Skip to main content
Log in

The See-Saw Effect: a multilevel problem?

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of school effectiveness often use measures of association, such as regression weights and correlation coefficients. These statistics are used to estimate the size of the change or “effect” that would occur in one variable (for example reading ability) given a particular change in another variable (for example sex and sex ratio). In this paper we explore the limitations of regression coefficients for use in a contextual analysis, in which both individual and contextual variables are included as independent variables. In our example “individual sex” and a context variable “sex ratio of the schoolclass” are regressors, and reading ability is the dependent variable. Our conclusion is that researchers should be careful making interpretations of effects from multiple regression analysis, when dealing with aggregate data. Even in the case (as in our example) when individual and contextual variables are made orthogonal to avoid multicollinearity, interpretation of the effects of the aggregate variable is problematical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AitkinM. & LongfordN. (1986) “Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 149 (part 1): 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoydL.H. & IversenG.R. (1979) Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, L. (1980). “The role of levels of analysis in the specification of educational effects”, pp. 116–190, Dreeben, R. & Thomas, J.A. (eds) Analysis of Educational Productivity, Vol. 1. Issues in Micro-Analysis.

  • CliffN. (1983). “Some cautions concerning the application of causal modelling methods”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 18: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • ColemanJ.S., CampbellE.Q., HobsonC.F., McPharlandJ., MoodA.M., WeifeldF.D. & YorkR.L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity, Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • CronbachL.J. & WebbN. (1975). “Between class and within class effects in a reported aptitude x treatment interaction: Reanalysis of a study by G.L. Anderson”, Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 717–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeeuwJ. & KreftG.G. (1986). “Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis”, Journal of Educational Statistics 11: 1, 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • EfronB. (1979): “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife”, Annals of Statistics 7: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarnqvistK. (1978). “Primary mental ablities at collective and individual levels”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 70: 706–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • HoxJ.J. & DeLeeuwE.D. (1986). “De invloed van individuele en contextuele kenmerken op schoolbeleving en leerprestatie”, J.C.Van derWolf & J.J.Hox (eds), Kwaliteit van Onderwijs in Het Geding. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • JencksC. (1973). Inequality, a Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LazarsfeldP.F. (1959). “Problems in methodology”, R.K.Merton, L.Broom & L.S.Cottrell (eds.), Sociology Today, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LazarsfeldP.F. & MenzelH. (1961). “On the relation between indicidual and collective properties”, A.Etzioni (ed.), Complex Organizations. New York. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • MasonW.M., WongG.Y. & EntwistleB. (1983). “Contextual analysis through the multilevel linear model”, S.Leinhardt (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1983. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MayeskeG.W., OkadaT. & BeatonA.E.jr. (1973). A Study of Attitude Toward Life of our Nation's Students. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • MostellerF. & MoynihanD.P. (1972). On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MostellerF. & TukeyJ.W. (1968). “Data analysis, including statistics”, G.Lindzey & E.Aronson (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • OosthoekH. & Van derEedenP., (eds), (1984) Education from the Multilevel Perspective: Models, Methodology, and Empirical Findings. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • RobinsonW.S. (1950) “Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals”, American Sociological Review 15: 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van denEedenP. & HuttnerH. J. M. (1982). Multilevel Research, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreft, G.G., de Leeuw, E.D. The See-Saw Effect: a multilevel problem?. Qual Quant 22, 127–137 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223037

Key words

Navigation