Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of quantitative traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stability of various descriptive characters was studied over a 5-year period in 14 lines of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to determine the most appropriate time in a breeding programme when selection for these characters could be performed, and which lines could serve as potential parents. Various measures of stability were employed to analyse these data, including those proposed by Francis and Kannenberg (1978) and Lin and Binns (1988), appropriately modified for the purpose of this investigation. From these results it was concluded that selection for height, inflorescence size and developmental stage could be satisfactorily performed at an early stage of the breeding programme. For saponin content, however, the measuring techniques available were too insensitive to enable a recommendation to be made. Potential parents were identified in this material for use in the development of varieties suitable for North European conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker HC (1981a) Biometrical and empirical relations between different concepts of phenotypic stability. In: Gallais A (ed) Quantitative genetics and breeding methods. INRA, Versailles, pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker HC (1981b) Correlations among some statical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 30:835–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker HC, Léon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese EL (1969) The measurement and significance of genotypeenvironment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24:27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucio Alanis L (1966) Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. I: inbred lines. Heredity 21: 387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatunala T, Frey KJ (1976) Repeatability of regression stability indexes for grain yield of oats (Avena sativa L.). Euphytica 25:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis TR, Kannenberg LW (1978) Yield stability studies in shortseason maize. I: A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can J Plant Sci 58:1029–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgadóttir A, Kristjansdóttir K (1991) Simple approach to the analysis of G x E interaction in a multi-locational spaced plant trial with timothy. Euphytica 54:64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J (1975) Genotype-environment interactions — a challenge for plant breeding. J Agric Sci 85:477–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen S-E (1992) Anti-nutritional compounds in fodder crops. In: Proc 13th Nordic Postgraduate Course. Helsinki, Finland, pp 272/2-299

  • Jacobsen S-E, Stølen O (1993) Quinoa —morphology and phenology and prospects for its production as a new crop in Europe. Eur J Agron 2:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks JL, Pooni HS (1981) Comperative results of selection in the early and late stages of an inbreeding programme. Heredity 46:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozio MJ (1990) Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J Sci Food Agric 54:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS, Binns MR (1988) A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Can J Plant Sci 68:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26:894–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Freund RJ, Spector PC (1991) SAS system for linear models. SAS series in statistical applications. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinthus MJ (1973) Estimate of genotypic value: a proposed method. Euphytica 22:121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Price KR, Johnson IT, Fenwick GR (1987) The chemistry and biological significance of saponins in foods and feedingstuffs. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 26:27–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Risi J, Galwey NW (1989) The pattern of genetic diversity in the Andean grain crop quinoa. I: associations between characteristics. Euphytica 41:147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS/STAT (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1988) Estimates of stability for comparing varieties. Euphytica 39:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates F, Cochran WG (1938) The analysis of groups of experiments. J Agric Sci 28:556–580

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobsen, S.E., Hill, J. & Stølen, O. Stability of quantitative traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 110–116 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225735

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225735

Key words

Navigation