Conclusions
The comparison of different selection indices is justified only if the indices are constrated to achieve the same profit function, even when each index is not optimized with respect to that profit function.
When a profit function is known and is non-linear, the desired gains index may be more efficient than the economic index. The optimum desired gains index should be determined by iterative techniques over several generations to compare the genetic progress with the economic index, because gains by the economic index are not linear and the changes observed in the initial generations of selection are not the same rates in future generations, although those changes are linear in the case of the desired gains index.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Itoh Y, Yamada Y (1988a) Comparisons of selection indexes achieving predetermined proportional gains. Genet Sel Evol 19:69
Itoh Y, Yamada Y (1988b) Linear selection indices for non-linear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 75:553
Gibson JP, Kennedy BW (1990) The use of constrained selection indexes in breeding for economic merit. Theor Appl Genet 80:801
Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28:476
Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15:10
Yamada Y, Yokouchi K, Nishida A (1975) Selection index when genetic gains of individual traits are of primary concern. Jap J Genet 50:33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by G. Wenzel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, Y. Are economic selection indices always superior to a desired gains index?. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 91, 655–658 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223293
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223293