Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ruthless Fed: A critique of the AST hypothesis

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

This paper examines the hypothesis that the Great Contraction was the result of rational rent-seeking by members of the Federal Reserve System. In contrast to the AST hypothesis, evidence on the share prices of member banks that survived the contraction suggests that the owners of these banks suffered an absolute decline in real wealth and a decline relative to a broad spectrum of other investment alternatives. Furthermore, monetary surprises had no statistically discernible effect on the share prices of these banks. This evidence conflicts with the notion that rational rent-seeking would lead the owners of member banks and their bureaucratic conspirators in the Federal Reserve System to unleash a policy with the goal of contracting the money supply by 35 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G.M., Shughart, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1988). A public choice theory of the Great Contraction. Public Choice 59: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwag, G.O., Kaufman, G. and Toevs, A. (1983). Duration: Its development and use in bond portfolio management. Financial Analysts Journal 39: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A.J. (1963). A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisel, S. and Jacobson, R. (1978). Interest rate changes and commercial bank revenues and costs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13: 687–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1945). The effect of interest rate increases on the banking system. American Economic Review 35: 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni, G.J. (1984). Interest rate risk and the stock prices of financial institutions. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 66: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1983). Preliminary evidence on the use of inputs in the Federal Reserve System. American Economic Review 73: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, M. (1982). Inflationary bias of the Federal Reserve System. Journal of Monetary Economics 10: 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, E.F. and Toma, M. (1983). Research activities and budget allocations among Federal Reserve Banks. Public Choice 45: 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Ball State University, 47306-0340, Muncie, IN

    G. J. Santoni & T. Norman Van Cott

Authors
  1. G. J. Santoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Norman Van Cott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santoni, G.J., Van Cott, T.N. The ruthless Fed: A critique of the AST hypothesis. Public Choice 67, 269–275 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224686

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224686

Keywords

Search

Navigation