Skip to main content
Log in

A combined use of microprojectile bombardment and DNA imbibition enhances transformation frequency of canola (Brassica napus L.)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efforts to increase the frequency of recovered homozygous transgenic B. napus plants from direct DNA transformation treatments led to the development of a method of combined microprojectile bombardment and desiccation/DNA imbibition. The combined method was compared to individual treatments in two experiments utilizing microspore-derived embryo hyocotyls as targets for the β-glucuronidase (GUS) and NPT II genes. Both the transient gene expression of β-GUS and the stable transformation by NPT II demonstrated that the combined use of microprojectile bombardment and desiccation/DNA imbibition yielded more transgenic plants (at least three-times more) than either individual transformation protocol. In a histochemical analysis for β-GUS activity, an average of 37% of the hypocotyls receiving the combined treatment displayed a positive response, whereas only 8% of the hypocotyls showed a positive response following microprojectile bombardment alone. The hypocotyls obtained by the joint treatment also showed more multisite expression of the β-GUS gene per hypocotyl than those treated only with microprojectile bombardment. Southern analysis of NPT II gene integration into subsequently-derived secondary embryos indicated that the transformation efficiency of the combined treatment was 2% in comparison to 0.6% for that of the singular microprojectile bombardment. The number of inserts integrating per transformation event appears to be independent of the transformation methods. Neither of the marker genes was expressed in hypocotyls treated only with desiccation/DNA imbibition. Utilization of hypocotyl regeneration from microspore-derived embryos via a secondary embryogenesis system provided a reliable method for producing transgenic plants. The combined use of microprojectile bombardment and desiccation/DNA imbibition proved to be an efficient approach to obtain homozygous transgenic canola plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bidney D, Scelonge C, Martich J, Burrus M, Sims L, Huffman (1992) Microprojectile bombardment of plant tissues increases transformation frequency by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol 18:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL (1991) Evaluation of microspore culture in germ plasm preservation, lipid biosynthesis and DNA uptake studies in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PhD thesis, University of Guelph

  • Coventry J, Kott L (1988) Manual for microspore culture technique for Brassica napus. Crop Science Department, University of Guelph, Guelph. Ontario Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards K, Johnston C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1349

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root callus. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser CS, Fraley RT (1989) Genetically engineered plants for crop improvement. Science 244:1293–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould J, Devey M, Ulian EC, Hasegawa O, Peterson G, Smith RH (1991) Transformation of Zea mays L. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the shoot apex. Plant Physiol 95:426–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess D (1969) Versuche zur Transformation an hoheren Pflanzen: Induktion und Konstante Weitergabe der Anthocyansynthese bei Petunia hybrida. Z Pflanzenphysiol 60:348–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G, Johnson RD, Warren S (1989) Transformation of meristematic cells in the shoot apex of cultured pea shoots by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes. Protoplasma 148:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler HF, Somers DA, Rines HW, Cockburn AF (1992) Silicone carbide fiber-mediated stable transformation of plant cells. Theor Appl Genet 84:560–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Wolf ED, Wu R, Sanford JC (1987) High velocity microprojectile for delivering nucleic acids into living cells. Nature 327:70–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Harper EC, Svab Z, Sanford JC, Fromm ME, Maliga P (1988) Stable genetic transformation of intact Nicotiana cells by particle bombardment projectiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8502–8508

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhofs A, Behki R (1977) Prospects for plant genome modification by nonconventional methods. Annu Rev Genet 11:79–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhofs A, Eden FC, Chilton MD, Bendich AJ (1975) On the question of the integration of exogenous bacterial DNA into plant DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:2748–2752

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi S, Ohashi Y, Nakajima K, Arai Y (1990) An improved assay for β-glucuronidase in transformed cells: methanol almost completely suppresses a putative endogenous β-glucuronidase activity. Plant Sci 70:133–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux L, Huart R (1969) Fate of exogenous bacterial deoxyribonucleic acids in barley seedlings. J Mol Biol 43:243–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter R (1982) Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollens of Brassica napus. Z Pflanzenphysiol 105:427–434

    Google Scholar 

  • MaCabe DE (1988) Stable transformation of soybean by particle acceleration. Bio/Technology 6:923–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrutiu I, Shillito RD, Potrykus I, Biasini G, Sala F (1987) Hybrid genes in the analysis of transformation conditions. I. Setting up a simple method for direct gene transfer to protoplast. Plant Mol Biol 8:363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I (1990) Gene transfer to cereals: an assessment. Bio/Technology 8:535–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I (1991) Gene transfer to plants: assessment of published approaches and results. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:205–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1988) Extraction of DNA from plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biology Manual A6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrammeijer B, Sijmons PC, vanden Elzan JM, Hoekema (1990) Meristem transformation of sunflower via Agrobacterium. Plant Cell Rep 9:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Senaratna T, McKersie BD, Kasha JK, Procunier JD (1991) Direct DNA uptake during the imbibition of dry cells. Plant Sci 79: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillito I, Saul MW, Paszkowski J, Muller M, Potrykus I (1985) High frequency direct gene transfer to plants. Bio/Technology 3: 1099–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyfer VN (1980) Hereditary variability of plants under the action of exogenous DNA. Theor Appl Genet 58:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Topfer R, Gronenborn B, Schell J, Steinbiss HH (1989) Uptake and transient expression of chimeric genes in seed-derived embryos. Plant Cell 1:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulian EC, Smith RH, Gould JH, McKnight TD (1988) Transformation of plants via the shoot apex. In-vitro Cell Dev Biol 24: 951–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber G, Monajembashi S, Greeulich KO, Wolfrum J (1988) Microperforation of plant tissue with a UV laser microbeam and injection of DNA into cells. Naturwissenschaften 75: 35–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J.L., Beversdorf, W.D. A combined use of microprojectile bombardment and DNA imbibition enhances transformation frequency of canola (Brassica napus L.). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 88, 187–192 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225896

Key words

Navigation