of Chinese subsistence aquaculture, which apparently generated an adaptation to gathering and utilizing natural foods. These are prominently absent in cages. Dor-70 was produced in a long-term selection experiment, which apparently generated a response for growth in cages. These results may be of applicative value, if common carp were to be considered as candidates for commercial cage aquaculture. It would then be important to use strains like Dor-70, which are adapted to these conditions, and avoid strains like the Chinese Big Belly carp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beveridge M (1987) Cage aquaculture. Fishing New Books, Farnham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Coche AG (1982) Cage culture of tilapias. In: Pullin RSV, LoweMcConnel RH (eds) The biology and culture of tilapias ICLARM Conf Proc Manila, The Philippines 7:205–246

  • Gjedrem T (1979) Selection for growth rate and domestication in Atlantic salmon. Z Tierz Zuechtungsbiol 96:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Milstein A, Feldlite M, Mozes N, Avnimelech Y (1989) Limnology of reservoirs used for fish farming and crop irrigation, with integrated free and cage fish culture. Isr J Aquacult Bamidgeh 41:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav R, Wohlfarth G (1976) Two way selection for growth rate in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genetics 82:83–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav R, Wohlfarth G, Lahman M (1964) Genetic improvement of carp. VI. Growth rate of carp imported from Holland, relative to Israeli carp, and some crossbred progeny. Bamidgeh 16:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav R, Wohlfarth G, Hulata G (1975) Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp. I. Analysis of genotype-environment interactions for growth rate. Heredity 34:323–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth GW (1984) Common carp. In: Mason IL (ed) Evolution of domesticated animals. Longman, London, pp 375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth GW, Moav R (1985) Communal testing, a method of testing the growth of different genetic groups of common carp in earthen ponds. Aquaculture 48:143–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth GW, Moav R, Hulata G (1983) A genotype-environment interaction for growth rate in the common carp, growing in intensively manured ponds. Aquaculture 33:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth GW, Moav R, Hulata G (1986) Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of common carp. 5. Differential adaptation to manure and artificial feeds. Theor Appl Genet 72:88–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. F. Linskens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wohlfarth, G.W., Moav, R. Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 693–698 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226885

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226885

Key words

Navigation