Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Genetic causes of heterosis in juvenile aspen:a quantitative comparison across intra- and inter-specific hybrids

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genetic causes of heterosis in tree growth were investigated by a comparative genetic analysis of intra- and inter-specific crosses derived from Populus tremuloides and P. tremula. A new analytical method was developed to estimate the effective number of loci affecting a quantitative trait and the magnitudes of their additive and dominant effects across loci. The method combines the assumption of multiple alleles, as frequently found in outcrossing species, and the family structure analysis at different hierarchical levels. During the first 3 years of growth, interspecific hybrids displayed strong heterosis in stem growth, especially volume index, over intraspecific hybrids. By a series of joint analyses on the combining ability and the genetic component, we found that F1 heterosis might be due to overdominant interaction between two alleles, one from the P. tremuloides parent and the other from the P. tremula parent, at the same loci. This inference was derived from the finding that heterozygotes, newly formed through species combination, showed much greater growth than the heterozygotes from intraspecifc crosses at a reference locus. Heterosis in aspen growth appeared to be under multi-genic control, with a slightly larger number of loci for stem diameter and volume (9–10) than for height (6–8). For traits with non-significant heterosis, such as stem allometry and internode number and length, the number of underlying loci seemed to be much fewer (3–4). While additive effects appeared to influence seedling traits collectively across loci, a few major dominant loci had much larger effects on stem growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Abelson P (1991) Improved yields of biomass. Science 252:1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawshaw HD Jr, Stettler RF (1995) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. Genetics 139:963–973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce AB (1910) The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32:627–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF (1952) Dominance and overdominance. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 282–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28:454–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster ER (1942) “Mock dominance”. Science 97:464–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J, Stec A (1991) Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129:285–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, Stec A (1993) Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134:559–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995) Teosinte branched l and the origin of maize:evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141:333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • East EM (1936) Heterosis. Genetics 21:375–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck HJ van, Jacobs JME, Stam P, Ton J, Stiekema WJ, Jacobsen E (1994) Multiple alleles for tuber shape in diploid potato detected by quantitative genetic analysis using RFLPs. Genetics 137:303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular-marker-facilitated investigation of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Einspahr DW (1984) Production and utilization of triploid hybrid aspen. Iowa State J Res 58:401–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GS, Shaw DV (1988) Using clonal replicates to explore genetic variation in a perennial plant species. Theor Appl Genet 76:788–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory WC (1965) Mutation frequency, magnitude of change and the probability of improvement in adaptation. Radiat bot 5 (Suppl):429–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory WC (1966) Multation breeding. In:Frey KJ (ed) Plant breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 189–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1990) Use of a controlled-nutrient experiment to test heterosis hypotheses. Genetics 126:753–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Groover A, Devey M, Fiddler T, Lee J, Megraw R, Mitchel-Olds T, Sherman B, Vujcic S, Williams C, Neale D (1994) Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing wood specific gravity in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine. Genetics 138:1293–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes HK (1952) Development of the heterosis concept. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman PE, Stettler RF (1985) Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a four-year plantation. Can J For Res 15:376–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimburger C (1936) Report on poplar hybridization. For Chron 12:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimburger C (1968) Poplar breeding in Canada. In: Growth and utilization of poplars in Canada. Can Dept For Rural Dev, No 1205, pp 88–100

  • Jinks JL, Jones ZM (1958) Estimation of the components of heterosis. Genetics 43:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacser H, Burns JA (1981) The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97:639–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble F, Pellew C (1910) The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). J Genet 1:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonards-Schippers C, Gieffers W, Schafer-Pregl R, Ritter E, Knapp SJ, Salamini F, Gebhardt C (1994) Quantitative resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato: a case study for QTL mapping in a allogamous plant species. Genetics 137:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B (1995) Aspen improvement strategies for western Canada-Albert and Saskatchewan. For Chron 71:720–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wyckoff GW (1991) A breeding strategy to improve aspen hybrids for the University of Minnesota Aspen/Larch Genetics Cooperative. In:Proc Int Energy Agency Joint Meet, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, pp 33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wyckoff GW, Einspahr DW (1993) Hybrid aspen performance and genetic gains. North J Apple For 10:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior GH, Seitz FW (1966) Einige ergebnisse bei testanbauten mit aspenhybriden. Silvae Genet 15:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Minvielle F (1987) Dominance is not necessary for heterosis: a two-locus model. Genet Res 49:245–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Olds T (1995) Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidoposis. Genetics 140:1105–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrdiek O (1979) Juvenile-mature and trait correlations in some aspen and poplar trials. Silvae Genet 28:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrdiek O (1980) Untersuchungen zur Eignung von Aspeneltern fur die Kreuzungszuchtung. Holzzucht 35:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll RH, Kojima K, Robinson HF (1962) Components of yield and overdominance in corn. Crop Sci 2:78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhle-Larsen C (1970) Recent advances in polar breeding. Int Rev For Res 3:1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factor underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauley SS, Johnson AJ, Santamour FS Jr (1963a) Results of aspen screening tests. II. Seed sources of European aspen (P. Tremula Linnaeus). Minn For Notes, No. 137

  • Pauley SS, Johnson AJ, Santamour FS Jr (1963b) Results of aspen screening tests. III. F1 hybrid progenies of trembling x European aspen. Minn For Notes, No. 138

  • Richey FD (1942) Mock-dominance and hybrid vigor. Science 96:280–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell FW, Cockerham CC (1992) Multiplicative vs arbitrary gene action in heterosis. Genetics 131:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Am Breed Assoc 4:298–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Spickett SG, Thoday JM (1966) Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes. Genet Res 7:96–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stettler RF (1968) Irradiated mentor pollen:its use in remote hybridization of black cottonwood. Nature 219:746–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Stettler RF, Fenn RC, Heilman PE, Stanton BJ (1988) Populus Trichocarpa x Populus deltoides hybrids for short rotation culture: variation patterns and four-year field performance. Can J For Res 18:745–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27:205–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN Jr (1975) Quantitative variation and gene number. Nature 258:665–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W (1959) Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters. Nature 184:527–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1922) The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea pigs. III. Crosses between highly inbred families. Tech Bull US Dept Agric 1121

  • Wu R, Stettler RF (1995) The genetic resolution of juvenile canopy structure and function in a three-generation pedigree of Populus. Trees (in press)

  • Wu RL, Wang MX, Huang MR (1992) Quantitative genetics of yield breeding for Populus short rotation culture.I. Dynamics of genetic control and selection model of yield traits. Can J For Res 22:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominances is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QLT analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z-B (1992) Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics 131:987–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel BJ, Talbert T (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufa L (1969) Poplar breeding in Canada. For Chron 45:402–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsuffa L (1975) A summary review of interspecific breeding in the genus Populus. In:Proc 14th Meeting Canadian Tree Improvement Assoc, Part 2. Canadain Forest Service, Ottawa, pp 107–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. B. Li & R. Wu

    Present address: Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, 27695, Raleigh, NC, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA

    B. Li

  2. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, 98195-2100, Seattle, WA, USA

    R. Wu

Authors
  1. B. Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by P.M.A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, B., Wu, R. Genetic causes of heterosis in juvenile aspen:a quantitative comparison across intra- and inter-specific hybrids. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 380–391 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223180

Key words