Skip to main content
Log in

Noncoding chloroplast DNA variation in Mexican pines

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universal primers were used for PCR amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA in order to study restriction site variation in 12 Mexican pine species. Two length mutations were identified that are of diagnostic value for two subgenera or sections of the genus. Phylogenetic analysis of the restriction site and length variation showed patterns of variation largely consistent with previous arrangements of these pines, except for the position of Pinus nelsonii, indicating that Pinus section Parraya Mayr, as circumscribed by Little and Critchfield (1969) and later authors, is not a monophyletic group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich J, Cherney BW, Merlin E, Christopherson L (1988) The role of insertions/deletions in the evolution of the intergenic region between psbA and trnH in the chloroplast genome. Curr Genet 14:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Boscherini G, Morgante M, Rossi P. Vendramin GG (1994) Allozyme and chloroplast DNA variation in Italian and Green populations of Pinus leucodermis. Heredity 73:284–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase MW, Hills HH (1991) Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40:215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjon A (1984) Pines: drawings of the genus Pinus. Brill, Backhuys, Leiden

  • Farjon A, Styles J (1995) Flora Neotropica monograph. Pinus (Pinaceae). New York Botanic Garden, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris C, Oliver RP, Davy AJ, Hewitt GM (1993) Native oak chloroplast reveal an ancient divide across Europe. Mol Ecol 2:337–344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gielly L, Taberlet P (1994) The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Mol Biol Evol 11:769–777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golenberg EM, Clegg MT, Durbin ML, Doebley J, Ma DP (1993) Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston A (1992) Variation in the chloroplast genes rpoC1 and rpoC2 of the genus Astragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from restriction site mapping of a PCR-amplified fragment. Am J Bot 79:953–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston A, Rieseberg LH, Hanson MA (1992) Geographic partitioning of chloroplast DNA variation in the genus Datisca (Datiscaceae). Plant Syst Evol 181:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Little EL, Critchfield WB (1969) Subdivisions of the genus Pinus (pines). US Dep Agric For Serv Misc Publ 1144 Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manen J-F, Natali A, Ehrendorfer F (1994) Phylogeny of Rubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. Plant Syst Evol 190:195–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen V, Manen J-F, Douzery E, Spichger R (1994) Molecular phylogeny of the families related to the Celastrales based on rbcL 5′ flanking sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw GR (1909) The Pines of Mexico. Arnold Arboretum, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Spichger R, Savolainen V, Manen J-F (1993) Systematic affinities of Aquifoliaceae and Icacinaceae from molecular data analysis. Candollea 48:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles BT (1993) Genus Pinus: a Mexican purview. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot AF (eds) Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 397–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1993) PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1 user manual. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt AE, Wang X-R (1993) Molecular systematics and genetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris (L.) and P.densiflora (Sieb. & Zucc.). Theor Appl Genet 86:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham RCHJ, 'tHart H, Mes THM, Sandbrink JM (1994) Molecular evolution of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome in the Crassulaceae and related species. Curr Genet 25:558–566

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stein J, Hachtel W (1988) Deletions/insertions, short inverted repeats, sequences resembling aat-lambda, and frame-shift-mutated open reading frames are involved in chloroplast DNA differences in the genus Oenothera subsection Munzia. Mol Gen Genet 213:513–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DB, Nance WL, Nelson CD, Li T, Patel RN, Govindaraju DR (1992) Taxonomic patterns and inheritance of chloroplast DNA variation in a survey of Pinus echinata, Pinus elliotii, Pinus palustris and Pinus taeda. Can J For Res 22:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakasugi T, Tsudzuki J, Ito S, Shibata M, Suguira M (1994) A physical map and clone bank of the Black Pine (Pinus thunbergii) chloroplast genome. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-R, Szmidt AE (1993) Chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of Asian Pinus species (Pinaceae). Plant Syst Evol 188:197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS (1990) Genetic data analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perez de la Rosa, J., Harris, S.A. & Farjon, A. Noncoding chloroplast DNA variation in Mexican pines. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 91, 1101–1106 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223926

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223926

Key words

Navigation