Abstract
The concept of “face validity”, used in the sense of the contrast between “face validity” and “construct validity”, is conventionally understood in a way which is wrong and misleading. The wrong view had relatively limited consequences for research practice per se. However, it is a serious obstacle in theoretical discussions of certain “philosophical” or “foundational” issues. In this brief note I would like to point out the logical defect in the conventional position and correct it by making the necessary distinctions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CronbachL.J. and MeehlP.E. (1955). “Construct validity in psychological tests”, Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302.
HempelC.G. (1970). “On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theories”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4: 142–163.
KuhbT.S. (1961). “The function of quantification in modern physical science”, in H.Woolf (ed.), Quantification. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
MosierC.I. (1947). “A critical examination of the concepts of face-validity” Educational and Psychological Measurement 7: 191–206.
SelltizC., JahodaM., DeutschM. and CookS. (1959). Research methods in social relations (revised). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented to the Methodology Section of the 1977 Meetings of the Southern Sociological Society Atlanta, Georgia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, S.P. The concept of face validity. Qual Quant 13, 85–90 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222826
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222826