Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular phylogeny of the Pooideae (Poaceae) based on nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships of the Poaceae subfamily, Pooideae, were estimated from the sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA. The entire ITS region of 25 species belonging to 19 genera representing seven tribes was directly sequenced from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA fragments. The published sequence of rice, Oryza saliva, was used as the outgroup. Sequences of these taxa were analyzed with maximum parsimony (PAUP) and the neighbor-joining distance method (NJ). Among the tribes, the Stipeae, Meliceae and Brachypodieae, all with small chromosomes and a basic number more than x=7, diverged in succession. The Poeae, Aveneae, Bromeae and Triticeae, with large chromosomes and a basic number of x=7, form a monophyletic clade. The Poeae and Aveneae are the sister group of the Bromeae and Triticeae. On the ITS tree, the Brachypodieae is distantly related to the Triticeae and Bromeae, which differs from the phylogenies based on restriction-site variation of cpDNA and morphological characters. The phylogenetic relationships of the seven pooid tribes inferred from the ITS sequences are highly concordant with the cytogenetic evidence that the reduction in chromosome number and the increase in chromosome size evolved only once in the pooids and pre-dated the divergence of the Poeae, Aveneae, Bromeae and Triticeae.

This paper reports factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avdulov NP (1931) Karyo-systematische Untersuchungen der Familie Gramineen. Bull Appl Bot Genet Plant Breed Suppl 44:1–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG (1992) Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants:an example from the Compositae. Mol Phylog Evol 1:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG (1993) Molecular phylogenetics of Calycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA:chromosomal and morphological evolution reexamined. Am J Bot 80:222–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkworth ME (1982) Embryological characters and the taxonomy of the Stipeae (Gramineae). Taxon 31:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkworth ME, Everett J (1987) Evolution in the Stipeae identification and relationships of its monophyletic taxa. In:Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C., pp 251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum BR (1987) Numerical taxonomic analyses of the Poaceae. In:Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Instituation, Washington, D. C., pp 334–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton WD (1981) Evolution and distribution of grasses. Ann Mis Bot Gard 68:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton WD, Renvoize SA (1986) Genera graminum. Kew Bull Add Ser 13:1–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JI, Soreng RJ (1993) Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Am J Bot 80:1444–1454

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DR (1982) Genomic and phylogenetic relationships among North American perennial Triticeae grasses. In:Estes JR, Tyrl RJ, Brunken JN (eds) Grasses and grasslands systematics and ecology. University of Oklahoma Press, Oklahoma, pp 51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DR (1984) The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. In:Gustafson JP (ed) Gene manipulation in plant inprovement. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, pp 209–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ (1992) The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phytogeny. In:Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York London, pp 340–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Enomoto SI, Ogihara Y, Tsunewaki K (1985) Studies on the origin of crop species by restriction endonuclease analysis of organellar DNA. I. Phylogenetic relationships among ten cereals revealed by the restriction fragment patterns of chloroplast DNA. Jpn J Genet 60:411–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB (1982) Sequence amplification, deletion and rearrangement:major sources of variation during species divergence. In:Dover GA, Flavell RB (eds) Genome evolution. Academic Press Eondon, pp 301–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould FW, Shaw RB (1983) Grass systematics, 2nd edn. Texas A and M University press, College Station, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R (1992) CLUSTAL V:Improved Software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS 8:189–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilu KW, Wright K (1982) Systematics of Gramineae:a cluster analysis study. Taxon 31:9–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C, Chatterton NJ, Asay KH, Jensen KB (1994) Phylogenetic relationships of 10 grass species:an assessment of phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer region in nuclear ribosomal DNA in monocots. Genome 37:112–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C, Chatterton NJ, Asay KH, Jensen KB (1995) Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences. Genome (in press)

  • Kellogg EA (1992) Tools for studying the chloroplast genome in the Triticeae (Gramineae):an EcoRI map, a diagnostic deletion, and support for Bromus as an outgroup. Am J Bot 79:186–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg EA, Campbell CS (1987) Phylogenetic analyses of the Gramineae. In:Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 310–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg EA, Watson L (1993) Phylogenetic studies of a large data set. I. Bambusoideae, Andropogonodae, and Pooideae (Gramineae). Bot Rev 59:273–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihara H (1954) Considerations on the evolution and distribution of Aegilops species based on the analyzer method. Cytologia 19:336–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (1993) MEGA, Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 1.0. Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassner MW, Peterson P, Yoder JI (1989) Simultaneous amplification of multiple DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction in the analysis of transgenic plants and their progeny. Plant Mol Biol Rep 7:116–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane TD (1987) Poaceae subfamily Pooideae. In:Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C., pp 265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane TD, Watson L (1980) The circumscription of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae, with notes on some controversial genera. Taxon 29:645–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane TD, Watson E (1982) The classification of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae. Taxon 31:178–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML (1979) Some considerations on the phylogeny and chromosomal evolution in grasses. Cytologia 44:679–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (1973) The nonstructural carbohydrates. In:Butler GW, Bailey RW (eds) Chemistry and biochemistry of herbage. Academic Press, Eondon New York 1:105–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Soreng RJ, Davis JI, Doyle JJ (1990) A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in Poaceae subfam. Pooideae. Plant Syst Evol 172:83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1956) Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family. Am J Bot 43:890–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1982) Major trends of evolution in the Poaceae and their possible significance. In:Estes JR, Tyrl RJ, Brunken JN (eds) Grasses and grasslands. University of Oklahoma Press, Oklahoma, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1987) Grass systematics and evolution:past, present and future. In:Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D. C., pp 359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GE, Crampton B (1961) A suggested revision of the grass genera of temperate north America. Rec Adv Bot 1:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh Y, Thien EB, Reeve HE, Zimmer EA (1993) Molecular evolution and phylogenetic implications of internal transcribed spacer sequences of ribosomal DNA in Winteraceae. Am J Bot 80:1042–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DE (1993) PAUP, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. for Apple Macintosh. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaiwa F, Oono K, Sugiura M (1985) Nucleotide sequence of the 17s–25s spacer region from rice rDNA. Plant Mol Biol 4:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateoka T (1957) Miscellaneous papers on the phylogeny of Poaceae (10). Proposition of a new phylogenetic system of Poaceae. J Jap Bot 32:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateoka T (1962) Starch grains of endosperm in grass systematics. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 75:377–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzvelev NN (1989) The system of grasses (Poaceae) and their evolution. Bot Rev 55:141–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson L, Knox RB (1976) Pollen wall antigens and allergens:taxonomically-ordered variation among grasses. Ann Bot 40:399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson L, Clifford HT, Dallwitz MJ (1985) The classification of Poaceae:subfamilies and supertribes. Aust J Bot 33:433–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Hanafey MK, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1993) Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods Enzymol 218:704–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski MF, Sanderson MJ, Baldwin BG, Donoghue MJ (1993) Monophyly of aneuploid astragalus (Fabaceae):evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Am J Bot 80:711–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe KH, Li WH, Sharp PM (1987) Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, choloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:9054–9058

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurawski G, Clegg MT (1987) Evolution of higher plant chloroplast DNA-encoded genes implications for structure-function and phylogenetic studies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38:391–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dooner

This paper is a cooperative investigation of USDA-ARS and the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station. Logan, Utah 84322. Journal Paper No. 4581

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsiao, C., Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H. et al. Molecular phylogeny of the Pooideae (Poaceae) based on nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 389–398 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221981

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221981

Key words

Navigation