Skip to main content
Log in

Selection response for litter size at birth and litter weight at weaning in the first parity in mice

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Five 60-pair lines of mice were selected for seven generations for the following criteria: number born alive (LSO), random selection of litters (LC), number born alive divided by the weight of the dam at 9 weeks (LSO/DWT), total litter weight weaned divided by the weight of the dam at 9 weeks (LWT/DWT), and weight of litter weaned (LWT). All traits were measured in the first parity only and litters were not standardized. Realized heritabilities for LSO, LWT, LSO/DWT, and LWT/ DWT were 0.10± 0.06, 0.11±0.07, 0.22 ± 0.04, and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively. Selection response for the two ratio lines was due to correlated responses in the respective numerators, LSO and LWT, as DWT did not decrease. In terms of improving LWT, selection for LWT/ DWT was three times as effective as selection for LSO/ DWT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker H, Wallinga JH, Politiek RD (1978) Reproduction and body weight of mice after long-term selection for large litter size. J Anim Sci 46:1572–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilharz RG (1982) The effect of inbreeding on reproduction in mice. Anim Prod 34:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilharz RG, Beilharz VC (1975) Observations on fighting behaviour of male mice (Mus musculus L.) Z Tierpsychol 39:126–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford GE (1969) Genetic control of ovulation rate and embryo survival in mice. 1. Response to selection. Genetics 61:905–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DC, Bywater TL (1963) The effect of selection for litter size and litter weight at weaning in mice maintained on two diets. Anim Prod 5:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson GE (1970) Efficiency of animal production. Moulding the biological components. J Anim Sci 30:849–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen EJ (1972) Long-term selection response for 12-day litter weight in mice. Genetics 72:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen EJ (1978) Single trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice. Genetics 88:781–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen EJ (1981) Predicting selection response for total litter weight. Z Tierz Zuechtungsbiol 98:55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen EJ, Saxton AM (1984) Effect of concurrent lactation and postpartum mating on reproductive performance in mice selected for large litter size. J Anim Sci 59:1224–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen EJ, Legates JE, Robison DW (1970) Selection for 12-day litter weight in mice. Genetics 64:511–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1955) Patterns of response in selection experiments in mice. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 20:178–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1965) Maternal effects and selection response. In: Geerts SJ (ed) “Genetics today”. Proc 11th Int Congr Genet Pergamon, Oxford, pp 763–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan JP, Eisen EJ, Legates JE (1973) Effects of population size and selection intensity on short-term response to selection for postweaning gain in mice. Genetics 73:513–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1972) Estimation of realized heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics 28:767–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Joakimsen O, Baker RL (1977) Selection for litter size in mice. Acta Agric Scand 27:301–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Land RB, Falconer DS (1969) Genetic studies of ovulation rate in the mouse. Genet Res 13:25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxford BG (1987) Genetic improvement of female reproductive performance by selection. Ph D thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JC (1982) The laboratory mouse as a model for animal breeding: a review of selection for increased bodyweight and litter size. Proc 2nd World Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod V:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai J, Eisen EJ, Emsley JAB, McAllister Aj (1978) Selection for nursing ability and adult weight in mice. Genetics 88:761–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RE, Robison OW (1976) Effects of postnatal litter size on reproduction of female mice. J Anim Sci 42:824–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves ECR (1955) The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 11:357–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WA Jr, White JM, Vinson WE (1974) Selection for increased 12-day litter weight in mice Theor Appl Genet 44:337–344

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSSX (1983) SPSSx. A complete guide to SPSSx language and operations. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steane DE, Roberts RC (1982) Selection for total weaning weight in the mouse, and its implications for domestic livestock. Z Tierz Zuechtungsbiol 99:222–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson JL (1986) Prenatal and postnatal effects in mouse lines selected for weaning weight. Proc 3rd World Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod XI: 443–447

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. J. Eisen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luxford, B.G., Beilharz, R.G. Selection response for litter size at birth and litter weight at weaning in the first parity in mice. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 80, 625–630 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224221

Key words

Navigation