Abstract
The Segregation Distortion (SD) phenomenon is a typical case of non-Mendelian segregation in Drosophila melanogaster, due to the dysfunction of sperm bearing a non-SD homologous chromosome. In nature, several factors involved in the expression of the SD phenomenon have been described; among these, a genetic modifier carried by chromosome 3, which enhances the distortion effect of the SD chromosomes. The analysis of natural Sardinian populations, carried out in order to evaluate the presence of chromosome 3 bearing these enhancer factors, has enabled us to ascertain that (a) also in these populations chromosomes 3 with enhancer factors are present, although with frequencies lower than those previously reported in other publications; (b) among these enhancer chromosomes 3, some increase the k of certain chromosomes 2 from values of chromosomes considered non-distorting (k≤0.66) to values typical of SD chromosomes. The data obtained also allow us to put forward some considerations regarding the dynamics of the SD phenomenon in Sardinian populations, where the frequency of SD chromosomes is fairly elevated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BrittnacherJ. G. & B.Ganetzky, 1983. On the components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. IX Deletion mapping and dosage analysis of the Sd locus. Genetics 108: 659–673.
BrittnacherJ. G. & B.Ganetzky, 1984. On the components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Nature of Enhancer of SD. Genetics 107: 423–434.
CrowJ. F., 1979. Geni che violano le leggi di Mendel. Le Scienze 128: 98–111.
GanetzkyB., 1977. On the components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 86: 321–355.
Golic, K., 1985. A modification of Segregation Distortion that suggests that elements affecting distortion are transposable. Genetics 110: s23.
HartlD. L.: 1970. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IX. Suppressors of Segregation Distorter in wild populations. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 594–600.
HartlD. L., 1973. Complementation analysis of male fertility among the segregation distorter chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics 73: 613–629.
HartlD. L., 1980. Genetic dissection of Segregation Distortion. III. Unequal recovery of reciprocal recombinants. Genetics 96: 685–696.
HartlD. L. and N.Hartung, 1975. High frequency of one element of Segregation Distorter in natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 29: 512–518.
HartlD. L., Y.Hiraizumi, and J. F.Crow, 1967. Evidence for sperm disfunction as the mechanism of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. natn. Acad. Sc. U.S.A. 58: 2240–2245.
HickeyD. A., A.Loverre and G.Carmody, 1986. Is the Segregation Distortion phenomenon in Drosophila due to recurrent active genetic transposition? Genetics 114: 665–668.
Hihara, Y.K., 1974. Genetic analysis of modifying system of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Two modifiers for SD system on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Japan J. Genet. 49: 209–222.
Hiraizumi, Y. & Y. Kataoka, 1965. Suppressing system of SD in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. A. Rep. Nat. Inst. Genet., Japan 16: 26.
Hiraizumi, Y., D. W. Martin, I. A. Eckstrand, 1980. A modified model of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 95: 693–706.
Hiraizumi, Y. & K. Nakazima, 1965. SD in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. Dros. Inf. Serv. 40: 72.
Hiraizumi, Y., L. Sandler & J. F. Crow, 1960. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Populational implications of the Segregation Distorter locus. Evolution 14: 433–434.
Hiraizumi, Y. & S. M. Thomas, 1984. Suppressor systems of Segregation Di storter (SD) chromosomes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106: 279–292.
Hiraizumi, Y. & S. S. Watanabe, 1969. Aging effect on the phenomenon of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 63: 121–131.
Kataoka, Y., 1967. A genetic system modifying Segregation Distortion in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. Jap. J. Genet. 42: 327–337.
Mange, E. J., 1968. Temperature sensitivity of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 53: 399–413.
Martin, D. W. & Y. Hiraizumi, 1979. On the models of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 93: 423–435.
Miklos, G. L. Gabor, 1972b. An investigation of the components of Segregation Distorter system in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 70: 405–418.
Miklos, G. L. Gabor, 1972b. The genetic structure of chromosomes carrying Segregation Distorter. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 14: 235–243.
Nicoletti, B., 1968. Il controllo genetico della meiosi Atti Ass. genet. ital. 13: 1–71.
Nicoletti, B. & A. Micheli, 1971. Further data on Segregation Distorter in Drosophila melanogaster. Second Europ. Res. Conf. (Abstract) Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicoletti, B., G. Trippa and A.de Marco, 1967. Reduced fertility in SD males and its bearing on Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti Acc. naz. Lincei 43: 383–392.
Pimpinelli, S. & P. Dimitri, 1986. Cytogenetic analysis of the Responder (Rsp) locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti Ass. gen. ital. 32: 163–164.
Sandler, L., 1962. A directed, permanent, genetic change involving the Segregation Distortion system in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 96: 161–166.
Sandler, L. & K. Golic, 1985. Segregation Distortion in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1: 181–185.
Sandler, L. and Y. Hiraizumi, 1960a. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Instability at the Segregation Distorter locus. Genetics 45: 1269–1287.
Sandler, L. & Y. Hiraizumi, 1960b. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. On the nature of the SD region. Genetics 45: 1671–1689.
Sandler, L. & Y. Hiraizumi, 1961. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VII. A heritable aging effect on the phenomenon of Segregation Distortion. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 3: 34–46.
Sandler, L., Y. Hiraizumi & I. Sandler, 1959. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. The cytogenetic basis of Segregation Distortion. Genetics 44: 223–250.
Sandler, L. & A. Rosenfeld, 1962. A genetically inducted, heritable modification of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4: 453–457.
Sharp, C. B., Hilliker, A. J. and Holm, D. G., 1985. Further characterization of genetic elements associated with the Segregation Distorter phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 110: 671–688.
Tanzarella, C., V. Spano', A. Micheli & B. Nicoletti, 1972. Localizzazione genetica e caratteristiche funzionali del fattore SDR-1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti Ass. gen. ital. 17: 108–109.
Temin, R. G. & M. Marthas, 1984. Factors influencing the effect of Segregation Distortion in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 107: 375–393.
Tokuyasu, K. T., W. J. Peacock & R. W. Hardy, 1972. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process. Z. Zellf. 124: 479–506.
Trippa, G., R. Cicchetti, A. Loverre and A. Micheli, 1981. Biological parameters and the Segregation Distortion (SD) phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 97: 563–580.
Trippa, G. and A. Loverre, 1972. Analisis di cromosomi secondi sensibili all'azione del cromosoma Segregation Distorter SDR-1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti Ass. gen. ital. 17: 114–117.
Trippa, G. and A. Loverre, 1975. A factor on a wild third chromosome that modifies the Segregation Distortion phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 26: 113–125.
Trippa, G., A. Loverre & R. Cicchetti, 1980. Studies on the Segregation Distortion (SD) phenomenon in Italian wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetika 12: 71–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cicchetti, R., Argentin, G. & Nicoletti, B. The segregation distortion (SD) phenomenon in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster: interaction between chromosomes 3 and SD chromosomes 2. Genetica 81, 77–84 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226445
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226445