Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on intact neuroblastoma × glioma NG108-15 cell upon induced differentiation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Studies have established that major increases in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAchR) binding in the brain appear to coincide with synaptogenesis. The neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid NG108-15 cell line has been demonstrated to possess numerous functional characteristics of intact neurons, including synapse formation with myotubes. The present study examines and characterizes the mAchR on the hybrid NG108-15 cells during differentiation, induced by 1 mM dBcAMP. Specific binding of [3H]-QNB for differentiated cells increases gradually to a final level of 130% (P < 0.05) over the control undifferentiated cells during the first 24 hr of incubation. Further, this increase of receptor sites appears to correlate proportionately to the degree of neurite extension of the differentiating cells. The dissociation rate constant at equilibrium (Kd) and maximum binding capacity (Bmax) have been determined to be 5.6 nM and 920 fmol/106 cells, respectively, for differentiated cells, and 4.4 nM and 400 fmol/106 cells, respectively, for undifferentiated cells. Computer analyses of the data obtained from saturation experiments reveal a single class of binding sites for [3H]-QNB on both differentiated and undifferentiated cells. The Hill plot analysis of the QNB-binding indicates a Hill coefficient (nH) of 1.0 and 0.91 for differentiated and undifferentiated cells, respectively, suggesting the unity of receptor sites with no co-operativity. Our results depict that increases of mAchRs on intact cells correlate with the degree of cellular differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galant SP, Allred S: Binding and functional characteristics of beta-adrenergic receptors in the intact neutrophil. J Lab Clin Med 98:227–237, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nadler JV, Mathews DA, Eotman CW, Lynch GS: Development of cholinergic innervation in hippocampal formation of the rat: quantitative changes in choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase activities. Develop Biol 36:142–154, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dudai Y, Yavin E: Ontogenesis of muscarinic receptors and acetylcholinesterase in differentiating rat cerebral cells in culture. Brain Res 155:368–373, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parad KN: Differentiation of neuroblastoma cells in culture. Biol Rev 2:129–165, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haffke SC, Seeds NW: Neuroblastoma: the E. coli of neurobiology Life Sci 16:1649–1658, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  6. Waymire JC, Gilmer WK, Noritake D, Kitayama D, Haycock JW: Induction of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine beta hydroxylase in cultured mouse neuroblastoma by 8Br-cAMP. Mol Pharmacol 15:78–85, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simantov R, Sachs L: Regulation of acetylcholine receptors in relation to acetylcholinesterase in neuroblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:2902–2925, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dahms NM, Schnaar RL: Ganglioside composition is regulated during differentiation in the neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid NG108–15 cell line. J Neurosci 3:806–818, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniels MP, Hamrecht B: The ulterastructure of neuroblastoma × glioma somatic cell hybrids. J Cell Biol 63:691–699, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christian CN, Nelson PG, Peacock J, Nirenberg M: Synapse formation between two clonal cell lines. Science 196:995–998, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson PG, Christian CN, Daniels MP, Henkart M, Bullock P, Mullinax D, Nirenberg M: Formation of synapses between cells of a neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid clone and mouse myotubes. Brain Res 147:245–259, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  12. Repke H, Maderspach K: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on cultured glial cells. Brain Res 232:206–211, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strange PG, Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV: Ligand binding properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Biochem J 172:495–501, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275, 1951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McPherson GA: A practical computer-based approach to the analysis of radioligand binding experiments. Comput Program Biomed 17:107–113, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bottenstein JE: Differentiated properties of neuronal cell lines. In: Sato G (ed) Functionally Differentiated Cell Lines. Alan R Liss Inc, New York, 1981, pp 155–184

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ben Barak J, Dudai Y: Cholinergic binding site in rat hippocampal formation: properties and ontogensis. Brain Res 166:245–257, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  18. El. Fakahany EE, Rrichelson E: Regulation of muscarinic receptor mediated cyclic GMP synthesis by cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. J Neurochem 35:941–948, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zalcman SJ, Neckers LM, Kaayalp O, Wyatt RJ: Muscarinic cholinergic binding sites on intact human lymphocytes. Life Sci 29:69–73, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burgermeister W, Klein WL, Nirenberg M, Witktop B: Comparative binding studies with cholinergic ligands and histrionicotoxin at muscarinic receptors of neuronal cell line. Mol Pharmacol 14:751–767, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shimohama S, Taniguchi T, Fujiwara M, Kameyama M: Changes in nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in Alzheimer-Type Dementia. J Neurosci 46:288–293, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bidart JM, Moingeon PH, Bohuon C: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on circulating human lymphocytes. Res Commun Pathol Pharmacol 3:169–172, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  23. Opker A, Abood LG, Hoss W Lionetti FJ: Streoselective muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and opiate receptors in human phagocytic leukocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 29:1361–1365, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  24. Strom TB, Lane MA, George K: The parallel time-dependent: Bimodal change in lymphocyte cholinergic binding activity and cholinergic influence upon lymphocyte-mediate cytotoxicity after lymphocyte activation. J Immunol 127:705–710, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer SK, Agranoff BW: Calcium and muscarinic synaptosomal phospholipid labeling effect. J Neurochem 34:1231–1240, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peralta GE, Ashkenazi A, Winslow JW, Smith DH, Ramachandra J, Capon DJ: Distinct primary structure, ligand-binding properties and tissue-specific expression of four human mucarinic acetylcholine receptors. EMBO J 6:3923–3929, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maderspach K, Fajszi C: Beta-adrenergic receptors of brain cells. Membrane integrity implies apparent positive co-operativity and higher affinity. Biochim Biophys Acta 692:469–478, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  28. Feigenbaum P, El. Fakahany EE: Regulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptor density in neuroblastoma cells by brief exposure to agonist: possible involvement in desensitization of receptor function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 233:134–140, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carson S, Godwin S, Massoulie J, Kato G: Solubilization of atropine binding material from brain. Nature 266:176–178, 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghahary, A., Cheng, K.W. Characterization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on intact neuroblastoma × glioma NG108-15 cell upon induced differentiation. Mol Cell Biochem 86, 181–188 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222618

Key words

Navigation