Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 37, Issue 1–2, pp 177–191 | Cite as

Aluminum retention in a man-made Sphagnum wetland

  • R. Kelman Wieder
  • Katherine P. Heston
  • Ellen M. O'Hara
  • Gerald E. Lang
  • Alfred E. Whitehouse
  • Jack Hett
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Runoff from a highway interchange in western Maryland had Al concentrations averaging about 50 mg L−1, with a maximum of 206 mg L−1. As an alternative to expensive chemical treatment of this Al-rich water, in August 1984, the drainage was diverted through a 500 m2 man-made wetland, constructed from organic peat. For a 10 week period, Al concentrations in water leaving the wetland averaged 1.5 mg L−1. as compared to Al concentrations at the two major inflows to the wetland of 35.3 and 6.6 mg L−1. However, effective treatment of the drainage by the wetland was not observed over the entire 27 mo sampling period. Peat chemical analysis indicated that over the 27 mo, total Al concentration in the peat increased from 2375 μg g−1 to 13 634 μg g−1. Of this increase 5.5 % was contributed by exchangeable Al, 4.3% by adsorbed Al, 39.8% by organically bound Al, 33.1% by oxide bound Al, and 17.2% by precipitated and residual Al. Changes in Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg, K, and Na chemistry in the peat associated with Al retention are discussed.

Keywords

Oxide Aluminum Chemical Analysis Effective Treatment Sampling Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Association: 1981, Standard Methods for the Analysis of Water and Wastewater, 15th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Burris, J. E., Gerber, D. W., and McHerron, L. E.: 1984, ‘Removal of Iron and Manganese from Water by Sphagnum Moss’, in J. E. Burris (ed.), Treatment of Mine Drainage by Wetlands, Contribution No. 264, Department of Biology. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
  3. Clymo, R. S.: 1963, Ann. Bot., N. S. 27, 309.Google Scholar
  4. Conover, W. J.: 1980, Practical Nonparametric Statistics, second ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Gerber, D. W., Burris, J. E., and Stone, R. W.: 1985, ‘Removal of Dissolved Iron and Manganese Ions by a Sphagnum Moss System’, in R. P. Brooks, D. E. Samuel, and J. B. Hill (eds.), Wetlands and Water Management on Mined Lands, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
  6. Ghiorse, W. C.: 1984, Annual Rev. Microbio. 38, 515.Google Scholar
  7. Giblin, A. E.: 1985, ‘Comparisons of the Processing of Elements by Ecosystems, II: Metals’, in P. J. Godfrey, E. R. Kaynor, S. Pelczarski, and J. Benforado (eds.), Ecological Considerations in Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Girts, M. A., and Kleinmann, R. L. P.: 1986, ‘Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage: A Preliminary Review’, in National Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  9. Godfrey, P. J., Kaynor, E. R., Pelczarski, S., and Benforado, J.: 1985. Ecological Considerations in Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  10. Greeson, P. E., Clark, J. R., and Clark, J. E.: 1978, Wetland Functions and Values. The State of Our Understanding, American Water Resources Assoc., Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  11. Huntsman, B. E., Solch, J. G., and Porter, M. D.: 1978, ‘Utilization of Sphagnum Species Dominated Bog for Acid Coal Mine Drainage Abatement’, Abstracts of the 91st Ann. Mtg. Geol Soc. Amer., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Hsu, P. H.: 1977, ‘Aluminum Hydroxides and Oxyhydroxides’, in J. B. Dixon and S. B. Weed (eds.), Minerals in Soil Environments, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  13. Kadlec, R. H., and Tilton, D. L.: 1979, CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental Control 9, 185.Google Scholar
  14. Kleinmann, R. L. P., Tiernan, T. O., Solch, J. G., and Harris, R. L.: 1983, ‘A Low-cost, Low Maintenance Treatment System for Acid Mine Drainage Using Sphagnum Moss and Limestone’, in S. B. Carpenter and R. W. DeVore (ed.), National Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  15. McLaren, R. G., and Crawford, D. V.: 1973, J. Soil Sci. 24, 172.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, W. P., and McFee, W. W.: 1983, J. Environ. Qual. 12, 29.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, W. P., McFee, W. W., and Kelly, J. M.: 1983, J. Environ. Qual. 12, 579.Google Scholar
  18. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R.: 1982, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, second ed., American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
  19. Shuman, L. M.: 1979, Soil Sci. 127, 10.Google Scholar
  20. Snedecor G. W., and Cochran, W. G.: 1978, Statistical Methods, sixth ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  21. Stone, R. W.: 1984, ‘The Presence of Iron- and Manganese-oxidizing Bacteria in Natural and Simulated Bogs’, in J. E. Burris (ed.), Treatment of Mine Drainage by Wetlands, Contribution No. 264, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
  22. Stover, R. C., Sommers, L. E., and Silviera, D. J.: 1976, J. Water Poll. Control Fed. 48, 2165.Google Scholar
  23. Tarleton, A. L., Lang, G. E., and Wieder, R. K.: 1984, ‘Removal of Iron from Acid Mine Drainage by Sphagnum Peat: Results from Experimental Laboratory Microcosms’, in D. H. Graves (ed.), National Symposium, on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  24. Tessler, A., Campbell, P. G. C., and Bisson, M.: 1979, Anal. Chem. 51, 844.Google Scholar
  25. United States Department of Agriculture: 1972, Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples, USDA Soil Survey Report of Investigations No. 1, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Wieder, R. K., and Lang G. E.: 1982, ‘Modification of Acid Mine Drainage in a Freshwater Wetland’, in B. R. McDonald (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Freshwater Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region, West Virginia University, Morgantown.Google Scholar
  27. Wieder, R. K., and Lang, G. E.: 1986, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 29, 309.Google Scholar
  28. Wieder, R. K., Lang, G. E., and Whitehouse, A. E.: 1985, ‘Metal Removal in Sphagnum-dominated Wetlands: Experience with a Man-made Wetland System’, in R. P. Brooks, D. E., Samuel and J. B. Hill (eds.), Wetlands and Water Management on Mined Lands, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
  29. Wieder, R. K., Lang G. E., and Whitehouse, A. E.: 1987, ‘Treatment of Acid Coal Mine Drainage Using Sphagnum Wetlands’, in B. Moldan and T. Paces (eds.), GEOMON, International Workshop on Geochemistry and Monitoring in Representative Basins, Geological Survey, Prague, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Klluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kelman Wieder
    • 1
  • Katherine P. Heston
    • 1
  • Ellen M. O'Hara
    • 1
  • Gerald E. Lang
    • 2
  • Alfred E. Whitehouse
    • 3
  • Jack Hett
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyVillanova UniversityVillanovaU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of BiologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownU.S.A.
  3. 3.Buffalo Coal CompanyBayardU.S.A.
  4. 4.Maryland State Highway DepartmentBureau of Landscape ArchitectureBrooklandvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations