Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of highly polymorphic DNA regions in tomato

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper describes the use of oligonucleotide probes to reveal highly polymorphic DNA regions in pomato. With a (GATA)4 probe the level of polymorphism detected is high enough to identify all 15 tomato cultivars used in this study. Individual plants of one cultivar all showed the same cultivar-specific DNA-finger-print. In an F2-population of self-fertilized cv. Sonatine, GATA-containing loci segregated in a Mendelian (3∶1) fashion. Experiments with in-vitro propagated plant material showed that the DNA-fingerprints are not affected by tissue-culture procedures. This indicates that changes in the genetic integrity, which often accompany in-vitro propagation (somaclonal variation), are not extended to the DNA detected with the (GATA)4 probe. The relative high stability and the Mendelian segregation of (GATA)4-derived DNA-fingerprints make them ideally suited for identification of tomato cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Genetics of actin-related sequences in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 72:314–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitenkamp J, Ammer H, Geldermann H (1991) DNA-fingerprinting in domestic animals. Electrophoresis 12:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas JF (1988) Detection of DNA “fingerprints” of cultivated rice by hybridization with a human minisatellite DNA probe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6831–6835

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporte SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant molecular DNA minipreparation. Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Epplen JT (1988) On simple repeated GAT/CA sequences in animal genomes: A critical reappraisel. J Heredity 79:409–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ (1985) Forensic application of DNA-fingerprints. Nature 318:577–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A (1991) On the current understanding of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 7:1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnlein U, Dawe Y, Zadworny D, Gavora JS (1989) DNA-fingerprinting: a tool for determining genetic distances between strains of poultry. Theor Appl Genet 77:669–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeguer R, Ganal MW, Steffens JC, Tanksley SD (1991) Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol Biol 16:753–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Leppert M, O'Connell P, Wolff R, Holm T, Culver M, Martin C, Fujimoto E, Hoff M, Kumlin E, White R (1987) Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) markers for human gene mapping. Science 235:1616–1622

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda I, Zischler H, Epplen C, Guttenbach M, Schmid M (1991) Chromosomal organization of simple repeated DNA sequences used for DNA-fingerprinting. Electrophoresis 12:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Nürnberg P, Barth I, Fuhrmann E, Lenzner C, Losanova T, Peters C, Pöche H, Thiel G (1991) Monitoring genomic alterations with a panel of oligonucleotide probes specific for various simple repeat motifs. Electrophoresis 12:186–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6463–6471

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Renz M (1984) Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 12:4127–4138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzuri G, Hillel J, Lavi U, Haberfeld A, Vainstein A (1991) DNA-fingerprint analysis of ornamental plants. Plant Sci 76:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulk RW, Löffler HJM, Lindhout WH, Koornneef M (1990) Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and comparison with chemical mutagenesis. Theor Appl Genet 80:817–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Beek H, Verkerk R, Zabel P, Lindhout P (1992) Mapping strategy for resistance genes in tomato based on RFLPs between cultivars: CF9 (resistance to Cladosporium fulvum) on chromosome 1. Theor Appl Genet 84:106–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten WHJ, Van Heusden AW, Van der Voort JR, Raijmann L, Bachmann K (1991) Hypervariable DNA-fingerprint loci in Microseris-Pygmaea (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Bot Acta 104:252–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Weigand F, Driesel AJ, Kahl G, Zischler H, Epplen JT (1989) Polymorphic simple GATA/GACA repeats in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 17:10128

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Beyermann B, Ramser J, Kahl G (1991) Plant DNAfingerprinting with radioactive and digoxygenated oligonucleotide probes complementary to simple repetitive DNA sequences. Electrophoresis 12:159–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Salamini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vosman, B., Arens, P., Rus-Kortekaas, W. et al. Identification of highly polymorphic DNA regions in tomato. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 85, 239–244 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222865

Key words

Navigation