Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 85, Issue 6–7, pp 688–696 | Cite as

Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera Schachtii Schm.) from Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) to the Brassica napus L. gene pool by means of sexual and somatic hybridization

  • C. L. C. Lelivelt
  • E. H. M. Leunissen
  • H. J. Frederiks
  • J. P. F. G. Helsper
  • F. A. Krens
Originals

Summary

Sexual and somatic hybrid plants have been produced between Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) and Brassica napus L. (oil-seed rape), with the aim to transfer resistance to the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii Schm. (BCN) from white mustard into the oil-seed rape gene pool. Only crosses between diploid accessions of S. alba (2n = 24, Sa1Sa1) as the pistillate parent and several B. napus accessions (2n = 38, AACC) yielded hybrid plants with 31 chromosomes. Crosses between tetraploid accessions of S. alba (2n = 48, Sa1Sa1Sa1Sa1) and B. napus were unsuccessful. Somatic hybrid plants were also obtained between a diploid accession of S. alba and B. napus. These hybrids were mitotically unstable, the number of chromosomes ranging from 56 to more than 90. Analysis of total DNA using a pea rDNA probe confirmed the hybrid nature of the sexual hybrids, whereas for the somatic hybrids a pattern identical to that of B. napus was obtained. Using chloroplast (cp) and mitochondrial (mt) DNA sequences, we found that all of the sexual F1 hybrids and somatic hybrids contained cpDNA and mtDNA of the S. alba parent. No recombinant mtDNA or cpDNA pattern was observed. Three BC1 plants were obtained when sexual hybrids were back-crossed with B. napus. Backcrossing of somatic hybrids with B. napus was not successful. Three sexual hybrids and one BC1 plant, the latter obtained from a cross between a sexual hybrid and B. napus, were found to show a high level of BCN resistance. The level of BCN resistance of the somatic hybrids was in general high, but varied between cuttings from the same plant. Results from cytological studies of chromosome association at meiotic metaphase I in the sexual hybrids suggest partial homology between chromosomes of the AC and Sa1 genomes and thus their potential for gene exchange.

Key words

Intergeneric crosses Somatic hybridization Sinapis alba Brassica napus Heterodera schachtii Nematode resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdalla MMF, Hermsen JGTh (1972) Unilateral incompatibility: hypotheses, debate and its implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 21:32–47Google Scholar
  2. Agnihotri A, Gupta V, Lakshmikumaran MS, Shivanna KR, Prakash S, Jagannathan V (1990) Production of Eruca-Brassica hybrids by embryo rescue. Plant Breed 104:281–289Google Scholar
  3. Batra V, Prakash S, Shivanna KR (1990) Intergeneric hybridization between Diplotaxis siifolia, a wild species and crop brassicas. Theor Appl Genet 80:537–541Google Scholar
  4. Binding H, Nehls R, Jörgensen J (1982) Protoplast regeneration in higher plants. In: Fujiwara A (ed) Plant tissue culture 1982. Japanese association for plant tissue culture, Tokyo, pp 575–578Google Scholar
  5. Chiang MS, Chiang BY, Grant WF (1977) Transfer of resistance to race 2 of Plasmodiophora brassicae from Brassica napus to cabbage (B). oleracea var capitata. I. Interspecific hybridization between B. napus and B. Oleracea var ‘capitata’. Euphytica 26:319–336Google Scholar
  6. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21Google Scholar
  7. Delourme R, Eber F, Chèvre AM (1989) Intergeneric hybridization of Diplotaxis erucoides with Brassica napus. I. Cytogenetic analysis of F1 and BC1 progeny. Euphytica 41:123–128Google Scholar
  8. Eenink AH (1974) Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. I. Terminology, parthenogenesis in Cruciferae and the formation and usability of matromorphic plants. Euphytica 23:429–433Google Scholar
  9. Glimelius K (1984) High growth rate and regeneration capacity of hypocotyl protoplasts in some Brassicaceae. Physiol Plant 61:38–44Google Scholar
  10. Glimelius K, Fahleson J, Landgren M, Sjödin C, Sundberg E (1989) Somatic hybridization as a means to broaden the gene pool of cruciferous oil plants. Sver Utsädesfören Tidskr 99:103–108Google Scholar
  11. Haas JM de, Boot KJM, Haring MA, Kool AJ, Nijkamp HJJ (1986) A Petunia hybrida chloroplast DNA region, close to one of the inverted repeats, shows sequence homology with the Euglena gracilis chloroplast DNA region that carries the putative replication origin. Mol Gen Genet 202:48–54Google Scholar
  12. Heij HT de, Lustig H, Ee JH van, Vos YJ, Groot GSP (1985) Repeated sequences on mitochondrial DNA of Spirodela Oligorhiza. Plant Mol Biol 4:219–224Google Scholar
  13. Hossain MM, Inden H, Asahira T (1990) Seed vernalized interspecific hybrids through in vitro ovule culture in Brassica. Plant Sci 68:95–102Google Scholar
  14. Kreike CM, Koning JRA de, Krens FA (1990) Non-radioactive detection of single-copy DNA-DNA hybrids. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8:172–179Google Scholar
  15. Lelivelt CLC, Krens FA (1992) Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.) into the Brassica napus L. gene pool through intergeneric somatic hybridization with Raphanus sativus L. Theor Appl Genet 83:887–894Google Scholar
  16. Mathias R (1991) Improved embryo rescue technique for intergeneric hybridization between Sinapis species and Brassica napus. Crucif Newsl 14/15:90–92Google Scholar
  17. Menczel L, Wolfe K (1984) High frequency of fusion induced in freely suspended protoplast mixtures by polyethylene glycol and dimethylsulfoxide at high pH. Plant Cell Rep 3:196–198Google Scholar
  18. Mizushima U (1980) Genome analysis in Brassica and allied genera. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Biology and breeding. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 89–106Google Scholar
  19. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479Google Scholar
  20. Nishi S, Kuriyama T, Hiraoka T (1964) Studies on the breeding of Crucifer vegetables by interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. Bull Hortic Res Stn Jpn A3:161–250Google Scholar
  21. Pelletier G, Primard C, Vedel F, Chetrit P, Remy R, Rouselle P, Renard M (1983) Intergeneric cytoplasmic hybridization in Cruciferae by protoplast fusion. Mol Gen Genet 191:244–250Google Scholar
  22. Primard C, Vedel F, Mathieu C, Pelletier G, Chèvre AM (1988) Interspecific somatic hybridization between Brassica napus and Brassica hirta (Sinapis alba L.). Theor Appl Genet 75:546–552Google Scholar
  23. Ripley VL, Arinson PG (1990) Hybridization of Sinapis alba L. and Brassica napus L. via embryo rescue. Plant Breed 104:26–33Google Scholar
  24. Rouxel T, Renard M, Kollmann A, Bousquet J-F (1990) Brassilexin accumulation and resistance to Leptoshaeria Maculans in Brassica spp. and progeny of an interspecific cross B. Juncea x B. napus. Euphytica 46:175–181Google Scholar
  25. Sikdar SR, Chatterjee G, Das G, Sen SK (1990) ‘Erussica’, the intergeneric fertile somatic hybrid developed through protoplast fusion between Eruca sativa Lam. and Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Theor Appl Genet 79:561–567Google Scholar
  26. Sundberg E (1991) Somatic hybrids and cybrids within Brassicaceae. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SwedenGoogle Scholar
  27. Tai W, Ikonen H (1988) Incomplete bivalent pairing in dihaploids of Brassica napus L. Genome 30:450–457Google Scholar
  28. Toriyama K, Hinata K, Kameya T (1987) Production of somatic hybrid plants, ‘Brassicomoricandia’, through protoplast fusion between Moricandia arvensis and Brassica oleracea. Plant Sci 48:123–128Google Scholar
  29. Toxopeus H, Lubberts JH (1979) Breeding for resistance to the sugar beet nematode (Heterodera Schachtii Schm) in cruciferous crops. In: Marreuijk NPA van, Toxopeus H (eds). Proc Eucarpia Cruciferae Conf. (Post-conference edition). Wageningen, p 151Google Scholar
  30. Turesson G, Nordenskiöld H (1943) Chromosome doubling and cross combination in some cruciferous plants. Ann Agric College Sweden 11:201–206Google Scholar
  31. U N, Nagamatsu T, Mizushima U (1937) A report on meiosis in two hybrids, Brassica alba Rabh. x B. Oleracea L. and Eruca sativa Lam. x B. Oleracea L. Cytologia, Fujii Jubilee Vol 437–441Google Scholar
  32. Zenkteler M (1990) In-vitro fertilization of ovules of some species of Brassicaceae. Plant Breed 105:221–228.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. C. Lelivelt
    • 1
  • E. H. M. Leunissen
    • 1
  • H. J. Frederiks
    • 1
  • J. P. F. G. Helsper
    • 1
  • F. A. Krens
    • 1
  1. 1.DLO-Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO)AA WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations