Skip to main content

Complementarity of genes for resistance to greenbug [Schizaphis graminum (Rondani)], biotype E, in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Summary

Gene complementarity among various sources of resistance to greenbug biotype E was assessed. Analysis of the F2 generation of crosses between susceptible and resistant parents (mating 1) and among sources of resistance (mating 2) suggested that resistance in sorghum to greenbug biotype E was complexly inherited and, to some extent, dependent on the nature of both the resistant and susceptible parents. Positive transgressive segregation in the F2 generations of both matings was found to be due to effective plus factors, contributed by both parents in a cross, which complemented each other. The number of plus factors ranged from one to two in the susceptible parents and from two to five in the resistant parents of mating 1, and from one to five in the parents of mating 2. The consistently significant reciprocal effects shown by Sarvasi and PI264453 indicated that these sources had major factors for resistance in their cytoplasms, which were expressed in all their crosses. The results from this study indicated that the sources of resistance complemented each other to give increased number of F2 segregates with increased resistance. Thus, it should be possible to increase and diversify resistance of sorghum to greenbug biotype E by accumulating different, effective plus factors from various sources through recurrent selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Boozaya-Angoon D (1983) Sorghum resistance to insects. PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater/OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle WE (1922) An improved method of estimating the number of genetic factors concerned in cases of blending inheritance. Science 54:223

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AG Olunju, Bramel-Cox PJ, Reese JC, Harvey TL (1990) Mechanisms of resistance and their interaction to biotype E greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) in sorghum. J Econ Entomol 83:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackerott HL, Harvey TL (1971) Greenbug injury to resistant and susceptible sorghum in the field. Crop Sci 11:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackerott HL, Martin TJ, Harvey TL (1983) Breeding for resitance to greenbug, chinch bug, and maize dwarf mosaic in sorghum. Proc Annu Corn Sorghum Res Conf 38:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey TL, Hackerott HL (1969) Recognition of a greenbug biotype injurious to sorghum. J Econ Entomol 62:776–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PL, Frey KJ (1976) Inheritance of grain yield in oat species crosses Avena sauva L. x A. sterilis L. Egypt J Genet Cytol 5:400–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter KB, Peterson GL, Vise O (1982) A new greenbug biotype. Crop Sci 22:847–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Starks KJ, Burton RL (1977) Greenbugs: determining biotypes, culturing, and screening for plant resistance. With notes on rearing parasitoids. US Dep Agric Res Serv Tech Bull 1556

  • Teetes GL (1975) Insect resistance and breeding strategies in sorghum. Proc Annu Corn Sorghum Res Conf 30:32–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Teetes GL, Johnson JW (1973) Damage assessment of the green-bug on grain sorghum. J Econ Entomol 66:1181–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel DE, Starks KJ, Wood EA, Morrison RD (1972) Sorghum cultivars and progenies rated for resistance to greenbugs. Crop Sci 12:334–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1968) Evolution and the genetics of populations. 1. Genetic and biometric foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 90-106-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, A.G.O., Bramel-Cox, P.J. & Harvey, T.L. Complementarity of genes for resistance to greenbug [Schizaphis graminum (Rondani)], biotype E, in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 81, 105–110 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226119

Key words

  • Transgressive segregation
  • Epistasis
  • Frequency distribution
  • Castle-Wright formula
  • Number of effective factors