Skip to main content
Log in

Origins of replication and gene regulation

  • Current Thinking
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Eukaryotic chromosomes appear to consist of many replicons, the time of replication of which is probably controlled by specific origins. However, plasmids without specific eukaryotic origins may also replicate in some cells when injected into nuclei or transferred during transformation. The efficiency and the mechanisms of their initiation are still uncertain. A number of reports are cited which indicate that natural eukaryotic DNAs initiate their replication from specific origins. The nature of these origins are known in only a few instances and no general conclusions can yet be given about the nucleotide sequences involved. Short dispersed repeats of the Alu type appear to function as origins since they enhance the efficiency of replication of vector plasmids in Xenopus eggs. Certain sequences from a variety of eukaryotic DNAs also enhance the replicative potential of plasmids in yeast cells. The common features of such initiators or enhancers is uncertain. If dispersed repeats are origins in mammalian chromosomes, the number appears to be excessive. Either only a subset are functional, or the functional ones are only suborigins in larger replicons in which master origins (not yet isolated) function in the regulation of the timing of replication.

Evidence is cited which indicates that the regulation of the time of replication of a gene or gene cluster is part of a regulatory system that makes the DNA available for transcription or leaves it in an inactive state. About one-half the DNA in mammalian cells is replicated in the first half of S phase (SE) After a brief pause in mid-S phase, the remainder of the DNA is replicated in what is designated late S (SL). The fractions replicated in SE and SL may vary in other phylogenetic groups, but wherever division of differentiated cells occurs such fractions are likely to be found. The following hypothesis is proposed. The DNA replicated in SL is suppressed in transcription, if it has the appropriate promoter regions, because the newly replicated DNA is complexed with proteins that suppress transcription. These proteins are only available during SL. Those genes replicated in SE are complexed with a different set of proteins which leave the promoter regions open for transcription when the appropriate regulatory molecules are available. In this way an inactive state or potentially active state can be transmitted from one cell generation to the next.

Evidence is cited which indicates that genes which are active in all cells at some stage in the cell cycle are replicated in SE. Other genes which are required in only some tissue or tissues are replicated in SL in all cells except those where the genes are potentially functional. This means that some origins always operate in SE and perhaps some operate only in SL, but other origins can be modified to operate in either SE or SL.

The modification may involve methylation of origins since azacytidine has recently been reported to shift the time of replication of segments of chromosomes as well as change genes to a potentially function state by leading to the deletion of cytosine methylation which is normally maintained at specific sites by DNA methyl transferases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axel R, Feigelson P, Schutz G: Analysis of the complexity and diversity of mRNA from chicken liver and oviduct. Cell 7:247–254,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blumenthal AB, Kriegstein HJ, Hogness DS: The units of DNA replication in Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes. Cold Spr Harb Symp Quant Biol 38:205–223, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Botchan PM, Dayton AI: A specific chromosomal origin in the chromosomal rDNA of Lytechinus variegatus. Nature 299:453–456, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bozzoni I, Baldari CT, Auraldi F, Buongiorno-Mardelli M: Xenopus amplified ribosomal genes initiate replication in non-transcribed spacer regions. Eur J Biochem 118:585–590, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brimster RL, Chen HY, Warren R, Sarthy A, Palmiter RD: Regulation of metallothionein-thymidine kinase fusion plasmids injected into mouse eggs. Nature 296:39–42, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown EH, Schildkraut CL: Perturbation of growth and differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia cells by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in early S phase. J Cell Physiol 99:261–278, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callan HG: Replication of DNA in chromosomes of eukaryotes. Proc Roy Soc London B 181:19–41, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capecchi MR: High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell 22:479–488, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chambers JC, Watanabe S, Taylor JH: Dissection of a replication origin in Xenopus DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5572–5576, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang HL, Baserga R: Time of replication of genes responsible for a temperature-sensitive function in a cell cycle-specific is mutant from a hamster cell line. J Cell Physiol 92:333–344, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D'Andrea AD, Tantravaki U, Perle MA, Latt SA: High resolution analysis of the timing of replication of specific DNA sequences during S phase of mammalian cells. Nucl Acids Res 11:4753–4774, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan C, Biro PA, Choudary PV, Elder JT, Wang RRC, Forget BG, de Riel JK, Weissman SM: RNA polymerase III transcriptional units are interpersed among human non-α-globin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5095–5099, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutrillaux B, Couturier J, Richer C-L, Viegas-Pequignot E: Sequence of DNA replication in 277 R- and Q-bands of human chromosomes using BrdU treatment. Chromosoma 58:51–61,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edenberg JH, Huberman JA: Eukaryotic chromosome replication. Ann Rev Genet 9:245–284, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epner E, Rifkind RA, Marks PA: Replication of and β-globin DNA sequences occurs during early S phase in murine erythroleukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3058–3062, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fritsch EF, Shen CKJ, Lawn RM, Maniatis T: The organization of repetitive sequences in mammalian globin gene clusters. Cold Spr Harb Symp Quant Biol 45: 761–783,1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Furst A, Brown EN, Braunstein JD, Schildkraut CL: α-Globin sequences are located in a region of early-replicating DNA in murine erythroleukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1023–1027, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gjerset RA, Martin DW: Presence of a DNA demethylating activity in the nucleus of murine erythroleukemic cells. J Biol Chem 257:8581–8583, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg DA, Posakony JW, Maniatis T: Correct developmental expression of a cloned alcohol dehydrogenase gene transduced into the Drosphila germ line. Cell 34:59–73, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gurdon JB: The Control of Gene Expression in Animal Development. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haut WE, Taylor JH, 1967. Studies of bromouracil deoxyriboside substitution in DNA of bean roots (Vicia faba). J Mol Biol 26:389–401, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haynes SR, Toomey TP, Leinwood L, Jelinek WR: The Chinese hamster Alu-equivalent sequence: a conserved, highly repetitious, interspersed DNA sequence in mammals has a structure suggestive of a transposable element, 1981.

  23. Heintz Nicholas H, Hamlin JL: An amplified chromosomal sequence that includes the gene for dihydrofolate reductase initiates replication within specific restriction fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:4083–4087, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hines PJ, Benbow RM: Initiation of replication at specific origins in DNA molecules microinjected into unfertilized eggs of the frog Xenopus laevis. Cell 30:459–468, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hiraga S, Sudo T, Yoshida M, Kubota H, Ueyama H: In vitro replication of recombinant plasmids carrying chromosomal segments of Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:3697–3701, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huberman JA, Riggs AD: On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. J Mol Biol 32:327–341, 1968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Humphries RK, Ley T, Turner P, Moulton AD, Nienhuis AW: Differences in human α-, β- and δ-globin gene expression in monkey kidney cells. Cell 30:173–183, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jahner D, Stuhlmann H, Stewart CL, Harbers K, Lohler J, Simon I, Jaenisch R: Methylation and expression of retroviral genomms during mouse embryogenesis. Nature 298:623–628,1982.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kajiwara K, Mueller GC: Molecular events in the reproduction of animal cells. III. Fractional synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid with 5-bromode oxyuridine and its effects on cloning efficiency. Biochim Biophys Acta 91:486–493, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klevecz RR, Keniston BA, Deaven LL: The temporal structure of S phase. Cell 5:195–203, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lacy E, Roberts S, Evans EP, Burtenshaw MD, Constantini FD: A foreign β-globin gene in transgenic mice: integration at abnormal chromosomal positions and expression in inappropriate tissues. Cell 34:343–358, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laughlin TJ, Taylor JH: Initiation of DNA replication in chromosomes of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Chromosoma 75:19–35,1979.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Loon U: Detection of a 10 kb DNA replication intermediate in human melanoma cells. Chromosoma 84:663–673, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lonn U, Lonn S, 1983. Aphidicolin inhibits the synthesis and joining of short DNA fragments, but not the union of 10 kb DNA replication intermediates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 3996–3999, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lough J, Bischoff R: Differential sensitivity to 5-bromodeoxyuridine during the S phase of synchronized myogenic cells. Devel Biol 50: 457–475, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  36. McKnight SL, Bustin M, Miller OL: Electron microscopic analysis of chromosome metabolism in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Cold Spr Harb Symp Quant Biol 82:741–754, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mohandas T, Sparkes RS, Shapiro LJ: Reactivation of an inactive human X chromosome: evidence for X inactivation by DNA methylation. Science 211:393–396, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ockey CH, Saffhill R: The comparative effects of short term DNA inhibition on replicon synthesis in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 103:361–373, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Patient RK, Banville D, Brewer AC, Elkington JA, Greaves DR, Lloyd MM, Williams JG: The organization of the tadpole and adult globin genes of Xenopus laevis. Nucl Acids Res 10:7935–7945, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rubin GM, Spradling AC: Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218:348–353,1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ryffel GU, Muellener DB, Gerber-Huber S, WylerT, Wahli W: Scattering of repetitive DNA sequences in the albumin and vitellogenin gene of Xenopus laevis. Nucl Acids Res (submitted), 1984.

  42. Scarano E, Tosi L, Granieri A: Enzymatic modifications of DNA: a model for the molecular basis of cell differentiation; In: The Biochemistry of Adenosylmethionine. Columbia Univ Press, New York, 1977, pp. 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schmid CW, Jelinek WR: The Alu family of dispersed repetitive sequences. Science 216:1065–1070, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schmidt M: Two phases of DNA replication in human cells. Chromosoma 76:101–110, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scholnick SB, Morgan BA, Hirsh J: The cloned Dopa decarboxylase gene is developmentally regulated when reintegrated into the Drosophila genome. Cell 34:37–45, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Selzer G, Tomizawa J-I: Specific cleavage of the p15A primer precursor by ribonuclease H at the origin of DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7082–7086, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kohwi-Shigematsu Th, Gelinas R, Weintraub H: Detection of an altered DNA conformation at specific sites in chromatin and supercoiled DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4389–4393,1983.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spradling AC, Rubin GM: The effect of chromosomal position on the expression of the Drosophila xanthine dehydrogenase gene. Cell 34:47–57, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stinchcomb DT, Thomas M, Kelly J, Selker E, Davis RW: Eukaryotic DNA segments capable of autonomous replication in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:4559–4563, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sturm K, Taylor JH: Distribution of 5-methylcytosine in the DNA of somatic and germline cells from bovine tissue. Nucl Acids Res 9:4537–4546, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Suzuki N, Okada S: Localization of Ala 32 gene replication in the cell cycle of cultured mammalian cells. Mutation Res 30:111–116, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor JH: Regulation of DNA replication and variegationtype position effects. In: RJC Harris (ed). Symp Internatl Soc Cell Biol 3. Acad Press, New York and London, 1964, pp 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor JH: Increase in DNA replication sites in cells held at the beginning of S-phase. Chromosoma 62:291–300, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Taylor JH: Control of initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. In: I Molineau and M Kohiyama (eds). DNA Synthesis Present and Future. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1978, pp. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Taylor JH: DNA replication in mammalian cells. In: Y Becker (ed). Molecular Events in the Replication of Viral and Cellular Genomes. M. Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1983, pp 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Taylor JH: DNA methylation and cellular differentiation. Springer-Verlag (in press).

  57. Taylor JH, Hozier JC: Evidence for a four micron replication unit in CHO cells. Chromosoma 57:341–350, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Taylor JH, Miner P: Units of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. Cancer Res 28:1810–1814, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Taylor JH, Watanabe S: Eukaryotic origins: studies of a cloned segment from Xenopus laevis and comparisons with human BLUR clones. ICN-UCLA Symp Mol Cell Biol 22:597–606,1981.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Truett MA, Gall JG: The replication of ribosomal DNA in the macronucleus of Tetrahymena. Chromosoma 64: 295–303,1977.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vogt VM, Braun R: The replication of ribosomal DNA in Physarum polycephalum. Eur J Biochem 80:557–566, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Watanabe S, Taylor JH: Cloning of an origin of DNA replication of Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:5292–5296,1980.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Weisbrod S: Active chromatin. Nature 297:289–295, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Williams JG: Mouse and supermouse. Nature 300:575, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wolf SF, Migeon BR: Studies of X-chromosome DNA methylation in normal human cells. Nature 292:667–671, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yunis JJ, Koo MT, Saunders GF: Localization of sequences specifying messenger RNA to light-staining G-bands of human chromosomes, 1977.

  67. Goldman MA, Holmquist GP, Gray MC, Caston CA, Nag A: Replication timing of mammalian genes and middle repetitive sequences. Science (submitted).

  68. Marchionni MA, Roufa DJ: Replication of viral DNA sequences integrated within the chromatin of SV-40 transformed Chinese hamster lung cells. Cell 26:245–258, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Holmquist G, Gray M, Porter T, Jordan J: Characterization of Giemsa dark- and light-band DNA. Cell 31:121–129, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Harland RM, Laskey RA: Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis. Cell 21:761–771, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, J.H. Origins of replication and gene regulation. Mol Cell Biochem 61, 99–109 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222489

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222489

Keywords

Navigation