Skip to main content
Log in

Disagreements when using ordered categories

  • Note
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berk, R.A. (1979). “Generalizability of behavioral observations: a clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability”, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 83: 460–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D.V. (1976). “Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: resolving some basic issues”, British Journal of Psychiatry 129: 452–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P. and Skene, A.M. (1979). “Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the EM algorithm”, Applied Statistics 28: 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, L.H. (1949). “On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures”, Radiology 52: 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koran, L.M. (1975). “The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgements”, New England Journal of Medicine 293: 642–646, 695–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.K. (1979). “Interobserver agreement, reliability and generalizability of data collected in observational studies”, Psychological Bulletin 86: 376–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.W. (1976). “Comparing the joint agreement of several raters with another rater”, Biometrics 32: 619–627.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchinson, T.P. Disagreements when using ordered categories. Qual Quant 15, 593–596 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221558

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221558

Navigation