Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 541–546 | Cite as

Diagnosis of partial and complete rotator cuff tears using combined gradient echo and spin echo imaging

  • Michael J. Tuite
  • Donald R. Yandow
  • Arthur A. DeSmet
  • John F. Orwin
  • Fernando A. Quintana
Articles

Abstract

Most magnetic resonance (MR) studies evaluating the rotator cuff for tears have used T2-weighted imaging in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes, T2*-weighted gradient echo imaging, however, has advantages over spin echo imaging, including contiguous slices without cross-talk, high contrast around the cuff, and intrinsically shorter imaging times which can be used to increase the number of signals averaged and thus improve the signal-to-noise ratio. We reviewed the shoulder MR scans of 87 consecutive patients who underwent both a MR scan and a shoulder arthroscopy during which the size of tears, if present, was graded. The reviewers were blinded as to the history and arthroscopic results. The MR scans included oblique coronal T2*-weighted gradient echo and oblique sagittal T2-weighted spin echo images. MR cuff grades were correlated with arthroscopic findings. For complete tears, the sensitivity of MR was 0.91 and the specificity 0.95. For partial tears, the sensitivity was 0.74 and the specificity 0.87. This accuracy is similar to two-plane T2-weighted imaging as previously reported in the literature. There was a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.0005) between the cuff grade as determined by MR and the arthroscopic findings.

Key words

Rotator cuff Shoulder Magnetic resonance imaging Partial tear Gradient echo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burk DL, Karasick D, Kurtz AB, et al. Rotator cuff tears: prospective comparison of MR imaging with arthrography, sonography and surgery. AJR 1989; 153: 87.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evancho AM, Stiles RG, Fajman WA, et al. MR imaging diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. AJR 1988; 151: 751.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991; 73: 17.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pigeau I, Doursounian L, Maigne JY. Rotator cuff pathology: gradient-echo MR imaging comparison with arthrography and surgery. Radiology 1989; 173(P): 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rafii M, Firooznia H, Sherman O, et al. Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 177: 817.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seeger LL, Gold RH, Bassett LW, Ellman H. Shoulder impingement syndrome: MR findings in 53 shoulders. AJR 1988; 150: 343.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Traughber PD, Goodwin TE. Shoulder MRI: arthroscopic correlation with emphasis on partial tears. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 129.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zlatkin MB, Iannotti JP, Roberts MC, et al. Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 172: 223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holt RG, Helms CA, Steinbach L, Neumann C, Munk PL, Genant HK. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: rationale and current applications. Skeletal Radiol 1990; 19: 5.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaplan PA, Bryans KC, Davick JP, Otte M, Stinson WW, Dussault RG. MR imaging of the normal shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiology 1992; 184: 519.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resendes M, Helms CA, Eddy R, Knox K. Double-echo MPGR imaging of the rotator cuff. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 1077.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vahlensieck M, Pollack M, Lang P, Grampp S, Genant HK. Two segments of the supraspinatus muscle: cause of high signal intensity at MR imaging? Radiology 1993; 186: 449.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vahlensieck M, Resendes M, Lang PH, Genant H. Shoulder MRI: the subacromial/subdeltoid bursa fat stripe in healthy and pathologic conditions. Eur J Radiol 1992; 14: 223.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kessel L, Watson M. The painful arch syndrome: clinical classification as a guide to management. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1977; 59: 166.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snyder SJ. Evaluation and treatment of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24: 173Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snedecor G, Cochran W. Statistical methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1980: 1–507.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kneeland JB, Middleton WD, Carrera GF, et al. MR imaging of the shoulder: diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. AJR 1987; 149: 333.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelson MC, Leather GP, Nirschl RP, et al. Evaluation of the painful shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991; 73: 707.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Snyder SJ. Rotator cuff lesions. Acute and chronic. Clin Sports Med 1991; 10: 595Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Link SC, Erickson SJ, Timins ME. MR imaging of the ankle and foot: normal structures and anatomic variants that may simulate disease. AJR 1993; 161: 607.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Skeletal Society 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Tuite
    • 1
  • Donald R. Yandow
    • 1
  • Arthur A. DeSmet
    • 1
  • John F. Orwin
    • 2
  • Fernando A. Quintana
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin HospitalMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin HospitalMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of Wisconsin HospitalMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations